![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Discussion
VTOL type efficiencies
I thought I would have found at least a few discussions on this subject, but haven't dug up much. I'm curious to the efficiency comparisons of the various popular VTOL types. For example, I usually see a tilt rotor and think of a compromised forward flight propulsion system, since it of course has to be optimized for such a small portion of the flight. In reality, I wonder if the lower motor count/weight makes up for this. Would a variable pitch tilt rotor be the best solution?
This is just one example. I'm interested in people's thoughts and experiences with various configurations. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
I like the idea of a dedicated thread as well. From my perspective with fixed pitch props:
Bicopter Tail Sitter: extremely simple and light lower efficiency in hover if you want to have good control authority good forward flight efficiency because it's just a wing and two motors bad wind resistance Bicopter tilt rotor: can have good efficiency in hover or forward flight, but not as easy to have both minimal tilt mechanisms Dead weight is only the tilt mechanism Tricopter tilt rotor: Same efficiency issues with hover vs forward flight trade off as bicopter either requires an additional tilt mechanism for the third motor, or has a third motor as dead weight Quadcopter tilt rotor: as more rotors are added for tilt rotors things get more complicated and less efficient in forward flight Quadplane: Has good hover and forward flight prop efficiency has 4 motors of dead weight to drag around Pentacopter plane: Has good hover and forward flight prop efficiency Has 3 motors of dead weight to drag around |
|
|
|
|||
|
How about this single motor for efficiency --
and an article on it -- https://www.suasnews.com/2017/06/spl...eid=13417932f1 But then, it could all depend on how you define 'efficiency'. |
||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Quote:
As stated, the question is too vague to be answerable. For hovering alone, the power required is directly, mathematically, related to disk loading (Weight/Disk Area), the lower the better. For forward flight, the common measure of goodness is L/D (Lift over Drag). Neither of these is technically efficiency. Any reasonable design choice also contains elements of cost, simplicity, durability, reliability, etc. If you want an answer, define a specific mission, and be prepared to do a lot of math. That is what the professionals do. |
|
|
||
|
|||||||
|
I think the machine concept sown below has good potential for high hover efficiency and very good forward flight efficiency. In hover this type of design can easily have a low disk loading. In forward flight it is like a powered glider. This may not be a good configuration for all missions, but it has good potential as a duration copter and duration plane .
smaller lower aspect ratio wing version of same concept:
|
||||||
|
Last edited by leadfeather; Sep 07, 2017 at 08:12 PM.
|
||||||
|
|
|
I and another guy had talked much about this same idea ,,, only using some kind of compressed air tip jets ,,, but it never looked like it would be easy so we never did anything on it .... but this is so easy ,,,, well the physical build .. I am sure the software is a night mare .
Very interesting thread ,,, thanks for starting it Flywall |
|
|
|
|
|
No worries, I love this stuff! I think it's interesting that fixed wing VTOL was the red headed step child for so long, with the wheel of failure, or circle of atrocities, or whatever you call it.
Lately, all I seem to hear about is VTOL everything. I enjoy seeing the crazy, out of the norm type designs that really seem to have a legitimate use case (as opposed to the obvious non engineered scams designed to suck investment money out of the market). With so many designs, I thought it would be cool to have a thread dedicated to comparing them, pondering best uses for different designs, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Not a terribly new idea:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focke-...iebfl%C3%BCgel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_Rocket |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | |||||
Category | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Discussion | Does this VTOL type exist? | techspy | VTOLs | 3 | Aug 20, 2017 09:13 AM |
Discussion | What is the longest flight by VTOL aircraft of all types? | Illini_Rob | VTOLs | 9 | Apr 27, 2015 02:36 PM |
Discussion | a more effective & efficient type of stabilization & control | xlcrlee | Nurflügel | 16 | Dec 10, 2012 07:29 AM |
Discussion | Vertigo type VTOL | amsci99 | VTOLs | 5 | Jul 27, 2008 11:17 AM |