Walkera QR Space Walker Octocopter Review!! - Page 4 - RC Groups
Thread Tools
Jun 15, 2012, 02:44 AM
Live to learn. . .
Rafa's CB100's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafa's CB100
Confirmed. Inner motors are CW, outers are CCW.

I've sent an email to Walkera to ask for a manual or explanation. I'll let everyone know if I learn something.

Rafa
I heard back from Lily at Walkera. She says that they are working on the instruction set to convert from 8 to 4 rotors. If I see an instruction set, I will post it, obviously.

Seems like it will be as easy as removing the long arms, changing two of the rotors, and changing where everything gets plugged in at the rx.

Rafa
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jun 15, 2012, 02:48 AM
Live to learn. . .
Rafa's CB100's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jameschen072
With what I am spending on the ladybird, I cannot imagine what the maintenance bill would be like on this one. Definitely has the wow factor though!
What have you had to spend $ on with the Ladybird? The only parts I've had to replace so far have been some bent props. Other than that, I've CA'ed the motor holders back onto the booms after a crash. The motors are starting to get noisy, but still work well. I'd say I'm up to 80 flights or so on the LB. (knock on wood!)

BTW, I enjoyed reading your Super FP review from last month. Good work!

Rafa
Jun 15, 2012, 03:40 AM
Hobbyone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudsak
Any idea when parts will be available?

The Space Walker parts will be available next Monday or Tuesday from Hobbyone.
Jun 15, 2012, 04:30 AM
The flightless bird
jameschen072's Avatar
Thanks Rafa, I've replaced every part other than the rx board... It might be because I fly outside almost daily and over almost nothing but concrete (hundreds of flights at least). I've found that the motors go at different rates, the new ones are better...the original ones wear out quite rapidly and get stuck during crashes quite easily.
That said, it is one of the best things I've flown in my 10 years of experience so far. So I wouldn't be surprised if the Space Walker is too! Good job on the review
Jun 15, 2012, 04:38 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafa's CB100
I heard back from Lily at Walkera. She says that they are working on the instruction set to convert from 8 to 4 rotors. If I see an instruction set, I will post it, obviously.

Seems like it will be as easy as removing the long arms, changing two of the rotors, and changing where everything gets plugged in at the rx.

Rafa
Yep - that sounds about right. After all these are brushed motors and therefore easy to change their rotation direction by reversing the voltage applied.
Jun 15, 2012, 05:27 AM
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudsak
This graphic on Walkera's website implies that it can run with just 4 arms:

http://www.walkera.com/en1/particula...QR_SPACEWALKER

if so, it is LB's brother.
Jun 15, 2012, 05:31 AM
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ariete
Could it carry the walkera camera? It weights ~7grams. I think better than the LB.


wonderful idea. If with camera, I wanna one.
Jun 15, 2012, 12:24 PM
Registered User
m.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&hl=en&client=mv-google&v=NNpAEv4WdgQ

Just found this. Next question is will be able to update the "Ladybird" so we can buy new frame, extra motors and 4 long booms to turn the "ladybird" into a "space walker". Or extra motors and 3 short booms and motor mounts and turn it into a "Scorpion"? Here's to hoping!
Jun 15, 2012, 12:28 PM
Registered User
Oops try this.

9imod.com-Walkera QR spacewalker to QR ladybird (4 Axis) 8 Axis to 4 Axis (6 min 10 sec)
Jun 15, 2012, 12:41 PM
bobepine's Avatar
Question is, why changing a skywalker into a Ladybug? Why not just but a ladybug, instead????

Chris
Jun 15, 2012, 01:23 PM
Registered User
Rafa was mentioning how he thought the Ladybird was quicker at flip/roll recovery. And if you can add motors to a ladybird it might be enough extra thrust people are looking for to lift their cams and such.

Plus!! Half the fun for me when I got my first 3ch helis (the "Litehawk XL") and then the syma s107) was modding the sh*t out of to see what speed/thrust I could get out of 'em.

"STOCK is fun 'til something breaks.... Then you make it better"
Jun 15, 2012, 01:27 PM
bobepine's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanh
Rafa was mentioning how he thought the Ladybird was quicker at flip/roll recovery. And if you can add motors to a ladybird it might be enough extra thrust people are looking for to lift their cams and such.

Plus!! Half the fun for me when I got my first 3ch helis (the "Litehawk XL") and then the syma s107) was modding the sh*t out of to see what speed/thrust I could get out of 'em.

"STOCK is fun 'til something breaks.... Then you make it better"
Sure, I get this. But turning a skywalker into a ladybird isn't making it better. It's just making a skywakker, which costs more, into a ladybug, which costs less. I don't get it. Buy a ladybug for less money, instead and be done with it. No?

Chris
Jun 15, 2012, 01:29 PM
Live to learn. . .
Rafa's CB100's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanh
One thing I notice is that my rx has 1.0 printed on it. The one in the video has 2.0 printed on it. I wonder what else changed?

Rafa
Jun 15, 2012, 01:39 PM
Live to learn. . .
Rafa's CB100's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanh
Rafa was mentioning how he thought the Ladybird was quicker at flip/roll recovery. And if you can add motors to a ladybird it might be enough extra thrust people are looking for to lift their cams and such.

Plus!! Half the fun for me when I got my first 3ch helis (the "Litehawk XL") and then the syma s107) was modding the sh*t out of to see what speed/thrust I could get out of 'em.

"STOCK is fun 'til something breaks.... Then you make it better"
I think that the reason the LB recovers quicker is merely because it doesn't have weight hanging so far from the center of gravity to deal with.

I plan to play with pot setting in relation to roll recovery tomorrow. Maybe that would be a good test.

I'm curious to see what people come up with. I'm hoping that Bobepine will set up an octo with short, equal length booms, given that he's got a bunch of tubing. How long/short could one make the booms before it just gets ridiculous and unflyable? Would it be more stable as a micro a/v ship with longer arms?

Rafa
Jun 15, 2012, 02:17 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sudsak
Yes. And the props would be different as well.
Yup - forgot about that but I'm sure I would've figured it out after I crashed


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mini-Review Walkera QR Ladybird Review - Pictures, Video, Flight Times, and Thrust Tom Z Mini Multirotor Drones 985 Dec 26, 2016 05:43 PM
Discussion Walkera Space Walker Sudsak Micro Helis 20 Jun 14, 2012 05:22 AM
Discussion Walkera Space Walker Mini Octocopter ARCHER7153 Multirotor Drone Talk 18 Jun 14, 2012 04:19 AM
Found Sig 1/3 scale Space Walker KIT NIB.. rjstrickjr Aircraft - Fuel - Airplanes (FS/W) 2 Feb 06, 2012 12:09 PM
For Sale Seagull models .46 space walker II airframe MOUNTAINROAD Aircraft - Fuel - Airplanes (FS/W) 0 Nov 07, 2011 02:38 PM