The world needs China to make a copy of the MPX Sonic Liner! What do you think? - Page 26 - RC Groups
View Poll Results: Are you interested in a Multiplex Sonic Liner clone?
I'd strongly consider buying one 77 55.00%
I would possibly consider buying one 31 22.14%
no interest 29 20.71%
other thoughts- explain in your post 3 2.14%
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Jan 02, 2013, 12:39 AM
I'm All Thumbs
AirBornOne's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonic liner
-1 on closing the two threads

Pete
Yah but we can tell your biased
J
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jan 02, 2013, 10:13 PM
Thanks Wilber and Orville !.
sonic liner's Avatar

Lol !.


+1 on being biased

Pete
Jan 09, 2013, 05:47 AM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonic liner
+1 on being biased

Pete
Pete,
Are you getting much flying time in on yours these days?
How does the air frame handle wind?
Jan 09, 2013, 10:03 AM
Registered User
mike_o's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Pete,
Are you getting much flying time in on yours these days?
How does the air frame handle wind?
I'm not Pete but I'll comment anyway; I find the SL quite tolerant to winds. perhaps not quite as much as f.i. the FunJet, but still. I actually prefer flying the Sl in some wind, as this adds a safety margin to the launch

Despite being built light and having a rather curved and full wing profile, my SL also flies pretty fast, which helps in windy conditions. The downwind legs are fast though.

I have noticed that on fast plane LOS flight, on-board camera videos tend to display constant banking. The pilot has to keep turning to prevent the plane from disappearing from sight. My SL videos are no exception to that....
Jan 09, 2013, 08:20 PM
Registered User
GoatZilla's Avatar
Things have changed since 2003. Let's face it -- Speed 400 motors are pretty damn heavy, not to mention the NiMH's.

It's a matter of size -- it's much easier/cheaper now to get the larger brushless motors of this size, and the lithium batteries to go with them. This alone will easily shave a significant amount of weight off.

The long fuse makes it interesting for payload purposes, and more people are flying with interesting payloads nowadays (e.g. cameras).

The model was pretty damn large, and people weren't quite ready for foamies of this scale back then. They're much more accustomed to large foamies now that the foamie stigma has worn/died off.

This would be would be a neat model for a Chinese manufacturer to pick up and improve upon.
Jan 09, 2013, 09:31 PM
Thanks Wilber and Orville !.
sonic liner's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_o
I'm not Pete but I'll comment anyway; I find the SL quite tolerant to winds. perhaps not quite as much as f.i. the FunJet, but still. I actually prefer flying the Sl in some wind, as this adds a safety margin to the launch

Despite being built light and having a rather curved and full wing profile, my SL also flies pretty fast, which helps in windy conditions. The downwind legs are fast though.

I have noticed that on fast plane LOS flight, on-board camera videos tend to display constant banking. The pilot has to keep turning to prevent the plane from disappearing from sight. My SL videos are no exception to that....
Mirrored thoughts.........Thanks Mike-o

I havent been flying much as of late. Only small heli's in the house and back yard. We are actually in a cold snap right now.....LOL if their is such a thing.
I plan on airing the twins out this spring though, as I just renewed my AMA and Tomcats memberships. Thanks for asking !.

Pete
Jan 16, 2013, 07:36 AM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_o
I'm not Pete but I'll comment anyway; I find the SL quite tolerant to winds. perhaps not quite as much as f.i. the FunJet, but still. I actually prefer flying the Sl in some wind, as this adds a safety margin to the launch

Despite being built light and having a rather curved and full wing profile, my SL also flies pretty fast, which helps in windy conditions. The downwind legs are fast though.

I have noticed that on fast plane LOS flight, on-board camera videos tend to display constant banking. The pilot has to keep turning to prevent the plane from disappearing from sight. My SL videos are no exception to that....
Wow...my jealousy has been raised three points! Your SL experience sounds superb.



Quote:
Originally Posted by GoatZilla
Things have changed since 2003. Let's face it -- Speed 400 motors are pretty damn heavy, not to mention the NiMH's.

It's a matter of size -- it's much easier/cheaper now to get the larger brushless motors of this size, and the lithium batteries to go with them. This alone will easily shave a significant amount of weight off.

The long fuse makes it interesting for payload purposes, and more people are flying with interesting payloads nowadays (e.g. cameras).

The model was pretty damn large, and people weren't quite ready for foamies of this scale back then. They're much more accustomed to large foamies now that the foamie stigma has worn/died off.

This would be would be a neat model for a Chinese manufacturer to pick up and improve upon.
GoatZilla nailed it!
Jan 16, 2013, 07:44 AM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Oops...double post.
Last edited by MRGTX; Jan 16, 2013 at 07:45 AM. Reason: double post
Jan 20, 2013, 02:15 AM
foamie re-cycler
daddiozz's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by BLAZE WON
i think thats the point here. 6,192 views and only 66 in favor of making it again. the #s dont lie.
No,only 72 people out of nearly 7000 views chose to participate in the poll by indicating they may buy one should it become available again.That still leaves 7000 that showed interest ...thats the number that you should pay attention to.There may well be hundreds if not thousands that might buy that didn't bother to participate.Only 31 people participated in the discussion,where did the other votes come from?
Last edited by daddiozz; Jan 20, 2013 at 02:22 AM.
Jan 20, 2013, 03:23 AM
Registered User
Jurgen Heilig's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by daddiozz
... That still leaves 7000 that showed interest ...thats the number that you should pay attention to ...
Only 31 people participated in the discussion,where did the other votes come from?
That's no how the view counter works. Every time you open this thread, change the page or refresh it, counts as a view. Haven't you noticed the reduced growth in views since I have stopped taking part in this discussion?

Only 31 people participated in the discussion. Some may have just looked and clicked to vote. The majority of viewers probably could not care less and neither left a vote, nor participated in the discussion.

Jürgen
Jan 20, 2013, 10:41 AM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgen Heilig
That's no how the view counter works. Every time you open this thread, change the page or refresh it, counts as a view. Haven't you noticed the reduced growth in views since I have stopped taking part in this discussion?

Only 31 people participated in the discussion. Some may have just looked and clicked to vote. The majority of viewers probably could not care less and neither left a vote, nor participated in the discussion.

Jürgen
Welcome back. I thought your personal vendetta against this plane had expired.

Thanks for the bump though.
Jan 20, 2013, 01:22 PM
Registered User
Jurgen Heilig's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Welcome back. I thought your personal vendetta against this plane had expired.
What makes you think that "I would have a personal vendetta against the Sonic Liner? I never wrote anything negative against the model and I have an untouched kit in my collection.

Jürgen
Jan 20, 2013, 01:36 PM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgen Heilig
...I have an untouched kit in my collection.

Jürgen
Ahh...this why you're so negative on the idea of a clone or reissue.

Jan 20, 2013, 01:53 PM
Registered User
Jurgen Heilig's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Ahh...this why you're so negative on the idea of a clone or reissue.

Pretty weird thoughts. I never considered the Sonic Liner a collectors item. I bought myself a kit when they were offered well below list price. Same with the Twister by the way.

Jürgen
Jan 20, 2013, 04:45 PM
Registered User
MRGTX's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgen Heilig
Pretty weird thoughts. I never considered the Sonic Liner a collectors item.

Jürgen
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurgen Heilig
I have an untouched kit in my collection.

Jürgen
Pretty weird thoughts.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Do you spend more time thinking about spending money or making money ? Usta Bee Life, The Universe, and Politics 30 Sep 02, 2014 06:52 PM
Question What do you do to your Duraplane Trainer 40 to make sure wing stays aligned? trevorcgross Combat 5 Oct 11, 2012 09:51 AM
Discussion Banana and fms. What do you think you are doing? kusunokimasahige Banana Hobby 36 Jul 20, 2012 03:00 PM
Discussion what do you guys think of u can do 3d Evan03 Fuel Plane Talk 15 Apr 30, 2012 12:11 AM
Discussion What do you think about this? Conversion to Lipo on Sumo 1/24 AmazingRCstore Micro Cars 0 Feb 25, 2012 03:18 PM