New Products Flash Sale
Thread Tools
Old Dec 10, 2012, 09:18 PM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User

Correction


Most American companies can do a good job making their products.

Until a Chinese government subsidized industry comes after our companies in the same field.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Dec 10, 2012, 09:29 PM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User

Lets see ?


We could not produce a LIFEPO4 battery after pork barrelling away close to a billion dollars of money.

Now the chief director of battery designs says we can design a battery 25 times better than anything available today ?? He must be on drugs to make such a STUPID statement after the way A123 played out.

If it worked the first time ? Keep doing the same thing untill they catch up to our
Old Dec 10, 2012, 11:51 PM
rebell is offline
Find More Posts by rebell
JustFlying
rebell's Avatar
Why do the Chinese always get the blame for other's failures?
Old Dec 11, 2012, 04:26 AM
desertstalker is offline
Find More Posts by desertstalker
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebell View Post
Why do the Chinese always get the blame for other's failures?
Bigotry, nothing is worse than successful foreigners.
Old Dec 11, 2012, 08:12 AM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User
Slavery, at minus wages, keeps the top richest people happy.

Life is always good up there.
Old Dec 11, 2012, 08:31 AM
JohnathanSwift is offline
Find More Posts by JohnathanSwift
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebell View Post
Why do the Chinese always get the blame for other's failures?
Hm, I think you have inverted cause and effect.

So, is it your position that intellectual property is "safe" in "China?"
Old Dec 11, 2012, 08:59 AM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User
At least the safe improvement will be put to use.
Old Dec 11, 2012, 10:52 AM
rebell is offline
Find More Posts by rebell
JustFlying
rebell's Avatar
Wow!!! What are you people talking about? Didn’t you read the article???

The A123 company was bankrupt because of whoever was involved caused it to be a failure, even with the $249.1 million federal grant. Was the “intellectual property” and “financial property” (grant) “safe” in the USA? Who was the actual beneficiaries? Then the Chinese bought it at the bankrupt auction held in Chicago. So, now the company with all its assets, including intellectual property, belongs to them, the Chinese. ... !!!

From the article:
“Chinese firm Wanxiang emerged as the winning bidder of bankrupt battery-maker A123's assets after a days long auction that lasted until nearly 4 a.m. Saturday.”

”The Wanxiang purchase of A123 marks the second major foreign purchase of a U.S. battery company backed by Department of Energy funding.”

And it does not stop there:

”Just over a week ago Energy Secretary Steven Chu came to Chicago to announce that the DOE would spend an additional $120 million to enhance battery technology at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Lemont. ”

Something fishy!

If you want to you talk about “slavery”, start talking with your own high rated businessmen. How many of them in all categories of business, including the RC business, take their manufacturing to China?

I ask again: Why do the Chinese always get the blame for other's failures?


BTW, the A123 company started with a lot of legal fights about who it actually belonged to
Old Dec 11, 2012, 11:00 AM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User
MIT ?

The sweet smell of selling out to the highest buck.
Old Dec 11, 2012, 11:18 AM
JohnathanSwift is offline
Find More Posts by JohnathanSwift
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebell View Post
Wow!!! What are you people talking about? Didn’t you read the article???

The A123 company was bankrupt because of whoever was involved caused it to be a failure, even with the $249.1 million federal grant. Was the “intellectual property” and “financial property” (grant) “safe” in the USA? Who was the actual beneficiaries? Then the Chinese bought it at the bankrupt auction held in Chicago. So, now the company with all its assets, including intellectual property, belongs to them, the Chinese. ... !!!

From the article:
“Chinese firm Wanxiang emerged as the winning bidder of bankrupt battery-maker A123's assets after a days long auction that lasted until nearly 4 a.m. Saturday.”

”The Wanxiang purchase of A123 marks the second major foreign purchase of a U.S. battery company backed by Department of Energy funding.”

And it does not stop there:

”Just over a week ago Energy Secretary Steven Chu came to Chicago to announce that the DOE would spend an additional $120 million to enhance battery technology at Argonne National Laboratory in suburban Lemont. ”

Something fishy!

If you want to you talk about “slavery”, start talking with your own high rated businessmen. How many of them in all categories of business, including the RC business, take their manufacturing to China?

I ask again: Why do the Chinese always get the blame for other's failures?


BTW, the A123 company started with a lot of legal fights about who it actually belonged to
Of course we read the article!

Yes, in this instance the intellectual property was lawfully acquired, but, again, I would ask rhetorically, is intellectual property "safe" in China?

This transaction is the exception, not the "norm" in my view since, for once, it was "cheaper" to lawfully acquire the IP than to steal it.
Old Dec 11, 2012, 11:33 AM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User
It sure was not safe in the U S A.
A123 put factories anywhere it could to pee away the money .
Old Dec 11, 2012, 11:34 AM
JohnathanSwift is offline
Find More Posts by JohnathanSwift
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclops2 View Post
It sure was not safe in the U S A.
A123 put factories anywhere it could to pee away the money .
Of course the IP was "safe" in the U.S.: what do you think an infringement action is all about?

Let's not confuse poor or unsound business judgment with a fully-functioning judiciary which protects the IP of those who seek it!
Old Dec 11, 2012, 12:06 PM
Dereck is offline
Find More Posts by Dereck
Visitor from Reality
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclops2 View Post
We destroyed the A123 battery fortunes in America by greedy speculators, incompetant bussiness leaders, bloated saleries of top management & the creation of a federal pork barrel. It has never been competitive in anything except raising taxes & peeing it away to very savy Asians with a good work ethic.

Garbage in.....garbage out. Plus expenses of course.
I believe it's called 'Capitalism'.

Or it might be 'communism' or 'whatever the Chinese government method is called'.

The only real solution is to only vote in people who will split all the money in the country into an equal share for every citizen and also make large pickup trucks with oversized wheels and gun racks free to all citizens who wear ballcaps continuously

That's called sarcasm. Bazinga!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...,2047216.story

Oops, sorry. Wrong Very Important National News.

There's a piece in the Chicago Tribune (and, one imagines, many other local papers) concerning how A123 is not getting about half of its government handout on account of how it's now going to be owned by another government. Should save enough to re-decorate that public housing complex on PA Ave in DC after they take down the HalThankBlackMas trees and stuff.

Unfortunately, despite the Trib reckoning it to be switched on online, it's only in the paper version and we're off out, so you can't come around and read my copy.

Still, if we get bigger capacity/same size A123s for e-flight, some of us will feel better. For one, I'd love to go back to batteries you just stuff electricity into one end of, then go fly. Sometimes I miss my NiMh packs...

D
Old Dec 11, 2012, 12:09 PM
cyclops2 is offline
Find More Posts by cyclops2
Registered User
Save the Nitro fuel / gasoline ?
Old Dec 11, 2012, 12:20 PM
JohnathanSwift is offline
Find More Posts by JohnathanSwift
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dereck View Post
I believe it's called 'Capitalism'.

Or it might be 'communism' or 'whatever the Chinese government method is called'.

The only real solution is to only vote in people who will split all the money in the country into an equal share for every citizen and also make large pickup trucks with oversized wheels and gun racks free to all citizens who wear ballcaps continuously

That's called sarcasm. Bazinga!

http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...,2047216.story

Oops, sorry. Wrong Very Important National News.

There's a piece in the Chicago Tribune (and, one imagines, many other local papers) concerning how A123 is not getting about half of its government handout on account of how it's now going to be owned by another government. Should save enough to re-decorate that public housing complex on PA Ave in DC after they take down the HalThankBlackMas trees and stuff.

Unfortunately, despite the Trib reckoning it to be switched on online, it's only in the paper version and we're off out, so you can't come around and read my copy.

Still, if we get bigger capacity/same size A123s for e-flight, some of us will feel better. For one, I'd love to go back to batteries you just stuff electricity into one end of, then go fly. Sometimes I miss my NiMh packs...

D
Better still, the trustee in bankruptcy should go after the circus clowns (officers and directors) who drove the ship onto the rocks!


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Ccharging A123 cell on PL8 LiftOff FMA Direct 3 Jan 10, 2013 07:12 AM
Discussion on board tacho the cheap way old4570 Electric Heli Talk 0 May 17, 2012 04:37 AM
Discussion Is there a cheap way to charge a 4S A123? Bugman Jeff Batteries and Chargers 19 Mar 11, 2008 09:20 PM
Discussion New way to buy A123 cells coming rick0007 Batteries and Chargers 14 Aug 18, 2007 02:53 AM
Discussion Bad a123 cell: Best way to test with 1010C UAVProducts Batteries and Chargers 0 Mar 04, 2007 07:38 PM