Thread Tools
Feb 24, 2013, 03:37 PM
Registered User
tailskid2's Avatar
Agreed Rcflyyer1, now all we need is a KIT (ya know with balsa wood) of a Dauntless...maybe 80+"????
Latest blog entry: The FW190 is back!
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Feb 24, 2013, 04:47 PM
Registered User
TripleW's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rcflyyer1 View Post
Great job with the review. It's amazing what these foamies are starting to look like. When I saw the first picture, I thought it was a giant scale gasser! Amazing scale detail and I bet this will be a good seller since there aren't any or many dauntless foamies for sale.
There is the Windrider dauntless.
http://www.atlantahobby.com/Store/pc...dproduct=15163


Tailskid is 73 inches big enough?
http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/items/ESMSBD5-71FAF.html
Feb 24, 2013, 04:55 PM
Registered User
tailskid2's Avatar
"Tailskid is 73 inches big enough?
http://www.troybuiltmodels.com/items/ESMSBD5-71FAF.html "

Nice size....and nice selection of gas engines....but it is an ARF

{still might take a second look at it}
Latest blog entry: The FW190 is back!
Feb 26, 2013, 01:23 AM
Registered User
I sure was wondering why it's called "Giant". Comparing it to a ultra micro maybe?
Mar 05, 2013, 08:13 PM
RC Flier
radcon56's Avatar
My first thought was that there might be other planes in the $300 range that would be better, especially the tx. Still not a bad rig for the money.
Mar 09, 2013, 02:49 AM
Scratch building addict
rotagen's Avatar
Nice looking plane I wish I had a field large enough for it.
Mar 15, 2013, 01:49 PM
Registered User
Michael Heer's Avatar
Took this plane to a school demo today and I almost held my dive a little too long...but it impressed the heck out of everyone...myself included when she did pull out and track across the field at full throttle about five feet above the field. She does look great in a dive! I did a very nice helicopter flight to end the demonstration but the kids were still talking about the dive bomber. Well I better get to work. Mike
Mar 19, 2013, 10:37 PM
Webmaster, MMCNE
Good review-- very informative.

What's with the "drop tanks"? They look ridiculous! I'm a big SBD fan, and I've never seen anything like that under the wing of an SBD. The SBD had small bomb racks under the outer wing panels, that could carry up to 100 pound bombs. (At roughly six pounds a gallon, that would only be 17 gallons, but they weren't plumbed for gas tanks!)

My other complaint is with the typical sloppiness and inattention to detail in terms of the history and color scheme you find in many ARFs. The kit claims to be an SBD-5, which makes it a late war plane, while the color scheme is the classic SBD-3 "2-S-12" from the battle of the Coral Sea in early 1942. The red center national insignia was gone by the Battle of Midway in June of '42.

An SBD-5 would be in overall gloss sea blue.....
Last edited by RCBoater; Mar 19, 2013 at 10:38 PM. Reason: fix typos
Mar 26, 2013, 01:16 PM
Registered User
Michael Heer's Avatar
As mentioned in the article, according to my Navy friend the Navy version did not use drop tanks. The Army version may have but we have seen no evidence of it. Yes the color scheme is wrong for the 5 series. The red dot disappeared early in the war so as not to cause out people on the ground to shoot at it thinking it was a Japanese "Meatball" marking. Aside from that the plane remains a great flyer and I remain very happy with mine. Mike Heer
Apr 09, 2013, 10:53 AM
Scott Walsh
snakeplissken81's Avatar
Great review, thanks for posting. I'm a fan of this plane. Tell me though, how detailed is the cockpit areas?
Nov 07, 2013, 12:09 AM
Registered User

Rear Canopy?


Quote:
Originally Posted by snakeplissken81 View Post
Great review, thanks for posting. I'm a fan of this plane. Tell me though, how detailed is thhat the rear gunse cockpit areas?
I don't think the rearmost canopy segment on the model is correct. I've looked at the rear gun treatment on the model, compared it to many pics of the real airplane. It looks as though the rear gun, or guns, and their mount had to be stowed away in order for the rearmost canopy segment to be closed. When the gun mount is deployed, the rear canopy segments are stowed under the fixed portion of the greenhouse.

Comments are solicited.
Nov 08, 2013, 04:01 PM
Parkstormer!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charley38 View Post
I don't think the rearmost canopy segment on the model is correct. I've looked at the rear gun treatment on the model, compared it to many pics of the real airplane. It looks as though the rear gun, or guns, and their mount had to be stowed away in order for the rearmost canopy segment to be closed. When the gun mount is deployed, the rear canopy segments are stowed under the fixed portion of the greenhouse.

Comments are solicited.
That's my understanding also . . .
Dec 20, 2013, 09:40 PM
Uncontrold flight into terrain
You are both correct. The aft canopy was fully open when the gun is deployed. I also noticed in some pics that often the forward canopy is open in flight too.

I recently bought this bird from Motion RC and it's a sweet looking foamie. I also ordered the Freewing engine sound system for less than $70 but not sure if I want to put it in the SBD since I hate to cut a hole in such a nice bird.

The system comes with two oval speakers so right now I have one in my Tower Hellcat and the other in an FZ Beaver and switch out the sound unit and amp between models.
Jan 08, 2014, 12:34 PM
Registered User

Sbd


Appreciate the review. Just returned to hobby after 25 years, and am only 3 months into warbird foamies.

The dive brakes are indeed a problem. I loosened the screws on servo arms and tried (not having any idea as to whether it might help) clamping the flaps into the proper position for a few days. There was slight improvement.

Then I manually opened the flaps and put the lower one in the proper position and clamped a support to hold it there. I slowly closed the upper one and found that at about 1/4 inch opening, a piece of paper placed all the way to the leading edge, could not be pulled out if I placed pressure on the upper flap.

My thinking is that the areas where the bevel begins at the leading edge of the flaps are interfering with proper closing, and I'm thinking of manually opening them as wide as I can and using something like an emery board to reduce both the upper and lower areas of contacts.

Do you have any thoughts on this approach?

Thanks,
Jan 08, 2014, 07:43 PM
Registered User
Worried about nose-overs on my bumpy grass field. What's the diameter of the main wheels?

CR


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Product Freewing SBD Dauntless Mikey 68 Electric Warbirds 882 Jan 30, 2017 12:36 PM
Discussion Banana Hobby SBD Dauntless 619SixFour Electric Warbirds 7 Sep 14, 2012 09:39 AM
Sold Windrider SBD Dauntless kit NIB.(EPS version) bouncebk2003 Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 6 Apr 29, 2012 07:18 PM
Discussion ESM SBD Dauntless Dimensions paulhlee Scale ARF/RTF 0 Mar 16, 2012 07:09 PM
Wanted Giant scale Hellcat or SBD Dauntless TOTGA Aircraft - Fuel - Airplanes (FS/W) 0 Sep 22, 2008 10:54 PM