Thread Tools
Jul 20, 2005, 02:29 PM
No drugs to fly high
oracle_9's Avatar
Thread OP

general radio frequecy question (non-r/c)?


Hello,

I was looking through the net at amateur radio, especially at the "foxhunt" radio hobby ...its a hobby where a bunch of guys with receivers try to find a hidden transmitter in the forest for example. Anyway, from what I gathered, there are two frequencies used mostly, or shall I say more popular in North America. These are 2 meter and 80 meter.

2 meter is 145 Mhz, and the 80 meter is 3.5 Ghz.

Can you see the problem at these numbers?
----------------------
If not, then here it is.

2 meter = 145 Mhz (correct)
80 meter = 3.5 Ghz (false)

3.5 Ghz is suppose to be 0.09 meter (9cm).
-----------------------

I am not a radio amateur so I may be interpreting this wrong since a lot of radio websites show these numbers for 80m. I will now appalogise in advance, if I am wrong, but would someone please clarify this for me?

Why the 3.5 Ghz is implied for 80 meters???

Sidenote, 80 meter is 3.5 "M"hz but that seems too low concerning technical stuff desicrbed in the receivers and special antennas used.

I am confused

PS: a came to this confusing when I wanted to look for a foxhunt tx/rx to instead in my R/C plane as a RF beacon locator.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jul 20, 2005, 03:15 PM
eflyguy
Andy W's Avatar
λ = c / f = c × T f = c / λ
(for RF, c = 299792458 m/s)
..a
Jul 20, 2005, 03:18 PM
eflyguy
Andy W's Avatar
so for 145MHZ,
λ = c / f
= 299792458 / 145000000
= 2.068 m

and for 3.5GHz
λ = c / f
= 299792458 / 3500000000
= 0.085654988 m
Jul 20, 2005, 03:20 PM
eflyguy
Andy W's Avatar
.. and 80m would be
f = c / λ
= 299792458 / 80
= 3747405.725 Hz or 3.747405725 MHz
Jul 20, 2005, 03:20 PM
eflyguy
Andy W's Avatar
.. so they meant 3.5MHz , not GHz..
Jul 20, 2005, 03:20 PM
Registered User
Mr.RC-CAM's Avatar
The 80 meter ham band is roughly 3.5Mhz to 4.0Mhz, not GHZ.

3.500-3.750 MHz: CW, RTTY/Data
3.750-4.000 MHz: CW, Phone, Image

Quote:
PS: a came to this confusing when I wanted to look for a foxhunt tx/rx to instead in my R/C plane as a RF beacon locator.
For a convenient R/C beacon, look at using the UHF band area. The antennas are smaller and more directional, two things you will appreciate in fox hunting a lost model.

RC-CAM
Jul 20, 2005, 03:22 PM
eflyguy
Andy W's Avatar
.. ah, but this sounds like it's not meant to be easy!
Jul 20, 2005, 04:18 PM
No drugs to fly high
oracle_9's Avatar
Thread OP
I agree, mostly likely some of those sites had typo's.

Yea, I was planning to use 2 meter band for this foxhunt setup for my plane. Though I have read somewhere that some people are getting into the 10 "G"hz range, ya...like radar quality. That would be neat.
Jul 20, 2005, 04:26 PM
Registered User
Mr.RC-CAM's Avatar
Microwave based lost model "fox hunting" would not be ideal. The RF in that region attenuates too easily in vegetation and watt for watt, is lower efficiency when it comes to practical range. I recommend the 70cm UHF band.

RC-CAM


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question for pilots (full scale non R/C) Curtis Shinmori Electric Plane Talk 44 Dec 29, 2004 11:59 AM
Radio for one handed r/c pilots? erashby Radios 3 Dec 25, 2002 10:56 PM