Thread Tools
Old Dec 07, 2012, 01:15 PM
Cap_n_Dave is offline
Find More Posts by Cap_n_Dave
Registered User
I'm curious as to why some think that the dynamic stability theory, math, etc., developed for full-scale aviation are not applicable to our aircraft?

Are we waving our hands and using the excuse of Reynolds number? Or is it something else?
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Dec 07, 2012, 01:23 PM
Francesco is offline
Find More Posts by Francesco
Registered User
Francesco's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cap_n_Dave View Post
I'm curious as to why some think that the dynamic stability theory, math, etc., developed for full-scale aviation are not applicable to our aircraft?

Are we waving our hands and using the excuse of Reynolds number? Or is it something else?
They are, AFAIK. Dynamic modal analysis has been around, for models, for a fair amount of time, first with AVL then with XFLR5.
Old Dec 07, 2012, 01:34 PM
Cap_n_Dave is offline
Find More Posts by Cap_n_Dave
Registered User
So then why is there any controversy about the dive test and CG position?
Old Dec 07, 2012, 02:46 PM
cityevader is online now
Find More Posts by cityevader
IT'S NOSE HEAVY!!!!!!!
cityevader's Avatar
umm...perhaps because some of us (like me) are completely ignorant of anything except what we can visually experience.
Old Dec 07, 2012, 03:06 PM
dwells is offline
Find More Posts by dwells
≡LSF8067≡
dwells's Avatar
Here's a little diagram I found somewhere to help muddy the water a little . Actually a good visual.....
Old Dec 07, 2012, 05:02 PM
MrE is offline
MrE
Find More Posts by MrE
MrE
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cap_n_Dave View Post
So then why is there any controversy about the dive test and CG position?
Im not sure which controversy your talking about and Im also not familiar with the math of dynamic stability. Could you explain what you mean?
Old Dec 07, 2012, 06:11 PM
Cap_n_Dave is offline
Find More Posts by Cap_n_Dave
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrE View Post
Im not sure which controversy your talking about and Im also not familiar with the math of dynamic stability. Could you explain what you mean?
The controversy ... some people think the dive test is not useful. I haven't read the other threads, but the phrase 'downwind turn' was invoked and that subject is controversial because some insist it is a ' problem' and other insist it isn't. I am assuming there are charge opinions about the dive test.

The math ... I can' t tell you how to derive the equations from first principles (that leaked out of my ears many years ago), but I can give you the equations (I have to find my notes...will post later tonight or tomorrow). I am thinking that things won't be any clearer after it's all said an done.
Old Dec 08, 2012, 11:56 AM
jcstalls is online now
Find More Posts by jcstalls
Dragons, WindMills, all Same
jcstalls's Avatar
Mmm, I prefer the inverted downwind low altitude in sink dive test myself.

Jared
RCG Plus Member
Old Dec 08, 2012, 01:17 PM
HerkS is offline
Find More Posts by HerkS
Herk
HerkS's Avatar
Ok model has now been retrimmed for very high speed

What is the aerodynamic decalage now

Rhetorical question - long winded responses not required.
Old Dec 08, 2012, 10:58 PM
AMBeck is offline
Find More Posts by AMBeck
Registered User
AMBeck's Avatar
It's lower. You changed the zero lift angle of the horizontal stabilizer by pushing forward on the stick. The zero lift line drawn along the fuselage should be redrawn closer to the wing.
Old Dec 08, 2012, 11:29 PM
cityevader is online now
Find More Posts by cityevader
IT'S NOSE HEAVY!!!!!!!
cityevader's Avatar
can I be silly and further muddle things and change it to, say, an Alula-style flying wing?
Well, not really, unless someone really really wants to

I applied all y'all's wonderful info to the maiden flights of my new Alula on the slopes today. I almost didn't even build it after flying my buddy's and not liking it's flight responses at all. After getting mine dialed in, we focused attention on his, and not long after, we both had nice flying planes!!!
Old Dec 09, 2012, 07:39 AM
HerkS is offline
Find More Posts by HerkS
Herk
HerkS's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMBeck View Post
It's lower. You changed the zero lift angle of the horizontal stabilizer by pushing forward on the stick. The zero lift line drawn along the fuselage should be redrawn closer to the wing.
Correct - Decalage changes every time you change the trim.

In fact it changes every time you move the elevator control.
Old Dec 09, 2012, 08:42 PM
AMBeck is offline
Find More Posts by AMBeck
Registered User
AMBeck's Avatar
I've been reading your articles for years!
Old Dec 09, 2012, 09:43 PM
cityevader is online now
Find More Posts by cityevader
IT'S NOSE HEAVY!!!!!!!
cityevader's Avatar
ooo...I was unaware I had any articles to be read

Seriously, thank you all for being kind with answers. For you guys, it's like someone asking a mechanic "how do I change my oil?" and i've seen lots of threads dive-bomb regarding replies, but you folks have stepped up, given many many different perspectives, and in the end, my oil got changed, thank you!
Old Dec 09, 2012, 09:55 PM
Curtis Suter is offline
Find More Posts by Curtis Suter
Red Merle ALES
Curtis Suter's Avatar
I am glad to hear of your success and your friends.

I wonder how many gliders have been retired due to improper setup/tuning.

Happy Holidays
Curtis


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Trim, cg, and incidence biskit High Performance 10 Dec 16, 2012 08:32 AM
decalage CG relations Beginner!? Modeling Science 4 Apr 26, 2005 08:04 AM
Debugging glider - which to tackle first: CG, incidence, decalage, elevator flex? dimple Hand Launch 6 Oct 28, 2004 12:09 PM
Tiny trim & CG questions JamesD Parkflyers 0 Oct 20, 2002 05:33 PM