New Products Flash Sale
Thread Tools
Old Jan 29, 2009, 08:51 PM
sneasle is offline
Find More Posts by sneasle
War Eagle!
sneasle's Avatar
do it.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:03 PM
Carl Petersen is offline
Find More Posts by Carl Petersen
Registered User
Carl Petersen's Avatar
LOL. this just gets better. An actual aluminum skin. Get your polishing rags out
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:38 PM
jfetter is online now
Find More Posts by jfetter
HAL... Open the damn doors!
jfetter's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dag214
Hey all,
Anybody ever hear that you can only run 2 ESC of a single RX???? In the end not a show stopper if true as I have 3RX that I could bind to the main TX.

Thanks, DAG
I've never heard that before, what is the source?

Jack
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:40 PM
jfetter is online now
Find More Posts by jfetter
HAL... Open the damn doors!
jfetter's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dag214
Thanks everyone for your input. What was told to me is that someone from another ESC manufacturer said that things might get weird when running more that 2 ESC of a single RX, this make zero since to me as it is all digital. Just wanted to know if anyone had heard of any problems. I know over in the UK there is many 4 motors planes running with 4 ESC of a single RX.

Thanks all,

DAG
Not only is it digital but it's optically isolated from the power side, I don't see how a modern ESC is any different to the RX than a servo...

Jack
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:40 PM
dag214 is offline
Find More Posts by dag214
Rock On- Damon Atwood
dag214's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfetter
I've never heard that before, what is the source?

Jack
Just another great flier that heard it from another source.

DAG
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:41 PM
dag214 is offline
Find More Posts by dag214
Rock On- Damon Atwood
dag214's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfetter
Not only is it digital but it's optically isolated from the power side, I don't see how a modern ESC is any different to the RX than a servo...

Jack
Agreed, but I will find out soon .
DAG
Old Jan 29, 2009, 09:43 PM
jfetter is online now
Find More Posts by jfetter
HAL... Open the damn doors!
jfetter's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dag214
Agreed, but I will find out soon .
DAG
Well, you're going to have 3 on L RX and 3 on R RX anyway, so if the guy using 4 via y-cables regularly is correct, should be a non-event...

Jack
Old Jan 29, 2009, 10:35 PM
ska2000 is offline
Find More Posts by ska2000
Registered User
oh no! You can't share your source for the aluminum skin? Does it already have adhesive backing? If not, how are you laying it down? I've read a lot about applying flite metal as that's what I want to use on my next project. Most still glass beneath the aluminum since the glass allows you to burnish the aluminum down without damaging the wood underneath. The Al is mostly burnished with your finger, but complex curves often require using tools. You can actually stretch the material quite a bit through burnishing; and even small wrinkles and other imperfections can be burnished until completely smooooth. There are other techniques to get the but joints perfect as well. If wanted, you can burnish a joint until it's invisible. At .004, it's really not heavier than heat shrink coating is it? Further, many many planes have Al coating and it doesn't seem to interfere with radio reception.

Oh! And have you heard of the guy electroplating models? It's not cheap, but man is the end result sweet! I would like to have that done to the Ziroli D-18 I'm building next!

Tom
Old Jan 29, 2009, 10:52 PM
feathermerchant is online now
Find More Posts by feathermerchant
Use the 4S Luke
feathermerchant's Avatar
Al skin - Some high perf free flights use it for strength bonded to balsa sheet. You could bond first then sheet as one. My dad built an AL skinned FF and the wings were both incredibly thin and stiff. BUTwhat about necessary RF getting thru to receivers. It would be a shae if you could not pass a range check. This could be a bad idea. 2.4GHz iz more senstitve tometallic objects due to shorter wavelength. Build a box and reange check it.

I have run 2 esc with BEC off one Rx. Three sould be no prob. You probably won't have BEC's anyway. It would be really easy to test later.
Old Jan 29, 2009, 10:54 PM
Wade Joos is offline
Find More Posts by Wade Joos
EB-66C Team Member
Wade Joos's Avatar
In answer to your question to more than one esc on a single radio channel --- These are all just "Y'd" together. No problem
The receiver is a JR 2.4

What I might suggest though is that you find one of those "Amplified" "Y" connectors and then run one output to the left wing and the other output to the right wing.
RCG Plus Member
Old Jan 29, 2009, 10:59 PM
feathermerchant is online now
Find More Posts by feathermerchant
Use the 4S Luke
feathermerchant's Avatar
Beautiful plane.
I think he will have separate receivers in the wings. No need to interconnect anything. Spektrum recommends against any amplified extensions in their instructions.
Old Jan 29, 2009, 11:12 PM
SteveT. is online now
Find More Posts by SteveT.
I fly, therefore, I crash!!!
SteveT.'s Avatar
Hi Guys...

In answer to The question of where did the info on not running too many ESCs off of one RX come from, that came from me. I asked the Dag the question, because I was told not to do it by one of the folks at Castle Creations, in response to a question about it that I asked while researching the possible build of a large EDF B-52. I was told that the RX must see a certain load, and that too many ESCs on one RX would cause a problem.

SteveT
RCG Plus Member
Last edited by SteveT.; Jan 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM.
Old Jan 29, 2009, 11:53 PM
FL62 is offline
Find More Posts by FL62
Average Joe 2 Semi-Pro n Back!
FL62's Avatar
Well, it won't be an issue with our ESC's for sure! Our C50 Quad system uses four individual C50 Competition Motors each with their own ESC - and we've not had any issues with these at all! A variety of different radio brands and models have been used.


Mike
PS - Damon - your remaining ESC's went out today via UPS 2nd day air
Old Jan 30, 2009, 12:09 AM
SteveT. is online now
Find More Posts by SteveT.
I fly, therefore, I crash!!!
SteveT.'s Avatar
Quote:
Well, it won't be an issue with our ESC's for sure! Our C50 Quad system uses four individual C50 Competition Motors each with their own ESC - and we've not had any issues with these at all! A variety of different radio brands and models have been used.
Hi Mike...

That is good to hear... I guess I talked to the wrong company when I asked that question....

And....what the heck are you powering with that Quad 50 setup? A fullsize plane????

SteveT
RCG Plus Member
Latest blog entry: My hangar...
Old Jan 30, 2009, 12:59 AM
Tim Farrar is offline
Find More Posts by Tim Farrar
Bi-Planes
Tim Farrar's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dag214
This is really cool.
This is off a 3"X60 yards roll of real aluminum. It comes with red writing on it, but comes of with one pass of finger nail polish remover.

It is is .004" thick, what do you think of this????

DAG
I think it looks great Dag !!

But you are poking the holes right ?
When you go to do that it might be great to use one of those Monokote Woodpeckers.
Maybe you could take it apart and only use one wheel.

Are you sure it is only 3" wide ?
It sure looks wider !!


Seeya, Tim


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good B-36 site (drawing with cross sections, too!) Thomas B Scale Kit/Scratch Built 26 Oct 11, 2011 10:14 PM
Discussion B-36 B-52 kgmorris Scale Kit/Scratch Built 20 Jan 02, 2009 07:27 AM
b-36 dorysch1 Scale Kit/Scratch Built 32 Feb 01, 2004 09:33 PM
Questions about my wally B-36...I'm new to foam. Boba_Fett Foamies (Kits) 8 Jun 11, 2002 04:36 PM
B 36 Trobber Parkflyers 3 Dec 30, 2001 01:33 PM