Thread Tools
Mar 13, 2013, 05:06 PM
Registered User
Discussion

Blade SR 6 ch ?


I was wondering if this heli is ok to train for 6 ch operation. I have no plans on 3 d but just started to fly 6 ch. Mcp-x/ Genius c/p for now. Also have Master c/p.
i plan on using DX6i and not stock TX. I believe rx is AR6100 dsm2 and ths will work fine. I know some have had bad issues with this but been flying about a year. Quads FBL 4 ch / sim etc. So any input would be helpful. Cheers/Dan
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Mar 13, 2013, 05:21 PM
Cranky old fart
Balr14's Avatar
OOPS, dbl dbl post post
Mar 13, 2013, 05:21 PM
Cranky old fart
Balr14's Avatar
I don't think you would like it very much. The head design is quite old and you would probably find it sloppy compared to the micros you've been flying. The motor driven tail can be a problem as it has a hard time keeping up sometimes and does a certain amount of hunting. The motor will wear out, too. I've owned several of the previous models and the flybarless micros are more stable.
Mar 14, 2013, 12:23 AM
Registered User
Thanks for reply. I agree about mico FBL helis. Once you get feel for them pretty awesome. SR sounds not to good. Guess break down and reassemble V400D02. FBL 6 ch and improve weak points.
Mar 14, 2013, 08:00 AM
Cranky old fart
Balr14's Avatar
Well, you are a lot younger than me and adapt a lot easier. I'm well beyond the point where I'm looking for new challenges. So, I found myself having to deal with traits that annoyed me, where you may not mind. How about a 300X?
Mar 14, 2013, 08:59 AM
I hate waiting for parts
Mike_Then's Avatar
Yeah I had a couple of Blade SR helis and they aren't as durable as Horizon says they are. While my brushed tail motor never wore out - even after several crashes - it did have a hard time keeping up with the gyro. It just doesn't react fast enough. You never can quite get the "hunt" out of it. It was either hunting or slight drift. And the Blade SR was marketed as a beginner heli and was smaller than the Blade 400, yet parts were more expensive?

Blade makes good helis but you could definitely do better than the SR.
Mar 17, 2013, 11:57 AM
Registered User
SR was pretty bad to learn with parts costs are high and doenst take a crash well
if you have a mCPX i wouldnt bother with it
your better off with a sim
Mar 19, 2013, 11:16 AM
Registered User
I resisted and let it pass. Glad I did as out of date heli. Thanks all for input.
I see no positive input about this heli.
Mar 20, 2013, 09:53 AM
Registered User
As a previous owner of a Blade SR I have to say its certainly not for beginners.
A well setup T-Rex 250 is a much better choice
Mar 22, 2013, 09:43 AM
I hate waiting for parts
Mike_Then's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Essex2visuvesi View Post
As a previous owner of a Blade SR I have to say its certainly not for beginners.
A well setup T-Rex 250 is a much better choice
I don't think a T-Rex 250 is a good choice for beginners. They are very twitchy and expensive to repair... compared to other helis I mean.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold 2 x 450's, 2 x 450 Fuselages, Gyros, Blade SR, Blade 120 SR, 450 parts for sale lockweeze Aircraft - Electric - Helis (FS/W) 9 Mar 26, 2013 07:45 PM
Question Airtronics SD-5G 2.4Ghz 5-Ch Vs.Airtronics SD-6G 2.4Ghz 6-Ch Computer radio NASAFAN101 Dock Talk 6 Mar 14, 2013 08:20 AM
Sold $80 shipped! -- 2.4G Fly-Sky CT6B 6-Ch. Tx with (7) seven 6-Channel Rx's Cobra68 Aircraft - General - Radio Equipment (FS/W) 0 Jan 13, 2013 09:52 PM
For Sale Spektrum SPMAR6400NBL - 6 CH DSM rwp033 Aircraft - Electric - Micro & Indoor Airplanes (FS/W) 0 Jan 03, 2013 07:27 PM
Sold Blade SR HP6DSM 6 ch radio mint $40 shipped to lower 48 SilverHeli2000 Aircraft - General - Radio Equipment (FS/W) 3 Jan 25, 2011 06:24 PM