



Here on this forum the Good Dr. Kiwi has tested some of the new GWS HD threebladers. All the info you would ever need is most likely there. or here...
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=781035 

Last edited by 56S; Dec 09, 2007 at 12:28 PM.
Reason: can't spell!




aireze,
There is a very complicated formula for determining the load factor of a propeller, but in it's most simplistic form, for a 2bladed prop, the load that a prop places on a motor is equal to the diameter cubed times the pitch or D x D x D x P. For a 2 bladed 10x6 prop, the load factor would be 10 x 10 x 10 x 6 or 6,000. For a 12x8 prop it would be 12 x 12 x 12 x 8 or 13,824. The more complete formula, which takes the number of prop blades into account is D x D x D x P x Square root (N1), where N = the number of prop blades. For a 2 bladed prop, the square root of (21) is the square root of 1 which is 1, so the term just drops out of the equation. For a 3bladed prop, the correction factor is the square root of (31) or the square root of 2, which is 1.414. For a 4 bladed prop, the correction factor is the square root of 3, which is equal to 1.732 So if you have a 3bladed 9x7 prop, then the load factor is 9 x 9 x 9 x 7 x 1.414, which is 7,216, and this would be roughly wquivilent to a 2bladed 10x7 prop, which has a load factor of 7,000. If you had a 4bladed 12x7 prop, then the load factor would be 12 x 12 x 12 x 7 x 1.732 or 20,950 This would be roughly equivelent to a 2bladed 14x8 prop, which has a load factor of 21,952. In the end, if the load factor of 2 props is the same, you will get similar RPMs from the two props, and similar performance. So there you go, hope that helps! Lucien 



Go down 1 in. diameter with the same pitch will put you in the ball park.
Gord. 





I've always used this formula: 2/x to the .25 power. 2 = number of blades of two bladed prop. This is a constant. X = number of blades you want (usually 3 or 4) The answer you get is a decimal. Multiply it by the diameter of the two bladed prop and your answer is the new prop. Use the same pitch.
To simplify; for a three blade, 2/3 raised to the .25 power = .903602 This is the two to three blade factor. To go from a two to four blade, 2/4 raised to the .25 power = .8408964 This is the four blade factor. 2/5 to the .25 power = .7952707 5 blade 2/6 to the .25 power = .7598357 6 blade So, if you have a 107 two blade and want a three blade: 10 x .903602 = 9.036 diameter. Round it off to 9, use same pitch, 97 three blade. If you start with three blades and want to go to two, divide the three blade diameter by the same .903 factor to get the two blade diameter. These factors are virtually identical to what Slipstick said. 





There cheap enough at www.gwsprops.com to try them out in all the sizes.
The Direct drive GWS shaped 3 blades are quite a bit differant in comparison amp draws than the SLO fly series 3 blades. Something you must consider. I generally just drop down by 1" in the dia of the 2 blade as a starting point. I am running more 3 blades than 2 now days as the torq effects for same thrust ratings are reduced. I preffer only the Direct drive profile however. 





Really appreciate the posts here guys learned alot!






Quote:







sorry wrong thread






About the 2 prop thing.Quote:







I hate to say it but once you have it narrowed down that close it's time to buy some props and test them. Luckily at that size $20 should buy you about six props to test.
I suggest APC props and Xoar PJN props http://www.xoarintl.com/rcpropeller...Propeller/#des https://www.apcprop.com/category_s/2...how=100&page=1 





And if you look at the performance data files on the APC prop pages you can study the thrust and input power figures there for two blade and multiblade props of various sizes and get some info on the differences. It is admittedly theoretical data but I always feel that having that is better than not having any data at all.
https://www.apcprop.com/v/PERFILES_W...tDatafiles.asp One factor that has not been mentioned is that the more blades you have the less likely it is that the performance from each blade will cumulative as blades are added. The additional blades will be running in air that may be a little disturbed by the action of the previous blade or blades and that will also vary with the aircrafts advance rate and get worse as the RPM gets higher. I would suspect that when we do static testing the lack of advance as the prop runs and thrust is measured is one of the things that makes our data differ from the almost impossible to measure results we get in flight. Jack 


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Category  Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help!  Prop conversion 2 to 3 blade??  JRAllen  Electric Plane Talk  4  Oct 22, 2006 08:32 AM 
Conversion from 2blade to 3blade prop  tumbleweed  Power Systems  4  Apr 10, 2003 08:55 AM  
Beaver on 8 720 Nimh & 3 blade prop  GoodTill  Parkflyers  0  Jul 06, 2002 11:29 AM  
gws 3 BLADE Prop now available at.....  Bleriot  Parkflyers  5  Feb 16, 2002 04:10 PM  
2 blade v. 3 blade prop  planeluv  Scale Kit/Scratch Built  1  Dec 12, 2001 11:15 AM 