FAA Special Rule for RC - More Responses Needed! - RC Groups

FAA Special Rule for RC - More Responses Needed!

Everyone one of us need to let our voices be heard.

Splash

More Comments For The Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft Needed

Updated content from Patrick Egan:

Quote from Jim Williams (FAA UASIO Manager) at Delta Ag Show talks about the numbers of comments the FAA thinks they could get for the sUAS NPRM.

“If we receive 50,000 comments, and we believe it’s possible we will, each of those must be given a disposition before we can proceed with writing the regulations,” he noted. “But we plan to meet the 2015 deadline.”

The Interpretation of the Special Rule for Model Aircraft has been made. This is something we need to take seriously, and we only have until July 25th to comment. The FAA thinks it is possible that they will get 50,000 comments for the sUAS NPRM. There are many of us who enjoy the RC flying hobby. So, let's use 50,000 as a comment goal and hopefully we can preserve our hobby as we know and enjoy it.

Have you left your comment?

Share this story with all of your RC friends so we can get as many comments as possible. Once the FAA gets their toe in the door, they could have adverse effects on all parts of our hobby.

>>Click here to comment now.

Here is a link to the counter.

Thread Tools
Jul 16, 2014, 11:40 AM
Registered User
the counter is frozen.
Last edited by 5 oclock charlie; Jul 16, 2014 at 12:02 PM.
Jul 16, 2014, 11:57 AM
Needs More Go Fast....
MaydayMayday's Avatar
Here is a link to the overview page
http://www.regulations.gov/#!documen...2014-0396-0001

And remember, concise - educated answer.....
Jul 16, 2014, 12:08 PM
Wandering IT geek
ronin4740's Avatar
Submitted. Thanks for the link Mr. Graham.
Jul 16, 2014, 12:15 PM
Warder
NiteWolf1138's Avatar
They've done this to my comment for a while.

Quote:
Comment Tracking Number Match

This comment was received in Regulations.gov but is not yet posted. Please contact the agency directly for more information.
Wonder if they've put a permanent freeze on new comments so that the new minimum won't be reached.
Jul 16, 2014, 12:21 PM
Closed Account
Jim,

was his comment recorded? is there a link anywhere?
Jul 16, 2014, 12:26 PM
AMA 7224
Leadchucker's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiteWolf1138



Wonder if they've put a permanent freeze on new comments so that the new minimum won't be reached.
It wouldn't surprise me one bit. They seem hell bent on defying Congress and appear to have considered themselves above the law. I hope the whole thing falls flat on it's face and the FAA get's investigated.
Jul 16, 2014, 12:26 PM
Admin Deluxe
Jim T. Graham's Avatar
We did find the exact quote (thanks to Patrick Egan):
"If we receive 50,000 comments, and we believe it’s possible we will, each of those must be given a disposition before we can proceed with writing the regulations,” he noted. “But we plan to meet the 2015 deadline.”

Link to the story.
Jul 16, 2014, 12:28 PM
Admin Deluxe
Jim T. Graham's Avatar
I'm curious to see if the number increases in the next 24 hours. We now have a record of today's number. I'm anxious to see what the number is on Thursday, July 17th.
Jul 16, 2014, 12:49 PM
Rocket Programmer
jasmine2501's Avatar
I seem to recall them saying something about that counter not being accurate and not to worry about it. Still, the community response hasn't been what I would expect. Maybe that's why they cried wolf for years on this... that is known to have the effect of reducing public interest. I know a lot of modelers are tired of hearing about it.
Jul 16, 2014, 01:05 PM
Closed Account
The quote "“If we receive 50,000 comments, and we believe it’s possible we will, each of those must be given a disposition before we can proceed with writing the regulations,” he noted. “But we plan to meet the 2015 deadline.” doesn't say they are waiting on 50,000 letters before they'll take notice, it says that regardless of how many they receive they will have to review and process every one.

There's a difference between what you wrote in the first post and what the quote actually indicates. I think that misrepresenting what the FAA's position is will only further erode our future ability as a modeling community to cooperate with the FAA on relevant matters.
Jul 16, 2014, 01:09 PM
Taranis Tyro...
MattyB's Avatar
Is there anything the international community can do, or would it be counterproductive for non-US nationals to sign/send in their views?
Jul 16, 2014, 01:09 PM
Admin Deluxe
Jim T. Graham's Avatar
This is how it was interpreted by Patrick Egan.
Jul 16, 2014, 01:58 PM
Closed Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim T. Graham
This is how it was interpreted by Patrick Egan.
well, there you go.
Jul 16, 2014, 02:06 PM
Registered User
Stratos268's Avatar
I made a comment on the regulations.gov website and this is the response I received.

Your comment will be viewable on Regulations.gov after the agency has reviewed it, which may be an indefinite amount of time. Use your tracking number to find out the status of your comment.

Thought it was kinda funny


Thread Tools