Thread Tools
This thread is privately moderated by Jack Crossfire, who may elect to delete unwanted replies.
May 21, 2007, 02:26 AM
Registered User
Jack Crossfire's Avatar
Thread OP
Discussion

Imu 2.0


So with the IMU now bolted to the fuselage, vibration is definitely worse than the skid mounted IMU but miraculously the Kalman seems more stable and more accurate with it.

The common technique in testing attitude hold is to fix the heading to 0 so you don't have to worry about body frame conversions. What always happens with that is a pitch up, gimbal lock, and autopilot terrorism.

With the strap-on IMU, we had record attitude + altitude + velocity holds up to 88 seconds. Yet another incremental improvement but still showing unstable tilt oscillation and high velocities. The flight data shows the strap-on IMU with high sample rates to be just as slow at producing equivalent accuracy as the skid mounted IMU with low sample rates.

Instead of averaging more samples on the PIC, we're using a smaller DT/integration step in the Kalman filter with the higher sample rate. That and the fuselage mounting seems to be the magic touch.

So with the weather and the lack of open space, 1 test flight per day is the most that we can pull off even without a day job. With the amount of data generated by these flights and the preparation for each flight, 1 flight per day is probably the best in any circumstance.
Last edited by Jack Crossfire; May 21, 2007 at 02:38 AM.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts


Quick Reply
Message:
Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB/WTT 2.0 meg digital camera tripster Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 0 Feb 04, 2003 09:44 PM
2.0 MP camera? kepople Aerial Photography 17 Oct 28, 2002 11:49 AM
Profili 2.0 is available! slopeiron Slope Soaring 2 Oct 13, 2002 08:17 AM
Profili & TurboCad 2.0 martin johnson Electric Plane Talk 3 Feb 14, 2002 12:00 PM
FMS 2.0 Beta Mark Fitz Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 13 Jun 07, 2001 08:57 AM