Originally Posted by InfinitR
Love to see some stills from the 16mm Sony and the 19mm Sigma.
Here's a jpg straight out of the camera, reduced to 1600pixel ( ©2012 TAP993 ) but centre & top left corner are crops from full size image at 100%. 250th sec at F6.3 400iso Foliage and grass is a difficult test for cameras. There's tons of in camera sharpening going on. If you look at the RAW file (I always shoot RAW but did RAW+JPG) the edges are rubbish. I've shot some at 500th F6.3 100iso which are no sharper. Look at the tree in top left pic, all the leaves are mushed and oversharpened to hide the lack of definition. Basically, 16mm is OK if you put the main subject in the centre.