Would It Be Better for America if Corporations Paid Higher Taxes or Higher Wages? - Page 2 - RC Groups
Thread Tools
Dec 04, 2012, 09:15 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492
That is actually retention pay to keep the key execs around while liquidating the company. It's a common and smart thing to do.
I say promise them the bonuses at the end of the bankruptcy, and then cheat them out of the bonuses just like they did the worker's pension's.
Dec 04, 2012, 09:17 PM
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere
RumRunner_1492's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder1
I say promise them the bonuses at the end of the bankruptcy, and then cheat them out of the bonuses just like they did the worker's pension's.
Then there would be no execs there. Hence the retention pay. How about the union members who went on strike pay for the christmas gifts for all of the other employees families that they destroyed Christmas and their careers for?
Dec 04, 2012, 09:27 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492
Then there would be no execs there. Hence the retention pay. How about the union members who went on strike pay for the christmas gifts for all of the other employees families that they destroyed Christmas and their careers for?
No execs might be better than the execs leading their company into bankruptcy.

I'd bet they'd go for the Christmans presents thing if those getting the Christmas presents contribute their pay for the promised pensions.
Dec 04, 2012, 09:33 PM
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere
RumRunner_1492's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder1
No execs might be better than the execs leading their company into bankruptcy.

I'd bet they'd go for the Christmans presents thing if those getting the Christmas presents contribute their pay for the promised pensions.
Why would the other 10,000 union members out of a job contribute to their pensions? The smaller group of union members stabbed their brothers in the back and sent them packing over the holidays without a job.
Dec 04, 2012, 09:41 PM
Random Pic #23982
Indiana_Geoff's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyzwell
Here's one theory. "If American companies were willing to trade off some of their current earnings growth to make investments in wage increases and hiring, American workers would have more money to spend. And as American workers spent more money, the economy would begin to grow more quickly again. And the growing economy would help the companies begin to grow more quickly again. And so on."

Higher taxes could mean higher prices too, but then there's that whole bureaucracy thing.
That theory is crap.
Dec 04, 2012, 09:49 PM
Registered User
flyzwell's Avatar
Well, I am asking for opinions. Thanks for the insight.
Dec 04, 2012, 11:27 PM
Really?
dll932's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana_Geoff
That theory is crap.
I'm not so sure. To me, sacrificing a little profit to ensure success down the road makes sense-it did to Henry Ford when he decided to pay his employees more so they could buy his cars. Also, how much profit is ENOUGH?
Dec 04, 2012, 11:45 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492
Why would the other 10,000 union members out of a job contribute to their pensions? The smaller group of union members stabbed their brothers in the back and sent them packing over the holidays without a job.
And a smaller group of execs stabbed that group in the back, first. See how that works?
Dec 05, 2012, 12:37 AM
Registered User
flyzwell's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dll932
I'm not so sure. To me, sacrificing a little profit to ensure success down the road makes sense-it did to Henry Ford when he decided to pay his employees more so they could buy his cars. Also, how much profit is ENOUGH?
That makes sense. Higher wages means more disposable income to buy more products which then returns to the companies bottom line.
It would also generate more money for taxes that the middle class wouldn't be able to hide over seas or deduct using loopholes.

How much profit is ENOUGH? Good question. We as a country were a lot better off when the divergence between profits and wages were closer.
Dec 05, 2012, 08:58 AM
Libertas in Infinitum
logan5's Avatar
Some people would say "Both" ... but you can't have both and have a healthy company that grows and expands.
Dec 05, 2012, 09:02 AM
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere
RumRunner_1492's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder1
And a smaller group of execs stabbed that group in the back, first. See how that works?
The execs didn't shut down the place. That is squarely on the bakers union. If not for them everyone would be at work today and buying presents this weekend for under the christmas tree. Those 5k people took that away from the other 13k. Not to mention the BK court supported the pension move so it's really thier blame and not the execs at this point.
Dec 05, 2012, 09:05 AM
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere
RumRunner_1492's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyzwell
That makes sense. Higher wages means more disposable income to buy more products which then returns to the companies bottom line.
It would also generate more money for taxes that the middle class wouldn't be able to hide over seas or deduct using loopholes.

How much profit is ENOUGH? Good question. We as a country were a lot better off when the divergence between profits and wages were closer.
What makes you think increased wages will magically appear back on the companies bottom line? That will not happen. For some companies it will and for many it will not.
Dec 05, 2012, 09:10 AM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dll932
Also, how much profit is ENOUGH?
Over five times your initial investment in five years. Venture capitalists won't invest in your company, unless they can get that much because, of their risk.
Dec 05, 2012, 09:46 AM
Really?
dll932's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by logan5
Some people would say "Both" ... but you can't have both and have a healthy company that grows and expands.
Leads to another question-how much GROWTH is enough, and how much is PRACTICAL?
Dec 05, 2012, 09:47 AM
Really?
dll932's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsci_guy
Over five times your initial investment in five years. Venture capitalists won't invest in your company, unless they can get that much because, of their risk.
That sounds too limited to me and not considering enough factors.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Is Payroll Tax for Social Security Ending and Will It All Be Paid By the Employer? LcJ Life, The Universe, and Politics 9 Feb 16, 2012 02:39 PM
Discussion Maybe if Obamites paid their taxes we could....... LcJ Life, The Universe, and Politics 5 Sep 10, 2010 05:50 PM
Discussion I miss president Bush, Things would be better if....? Bilbobaker Life, The Universe, and Politics 241 Aug 26, 2010 08:25 PM
Discussion Would NiMH be better if they had more voltage? BowerR64 Batteries and Chargers 3 Apr 18, 2007 03:36 AM
Wanted Green Laser!!(Blue would be nice;) The higher the _mW, the better. Corbin_Dallas Non R/C Items (FS/W) 0 Sep 28, 2006 12:09 PM