TREX XL CCPM vs Mechanical mixing? - RC Groups
Thread Tools
Jun 10, 2005, 02:04 PM
Registered User

TREX XL CCPM vs Mechanical mixing?

Hi All,

I am going to be getting a T-rex XL here within a few months.

Everyone seems very excited about the CCPM version, is that because it is definetely superior to the mechanical mixing version, or do both versions have advantages and disadvantages?

If the CCPM version is definetely superior, why did Align bother releasing two versions? why would anyone continue to buy the non-ccpm version with a measly $10-20 price difference?

Apologies if I am being dumb, am I the only one wondering this?
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jun 10, 2005, 03:49 PM
1.21 Gigawatts!
Steph280's Avatar
The reason for going eCCPM was less linkages and ligher weight, which are both defeated with Align's design. So to tell you the truth, I don't really forsee any benefit of the eCCPM version. If you haven't setup eCCPM on radios before, the only thing it'll bring you is headaches.

Some will argue eCCPM brings better control precision. But we're talking about a plastic micro heli here, not an all metal F3C ship. I seriously doubt even Mr eCCPM Youngblood himself will notice the difference in this case. I challenge anyone to a blind test, flying a mCCPM and eCCPM 450XL side by side without knowing which is which, to tell the difference in flight characteristics.
Jun 10, 2005, 04:33 PM
Registered User
Thanks Steph,

I did wonder about the difficulty in setting up eccpm, as I havent done it before.

Seems to me no two servos are ever going to be entirely identical, so it could be fiddly from the get go if one moves faster or slower than the others.

If like you say the non-ccpm version will be alot easier to set up I think that is the one I will get.

Unless anyone else can shed any further light on the subject.......
Jun 10, 2005, 04:38 PM
1.21 Gigawatts!
Steph280's Avatar
mechanical (mCCPM) version is definitely easier to setup since you have a servo dedicated to each of the function (ail/elev/pitch), where as in eCCPM the 3 servos have to work together. The good part about that is the load is shared among the 3 servos, bad is the interactions that it can cause like you described.

T-Rex's mechanical setup was copied from Raptor which was copied from Bergen Intrepid. It is considered one of the best mechanical setup.
Jun 10, 2005, 04:55 PM
Registered User
Bubblehead's Avatar
One reason to have both eCCPM and mCCPM available is not everyone's radios can be programmed for eCCPM while any heli radio with enough channels can handle mCCPM..
Jun 10, 2005, 06:53 PM
Oz Micro Antenna Maker
I suggest that you get the 450XL (HDE) then upgrade to the Align carbon frame with proper eCCPM when it becomes available.
Jun 10, 2005, 07:44 PM
Registered User
Thanks all, thats what I plan on doing,

I want to get it with the align brushless controller with Governor mode, and the align 3600 kv brushless motor, anyone know of anywhere I can get all three, possibly as a combo package which means a bit of a discount?
Jun 10, 2005, 08:09 PM
Registered User
tried or ? i think they have everything you're after.
Jun 10, 2005, 08:23 PM
Registered User
One of the primary reasons for eCCPM is to take advantage of the combined torque thus increased control provided by the 3 or 4 servos working in unison towards the swashplate.

If you look at other larger and well known precision oriented eCCPM designs, you will rarely find direct servo linkages up to the swashplate. For those with direct linkages, unless the designers took extra care to ensure symmetrical arc travel for aileron and elevator movements around the swashplate, then all of them will suffer from the dreaded interactions problems commonly found in ill conceived eCCPM systems!

Surprisingly though, the Align eCCPM kit with T-cranks, etc... up to the swashplate may actually have less interaction problem than those direct servo linkaged eCCPM kits already on the market.

Without correctly addressing the intricacies of the geometry involved in eCCPM, being lighter is somewhat useless, becasue your interaction problems will only be exascerbated by the additional torque and increased control provided through the combined forces of the servos!

Last edited by mystarzk; Jun 10, 2005 at 08:46 PM.

Quick Reply

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold F/S Brand New Trex XL CCPM /Astro 803T/CC35/ SAB 320/HS-56. epc2 Aircraft - Electric - Helis (FS/W) 3 Sep 29, 2005 08:32 AM
Trex XL CDE vs HDE S2S Mini Helis 2 Sep 04, 2005 12:38 AM
E-Pro 2200mah 11.1v lipo in Trex XL ccpm stickyfingers Mini Helis 1 Jul 20, 2005 09:14 PM
Trex Xl CCPM Motor rich5983 Mini Helis 9 Jun 23, 2005 02:22 AM
Eco 8 CCPM vs Mech mixing albyhouse Electric Heli Talk 0 May 31, 2004 08:34 PM