Thread Tools
Sep 03, 2018, 01:56 PM
Registered User
eflightray's Avatar
Thread OP
Discussion

76,000 feet in a glider


Something new to discuss ? (argue ).

76,000 feet in a glider

.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Sep 04, 2018, 07:33 AM
Registered User
Thanks for sharing this.
I didnt even know such a form of soaring is there.
Interesting to see the original site http://www.perlanproject.org

Cheers
Buwa

No comments on the typical, always misleading mainstream mass media though.
Sep 04, 2018, 01:30 PM
Registered User
Video of the record flight:
Perlan 2 Highest Ever Soaring Flight Above 65,000 feet (2 min 5 sec)


Awesome achievement. Waiting for 90k feet goal.
Sep 04, 2018, 06:32 PM
AndyKunz's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidz90
Awesome achievement. Waiting for 90k feet goal.
Would love to see them taking a photo of the bottom side of an SR-71

Andy
Sep 08, 2018, 08:15 AM
Registered User
aeronaut999's Avatar
I think I saw an albatross go by

(kidding!)

Truly amazing
Sep 08, 2018, 08:55 AM
Registered User
richard hanson's Avatar
There I was at 7600 ft and a bird dog flew by————
Sep 10, 2018, 03:59 PM
Electric Coolhunter
Thomas B's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyKunz
Would love to see them taking a photo of the bottom side of an SR-71

Andy
The Perlan would have to also have the ability to travel in time....
Latest blog entry: My 2022 event schedule.
Sep 13, 2018, 08:20 AM
Registered User
GWRIGHT's Avatar
Amazing. wonder how tight the airspeed range is at that altitude for those high aspect ratio wings.

Friend of mine that flew corporate jets said one of the things you have to learn is the tight window of speed you have to maintain at altitude, and it gets tighter the higher you are. one aircraft he flew he said only had something like a 20 knot window in IAS at the altitude they normally cruised at.
Latest blog entry: blog
Sep 13, 2018, 09:51 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by GWRIGHT
Amazing. wonder how tight the airspeed range is at that altitude for those high aspect ratio wings.

Friend of mine that flew corporate jets said one of the things you have to learn is the tight window of speed you have to maintain at altitude, and it gets tighter the higher you are. one aircraft he flew he said only had something like a 20 knot window in IAS at the altitude they normally cruised at.
FYI this called the "Coffin Corner".

Coffin corner (also known as the aerodynamic ceiling or Q corner) is the region of flight where a fast fixed-wing aircraft's stall speed is near the critical Mach number, at a given gross weight and G-force loading (Wikipedia).
Sep 13, 2018, 11:21 AM
Electric Coolhunter
Thomas B's Avatar
The U-2 also operates in a very limited flight envelope at high altitude.
Latest blog entry: My 2022 event schedule.
Sep 13, 2018, 11:22 AM
Registered User
richard hanson's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by fnev
FYI this called the "Coffin Corner".

Coffin corner (also known as the aerodynamic ceiling or Q corner) is the region of flight where a fast fixed-wing aircraft's stall speed is near the critical Mach number, at a given gross weight and G-force loading (Wikipedia).
Passenger stuff commonly fly in this area
Sep 13, 2018, 07:31 PM
Registered User
ShoeDLG's Avatar
It is common for high altitude airplanes to have very little difference in indicated airspeed between stall and maximum airspeed/Mach number. In practice, this turns out not to be a huge deal. At 76,000 ft, 100 knots of indicated airspeed corresponds to 448 knots of true airspeed. 102 knots of indicated airspeed corresponds to 456 knots of true airspeed. The difference in kinetic energy between 100 and 102 knots therefore corresponds to a change in height of 312 ft. So in order to have a 2 knot indicated airspeed excursion, your altitude would have to change by more than 300 ft. At sea level, you’d only need to change altitude by 18 ft in order to see the same change in indicated airspeed. So while the available airspeed gets narrower, the task of staying inside that band gets easier. I had the chance to fly the Perlan simulator, and this effect was very apparent.
Sep 14, 2018, 12:05 AM
Registered User
Yes, ShoeDLG, you are absolutely right. But this is an area where commercial pilots are not necessary well trained for (if getting in troubles). And to make things a bit more "interesting" this is where some airline companies want their pilots to fly as it saves fuel. Recently the Aeroflot pilots went on "strike" to remove incentives "forcing" them to fly in this part of the flight envelop for economic reasons.
Sep 14, 2018, 02:39 AM
launch high, go fast
luvF3b's Avatar
The airfoil profiles seem to be closer to the shape that is utilized for RC scale rather than a full size sailplane. What average Reynolds number is the Perlan flying at at fl 760?
Sep 14, 2018, 10:44 AM
Registered User
richard hanson's Avatar
US and other airline companies hire from military ranks and those incoming pilots typically have experience in supersonic craft


Quick Reply
Message:

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion 90,000 feet...in a glider dll932 Life, The Universe, and Politics 2 Aug 03, 2017 01:23 PM
Discussion Full size glider to fly to 90,000 feet some time soon treehog Life, The Universe, and Politics 14 Sep 28, 2015 10:28 AM
Discussion Glider flight to 90,000 feet! dll932 Life, The Universe, and Politics 2 Sep 27, 2015 10:56 AM
Yippee! FPV IN SPACE - Balloon / Glider Flight to 80,000 Feet !!!! JettPilot FPV Talk 52 Dec 05, 2012 05:49 AM
Cool OT - Paper glider from 90,000 feet c0dem0nkey Slope Soaring 0 Nov 12, 2010 11:40 PM