Why is the Easy Star so highly regarded for Newbies? - RC Groups
Thread Tools
Jul 17, 2005, 09:33 PM
Registered User

Why is the Easy Star so highly regarded for Newbies?

What about this plane makes it so easy for newbies? I'm considering getting it.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jul 17, 2005, 09:57 PM
6 planes 2 jets 2 helis
Pacoson71's Avatar
It is a good stable plane to teach yourself how to fly.

It also comes with TONS of debate of other trainer planes ie... GWS Slow Stick. (this is a 3ch plane).

You picked a good starting plane, with about 12 days of INCREDIBLE reading if you do a search on Easy Star on these forums.
Jul 17, 2005, 10:56 PM
Registered User
crashingagain's Avatar
It's not as easy as it is durable. Don't get me wrong, it is easy to fly but planes like the slowstick are easier. The easystar shines for it's durability when it comes to newbs, I bet your prop will last longer than your motor since it's a pusher, and since it's a belly slider landing is a no brainer. The foam it's made from bounces if you dork it on all but the most serious crashes. One thing thats tough for some newbs with the easystar is the takeoff since it is hand lauched but one could easily make a takeoff cart for it if you're flying off pavement, I've done this and it works well.

By the way the easystar is not just for newbs, I have one in my fleet, it can be just as fun as my bipes, paterns, and warbirds,...and it's alot easier to fly than my helis.
Jul 18, 2005, 01:47 AM
Registered User
Patrick Plawner's Avatar
If you want to better understand, you can read this:

and this
Jul 18, 2005, 03:02 AM
Registered User
crashingagain has summed things up pretty well but the Easy Star is also considerably better aerodynamically than some other aircraft out there. This is not saying anything against a GWS Beaver for example as I've had one and got more than my money's worth out of it as a bundle of fun but the ES is better. It handles a breeze better, it can thermal given the right day, it won't trip over every time you land (on grass) and so on. Try one and you'll be hooked.
Jul 18, 2005, 09:47 AM
Registered User
http://www.redrockethobbies.com/product_p/mpu13203.htm I found this supposed RTF kit. Why is this so much cheaper then everywhere else? I mailed the company and asked them for a bit more specifics.
Jul 18, 2005, 10:15 AM
Registered User
Patrick Plawner's Avatar
Is this the price with the radio, speed Controlers, servo installed and plane ??
This is soooo cheap and so nice if everything is installed...

Sounds great to me.
Jul 18, 2005, 10:37 AM
Registered User
That looks like the normal price for the RTF version of the Easy Star. Same price here: http://www2.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...&I=LXFXV0&P=ML . It is a good deal.
Jul 18, 2005, 10:40 AM
Registered User
Patrick Plawner's Avatar
Amazing how these companies can get such deals...

I started, few years ago, with a Wingo... What a gap with the possibilities of today. This is really nice !
Jul 18, 2005, 11:24 AM
Registered User
Will it really matter what version I get? The ARF or the RTF?
Jul 18, 2005, 11:28 AM
Registered User
Either one will fly about the same. Putting the ARF together is a bit more work, but not difficult, and you will have to make more decisions while shopping. For the ARF you'll need to choose a transmitter, receiver, servos, and ESC. With either the ARF or RTF, you'll want to purchase a good battery charger and at least two battery packs, though three is better if you want to be able to fly all day (one charging, one cooling off, one in the plane).
Jul 18, 2005, 11:29 AM
A Clinger
rclark's Avatar
I have one that I've trained my youngest on and helped another person on. Anyway the Easy Star brings to the table these items that I feel make a good trainer :

1) Hard to over control due to it's small rudder and is a stable platform.

2) Motor is up out of the way, so breaking a prop isn't a problem with the plane.

3) Easy to construct. Low part count. Couple hours and your ready to fly.

4) Durable. Haven't crashed it yet so haven't tested, but seems like it should take a beating for those who crash. Looks easy to fix.

5) Handles quite a bit of wind (with experience ... recommend to fly without wind when starting) . Aerodynamic.

6) Almost lands itself. It has a long glide path so easy to make 'adjustments' when on final .

7) No landing gear to get caught in grass or be pulled off. Just a simple belly lander.

8) Easy to store and transport. Three Pieces. Wings just pull apart .

9) Motor is Direct Drive, so no gearbox to fiddle with.

10) All electronics are 'standard' and can be moved to another plane when training is complete.

Lastly, it beats the looks of a Slow Stick by a mile (or two) .

Only downer is when it comes time to replace the motor. Not a 'quick' replacement procedure it 'looks' like as I haven't had to do that either .
Jul 18, 2005, 11:50 AM
Registered User
Looks like this kit comes with a better battery and charger. Will that battery make a difference? Could I just put one of those in it?

Jul 18, 2005, 12:06 PM
Registered User
Does anyone know if the Easystar will float?

I am wondering what would happen if I landed it on the lake.....if it floated for a few minutes I would be able to recover it from my boat.

Is this a ridiculous idea?

Jul 18, 2005, 12:08 PM
Registered User
That is a better battery and charger, and yes, you could use that battery with the RTF version of the plane.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Easy Star vs. Slow Stick for AP IamLegend Aerial Photography 28 Jan 21, 2010 02:54 AM
Discussion Easy Star and/or Wing Dragon for Real Flight G3 ??? High Flyin' Simulators 1 Feb 20, 2007 10:11 PM
Question Why are there so many names for the zoom/zap/shogun?! Silverstreak328 Mini Helis 9 Aug 07, 2004 12:28 PM
Landing gear for Easy Star? Dave Roberts Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 6 Jun 22, 2004 09:29 PM
Easy Star's For Sale Mark Miller Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 0 Apr 12, 2004 03:40 PM