Thread Tools
Old Jan 30, 2013, 07:06 PM
logan5 is offline
Find More Posts by logan5
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by micro_builder View Post
His reasoning seems to be the same as a person buying a fire extinguisher because they realize there is some chance that a fire could happen. Better safe than sorry is not the same as living in fear. IMO.
Apparently wearing a seatbelt is also living in fear .... Or wearing a helmet for that matter. Heck if risk mitigation is living in fear .... Then why are all the progressives so hellbent for getting free condoms and birth control pills? YOLO!
Old Jan 30, 2013, 07:16 PM
RCWorks is offline
Find More Posts by RCWorks
Happy days are here again!
RCWorks's Avatar
The ammusment parks are full of people living in fear, you never seen so many safety devices and speed limits.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 07:58 PM
wrightme is offline
Find More Posts by wrightme
Trons and Fumes
wrightme's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Adlam View Post
No offence taken - although I don't know why you seem to have problems with people being sympathetic.

Your words seem to say to different things ("I'm not afraid" and "I wish to be armed in case very bad things happen") which leaves one confused.

(It's rather like saying that you are "in fear" might lose your man card, or summat.. )

I suspect you'll just say that it's being 'prepared' - which also doesn't make sense. No-one prepares in such a way unless one is fearful of something bad happening.

Look, it's your life etc - I was just asking questions to try to figure out how it hangs together. I'm just interested / nosy.
The parts in bold should not 'leave one confused.' A person does not need to experience 'fear' to desire to prepare for possibilities.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:02 PM
LVsoaring is offline
Find More Posts by LVsoaring
It's gonna be YUGE!!!
LVsoaring's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00b-E View Post
The laws are fine, enforcement is a joke.
How unsanitary! You took the words right out of my mouth!


Typical liberal logic is on display here.... the laws we have are not properly enforced, so let's pass some more laws that will do nothing to solve the problem, and will only place more burden on the law-abiding citizen.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:05 PM
LVsoaring is offline
Find More Posts by LVsoaring
It's gonna be YUGE!!!
LVsoaring's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Harris View Post
Maybe the problem is a patchwork of local and state laws. Perhaps the solution would be a single set of unified national firearms laws. Heaven forbid, but that is a direction it's headed.

--Bill

I rarely agree with you Bill, but your comment, IMHO, actually has some merit. The patchwork of laws you mention seemed to work pretty well 40, 50, 60 plus years ago. But nowadays our society is so mobile that uniform laws (and uniform enforcement) seems kinda reasonable, or at least worth discussing.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:09 PM
Jacques Flambeau is offline
Find More Posts by Jacques Flambeau
Restful User
Jacques Flambeau's Avatar
Quote:
We already have a single set of unified firearms laws... it says that a citizens right to bear arms shall not be infringed.
Constitutional amendments are not laws.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:13 PM
LVsoaring is offline
Find More Posts by LVsoaring
It's gonna be YUGE!!!
LVsoaring's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Harris View Post
Constitutional amendments are not laws.
Back to disagreeing. But in this case it's not a disagreement. You are simply wrong. To wit:

Article. VI.

All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:18 PM
Jacques Flambeau is offline
Find More Posts by Jacques Flambeau
Restful User
Jacques Flambeau's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVsoaring View Post
I rarely agree with you Bill, but your comment, IMHO, actually has some merit. The patchwork of laws you mention seemed to work pretty well 40, 50, 60 plus years ago. But nowadays our society is so mobile that uniform laws (and uniform enforcement) seems kinda reasonable, or at least worth discussing.
Yes, I think this is why so much is unenforcable-- there is such a Gordian knot of loopholes that even the most agressive, law-an-order magistrate or District Attorney has to tread lightly (or not really stomp). Not good for morale when a miscreant walks on a technicality.

--Bill
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:20 PM
LVsoaring is offline
Find More Posts by LVsoaring
It's gonna be YUGE!!!
LVsoaring's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Harris View Post
Yes, I think this is why so much is unenforcable-- there is such a Gordian knot of loopholes that even the most agressive, law-an-order magistrate or District Attorney has to tread lightly (or not really stomp). Not good for morale when a miscreant walks on a technicality.

--Bill
Gordian knot..... had to look that up. Yes, we're back to agreeing. Good post.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:21 PM
Jacques Flambeau is offline
Find More Posts by Jacques Flambeau
Restful User
Jacques Flambeau's Avatar
Quote:
Back to disagreeing. But in this case it's not a disagreement. You are simply wrong. To wit:
Well-- semantics. The Constitution is the Law of the Land, but not laws or regulations. It is the basis for all law, but not a law.

I agree with you, but tend to be picky on details.

--Bill
Old Jan 30, 2013, 08:23 PM
LVsoaring is offline
Find More Posts by LVsoaring
It's gonna be YUGE!!!
LVsoaring's Avatar
call it semantics if you wish.... when it says "shall be the supreme law of the land", it doesn't seem to have much wiggle room for loose interpretation.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Looking forward to more comments tomorrow.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 09:37 PM
logan5 is offline
Find More Posts by logan5
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVsoaring View Post
call it semantics if you wish.... when it says "shall be the supreme law of the land", it doesn't seem to have much wiggle room for loose interpretation.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Looking forward to more comments tomorrow.
He's a progressive .... Everything in his opinion is open to lose interpretation.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 10:15 PM
Colt SAA is offline
Find More Posts by Colt SAA
One of the Deplorables
Colt SAA's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by n00b-E View Post
The laws are fine, enforcement is a joke.
This.
Old Jan 30, 2013, 11:26 PM
Jacques Flambeau is offline
Find More Posts by Jacques Flambeau
Restful User
Jacques Flambeau's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by LVsoaring View Post
call it semantics if you wish.... when it says "shall be the supreme law of the land", it doesn't seem to have much wiggle room for loose interpretation.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Looking forward to more comments tomorrow.
Well, yes. We could go back and forth all day, but in the end, it works and work long after we're gone...

Old Jan 31, 2013, 05:07 AM
Norman Adlam is online now
Find More Posts by Norman Adlam
Official Old Git!
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5 View Post
You might want to consider your wife's safety as well .... The UK has a higher rate of rape per 100000 than here in the US .... At least here we can chose to do something about it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics
Well, it hasn't happened - or come anywhere near the vaguest possibility from what I know - in 63 years logan5!

How much 'preparation' do you think I might need to take?


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help! GoPro Hero 2 Live Video Out Examples... RxFPV FPV Talk 28 Jan 03, 2013 09:45 PM
Discussion Just another example of Government and Corporations working hand in hand ... logan5 Life, The Universe, and Politics 1 Nov 17, 2011 12:51 PM
Discussion Watch the other hand... Obama and new gun laws rcjetpilot Life, The Universe, and Politics 179 Mar 30, 2011 08:54 PM
Discussion Swiss voters throw out gun law reform aerogel Life, The Universe, and Politics 21 Feb 16, 2011 08:15 PM
Discussion Yet another example of how the militarization of our Police has failed... FrogChief Life, The Universe, and Politics 63 May 21, 2010 08:48 AM