|
|
|
Greg is doing the right idea because with a separate GS, the range is further for us non-mini-quad FPV'ers....
All the other HD GS box won't allow you to attach your own Goggles to it, until now ![]() I thought Greg was lazy and all he did was collect our money....i was full blown wrong as I sampled/wronged out that new SCOUT goggle. It will replace my all time fav HEADPLAY SE. |
Latest blog entry: My FAVORITE FPV CockPits'!!!!
|
|
|
|
||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
1) Fly with a wider angle lens so that the "cropped" 4:3 portion of the display is still what you normally fly with. You still fly with HD quality while recording cinematic 16:9. 2) Use 16:9 goggles (like DominatorV3, BaseD, Glyph, etc). 3) Fly in 16:9 mode with 4:3 goggles (compressed screen). Fat Shark |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
The system does gracefully degrade at a rate similar to analog but it does drop off completely when exceptionally low signal. So there is an adjustment to how you would fly compared to analog (be ready to punch up as the system has immediate signal recovery). Fat Shark |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
Fat Shark |
|
|
||
|
|
|
for me hd system need to be affordable if we want to see more about them on the field
for the moment it s overpriced for most of us. now i prefer this system over dji for many reasons...in two years dji will have a new system and will push you to buy the new model.. compatibility between generation is very important because the price of this system are not cheap |
|
|
|
||
|
Quote:
Glad you are enjoying the Scout. I literally built them with you in mind. Fat Shark |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
Fat Shark |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
Put out an hdmi model and one without to let customer decide (if the base cost is that much more) ? Unless it's just not worth the time from a business point of view.. but to me it would drive more sales of your HD units and more likely to keep that customer on a go forward into your higher end goggles (assuming they stick with the hobby and progress) . Anyhow, appreciate the response given my criticism wasn't as polite as you've been.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This DJI new thing is a totally different thing and it requires a large additional investment to buy this alongside with our analog systems. At least for those who'd like to occasionally fly anything smaller than a 5".
I don't think they are competing products. They are way too different in equipment, specs and cost. This fatshark/hd-zero will likely cost around 50-60 bucks for vtx and 120-200 bucks for vrx station. The good thing about the DJI system is that it seems to not crop the image when using it in 4:3 mode. So the picture is likely better suitable for most 5" racers. |
|
Last edited by RadMulRot; Aug 03, 2019 at 03:35 AM.
|
|
|||
|
First video:
|
||
|
|||
|
|
|
Pushing 720p 60fps uncompressed is a shitload of data... how much spectrum is this gonna take up?
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | |||||
Category | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discussion | One Mo Byte 1.9" / 2" micro build | JustPlaneChris | Micro Multirotor Drones | 0 | Mar 22, 2019 10:24 PM |
Discussion | Moon light twinkling off the frost... | rockyboy2 | Life, The Universe, and Politics | 4 | Jan 03, 2018 12:25 PM |
Help! | KK2.1.5 verification error, first mismatch at byte 0x0000 0xff != 0 | avr_0xff | Multirotor Drone Electronics | 0 | Feb 15, 2016 01:39 PM |
New Product | Quattro-Byte & Trilo-Byte | BJADA | Multirotor Drone Talk | 12 | Dec 15, 2011 02:52 PM |