Thread Tools
Jan 19, 2008, 01:41 AM
Registered User
I think Julez' question was rhetorical.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jan 19, 2008, 01:44 AM
Registered User
I agree I wasn't talking to him.
Jan 19, 2008, 05:26 AM
I don't want to "Switch Now"
pmackenzie's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by gotak
We should be bidding, as RC flyers, for some of that UHF bandwidth being freed up with digital TV.
I think you mean begging.

Pat MacKenzie
Jan 19, 2008, 06:00 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by skubacb
HarrisM, I understand it and quoted it.
I see your posting has been edited. My apologies for the sarcasm!
Jan 19, 2008, 10:40 AM
Registered User
skubacb's Avatar
My apologies for missing the first quote. I also edited about the resonant freq. I was wrong. Think I it must have been after my bed time.

I thought we were missing the point about what some people had seen with the 900mhz system in testing. Nothing wrong with theory.
Nov 17, 2017, 11:15 AM
Thermals, Tom
RyanNX211's Avatar
FrSky offers a 900mhz module and now Jeti has systems that transmit on 2.4 and 900 simultaneously. I think if XPS could offer modules capable of the same, they'd be in a very good position
Latest blog entry: Steak and Old Timers
Nov 18, 2017, 01:39 AM
I moved away from 900MHz to 433MHz. The range is over 400 miles at a low baud rate, 110 miles at the same baud rate we are using now for 2.4GHz. Postage stamp size transmitter module and receiver. Technology just keeps getting better.
Nov 18, 2017, 07:50 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimDrew
I moved away from 900MHz to 433MHz. The range is over 400 miles at a low baud rate, 110 miles at the same baud rate we are using now for 2.4GHz. Postage stamp size transmitter module and receiver. Technology just keeps getting better.
I donít see that listed on your website, Jim ...... where is it ??
Nov 18, 2017, 08:50 AM
Thermals, Tom
RyanNX211's Avatar
I want to try 433mhz!
Latest blog entry: Steak and Old Timers
Nov 18, 2017, 04:40 PM
This is not available to the public.
Nov 18, 2017, 07:00 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimDrew
This is not available to the public.
I guess it’s back to FrSky and Jeti as a viable choice ..... for the $$ and product development that’s available to the public , you sure can’t beat FrSky !!!
Nov 18, 2017, 09:10 PM
Thermals, Tom
RyanNX211's Avatar
I'd rather have something Arizona made.
Latest blog entry: Steak and Old Timers
Nov 19, 2017, 07:14 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanNX211
I'd rather have something Arizona made.
As would I . But sadly, it ainít gonna happen ..... thatís why I have a Taranis and JR with XPS module/rxís........

In all honesty, the FrSky link is just as solid !!
Nov 19, 2017, 08:25 AM
Thermals, Tom
RyanNX211's Avatar
Any idea why Wrektum's link is so poor?
Latest blog entry: Steak and Old Timers
Nov 19, 2017, 10:38 AM
From an over-air signal standpoint Spektrum is better than Futaba/FrKksy/Hitec (which are all the same and the easiest to interfere with). XPS/JETI/JR DMSS are the best (and the same except XPS also has ACKs).


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion 900 MHz vs 2.4 GHz ISM bands INewton DIY Electronics 5 Jul 13, 2018 01:01 AM
Question FM or 2.4 GHz jazi Radios 5 Oct 23, 2007 10:02 AM
Discussion 50 MHZ or 2.4..... GhostRider32 Radios 8 Dec 28, 2006 09:01 AM
Video downlinks: 2.4 GHz or 900 MHz aragon Aerial Photography 4 Apr 22, 2005 04:26 AM