Originally Posted by bob4432

I am not a developer and can see it just fine...

I'm talking about L1+DCA algorithm, not about Pin mapping. All articles I can view just fine except L1

Originally Posted by Sir Alex

I'm talking about L1+DCA algorithm, not about Pin mapping. All articles I can view just fine except L1

my bad, thought you were talking about pin mapping - didn't read your whole post, sorry

Sorry for the confusion, guys!
It's been decided that the info about the L1+DCA will only be available for developers since it's a very early stage of development and not meant to be part of the beta testing.

Good news is: AQ6 boards are available in the stores for the next round of beta testers!
http://viacopter.eu/index.php?page=s...mart&Itemid=53
http://flyduino.net/Autoquad-6-public-beta-Version_1

When will it be available to be used with normal receiver's as I use the JR8XG radio,many thank's,Marty.

Originally Posted by NEAGRON

When will it be available to be used with normal receiver's as I use the JR8XG radio,many thank's,Marty.

It works with PPM input now, so any Rx can be made to work. Some have PPM output built in now, some can be modified, and for others a PPM converter could be used.

If you mean direct PWM input from each channel of a Rx, the answer is probably "never." Although with 14 input/output ports, it would be possible, if someone wanted to write the code. A 1-wire PPM connection is much simpler though.

-Max

Originally Posted by NEAGRON

When will it be available to be used with normal receiver's as I use the JR8XG radio,many thank's,Marty.

In its current hardware form? Never, why give up 6-8 ports for standard receivers. If you want to use 'normal' receivers you can use a pwm-ppm converter board.

Is it any info how to make Graupner Hott receiver telemetry work with AQ ?

Thanks,

John

This might provide the info you are looking for:

http://autoquad.org/wiki/wiki/development/user-add-ons/mavlink-led-signaling-hott/

Originally Posted by Flyrobot

Is it any info how to make Graupner Hott receiver telemetry work with AQ ?

Thanks,

John

Originally Posted by GoFaster

This might provide the info you are looking for:

http://autoquad.org/wiki/wiki/development/user-add-ons/mavlink-led-signaling-hott/

Hi GoFaster,

Many thanks, this is what im looking for.

John

Originally Posted by kinderkram

Good news is: AQ6 boards are available in the stores for the next round of beta testers!

Bought one yesterday, today received a tracking number. Cool

Originally Posted by maximal

If you mean direct PWM input from each channel of a Rx, the answer is probably "never." Although with 14 input/output ports, it would be possible, if someone wanted to write the code. A 1-wire PPM connection is much simpler though.

Btw, are there any S-Bus Futaba cheap clones, tested with AQ?

Something like this https://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s...ompatible.html or https://www.hobbyking.com/hobbyking/s..._Receiver.html

Originally Posted by DVE

Btw, are there any S-Bus Futaba cheap clones, tested with AQ?

We've only heard from one user so far who tried to use a FrSky FAAST/SBus Rx and it didn't go very well.

http://forum.autoquad.org/viewtopic....start=30#p5746

So far it seems like only genuine Futaba receivers work with SBus. It is not clear why, since the SBus protocol is pretty straight-forward (although Futaba has never published any specs that I know of, and all the current 3rd party implementations seem to be based on one person's analysis of the protocol). More testing is needed.

-Max

fatuba has a sbus addapter
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...3&d=1345133817

Originally Posted by Andre6553

fatuba has a sbus addapter
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...3&d=1345133817

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...&postcount=638

Originally Posted by Andre6553

fatuba has a sbus addapter
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...3&d=1345133817

This is exactly the one causing troubles since it has its own failsafe function which can't be disabled!
So we can't recommend this atm.

Well that's not really the problem (although it is an additional issue with that converter), but it's definitely causing trouble.