


MiniHowTo
Climate change  two simple steps
Source: https://archive.epa.gov/climatechang...sics/past.html
Step 1: Eyeballing (or use ruler) temperature change with respect to CO2 on the left two graphs (upper is CO2, lower is temperature). Total temp change (F) divided by Total CO2 change (ppm) = Rate of change of temp w.r.t. CO2. Calculate the rate for the two left graphs (before industrialization) and the two right graphs (after industrialization). Step 2: Compare the rates. For the left graphs (before industrialization), I got rate of change = (15 F to 5F) / (175ppm to 300ppm) = 20 F / 125 ppm = 0.16 F/ppm. For the right graphs (after industrialization), I got rate of change = (1 F to 1.5F) / (300ppm to 400ppm) = 2.5 F / 100 ppm = 0.025 F/ppm. The rate of change of temperature w.r.t CO2 before industrialization is 0.16/0.025 = 6.4 times greater than after industrialization. 






This is a problem related to climate sensitivity, and not simple rates of change.
CO2 is a climate forcing; the relationship between CO2 and radiative forcing is logarithmic. There is much debate about the exact value of sensitivity, but even the skeptics would disagree with your analysis. When we talk about direct temperature changes in the climate, we use (degrees C) / (flux), where the units are C and W/m^2. CO2 levels will make the flux vary, both coming into the atmosphere, and what is being absorbed after emission off the Earth's surface. This will then effect the temperature of the troposphere. There is a "middleman" between CO2 and temperature (radiative forcing). The CO2 levels themselves will alter the rate of change of temperature w.r.t. them. https://scied.ucar.edu/climatesensitivitycalculator 

Last edited by DJO; Dec 21, 2019 at 07:59 PM.
Reason: clarity




The exact logarithmic formula is R = 5.35 * ln(C / C_0)
R = radiative forcing (flux) in W/m^2 C = CO2 concentration in ppm C_0 = reference concetration, normally 280ppm (for before the industrial age). With C = 380 ppm and C_0 = 280 ppm, R = 1.633 With C = 410 ppm and C_0 = 280 ppm, R = 2.040 With C = 600 ppm and C_0 = 280 ppm, R = 4.077 





More info if you are interested:
https://skepticalscience.com/C02emi...regrowth.html 


Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Category  Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help!  One step forward two steps back  Papasmurfy  Beginner Multirotor Drones  6  Nov 19, 2017 08:43 PM 
Discussion  Trump softens stance on Paris climate pact..... and man induced climate change  Sonny McGhee  Life, The Universe, and Politics  111  Nov 24, 2016 04:54 PM 
Discussion  Next simple step up from kk2 board  phil419mike  Multirotor Drone Electronics  0  Nov 16, 2015 08:05 PM 
Yippee!  Is Climate Change Causing Climate Models to Fail?  UlteriorModem  Life, The Universe, and Politics  8  May 08, 2015 08:04 PM 
Discussion  Barbara Boxer: Climate change "leading cause of conflict" over the next two decades.  craab  Life, The Universe, and Politics  24  Jun 17, 2010 01:14 PM 