|
||
|
Quote:
Lou |
|
|
Last edited by lperagallo; Dec 03, 2012 at 02:24 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today i switched on my DC-16 and the snow is falling in the display! Realy, no joke
|
|
|
|
|
|
send from my dc-16 via tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
uwe,steve!! You guy's are Funny/Komish!! Paul
|
|
|
|
|
|
Does Jeti have any history with transmitters? The DC-16 is something that I am definitely interested in, but I'm not an early adopter. Those of you that are buying now, are you basing your decision on the quality of other Jeti products? If not, what gives you the warm and fuzzy about buying the first transmitter that Jeti has ever made?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeti has significant history in Europe with 2.4 conversions (TX modules and receivers).
I had an opportunity to spend a fair amount of time evaluating the DC-16 transmitter software as I was transitioning from the Profi 4000 to a contemporary 2.4 system. In many respects the DC-16 is a modern version of the 4000: true open programming, the ability to name every servo input, any RX port can be used for any servo function, elegantly simple and powerful programming with next to nothing pre-determined by a guy you never met, the ability to adjust mixes in flight and state of the art features like Hall effect modules replacing traditional TX pots. I bought the Futaba 18-MZ and really tried to like it, same with the Graupner MC-32. Neither comes close to the DC-16. If programming is not an issue or if you are comfortable going along with lots of pre-programmed mixes, etc., just about any radio will do the job. But if you enjoy the benefits of true open programming and the other features the DC-16 offers, it's a tough act to follwo. My 2 cents, Steve |
|
|
|
||
|
Quote:
Thanks for getting Jeti available on this continent. PAT |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|||
|
Hallo,
nice video; showing the quality again
regards Test |
||
|
|||
|
||
Thread OP
|
Quote:
Zb/Esprit Model |
|