Ultracote vs Monokote - RC Groups
Thread Tools
Apr 12, 2012, 02:53 PM
Registered User

Ultracote vs Monokote

Title is self explanatory. Please give your opinion.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Apr 12, 2012, 04:03 PM
Airliner Builder
WAGliderGuy's Avatar
Ultracote - much easier to shrink and goes around curves with no problem. I especially like their Parklite.
Apr 12, 2012, 04:11 PM
Redacted per NSA "suggestion"
dedStik's Avatar
I've only experience with monokote but it is a bear to work around curves. Also I suck at cutting a straight line even with a straight edge.
Apr 12, 2012, 05:19 PM
Art Schmitz
+1 for Ultracote...ease of application.
Apr 12, 2012, 06:15 PM
For me Ultracote is easier to work with. But it costs more and is only 24 inches wide, while Monocote is 26 inches wide. Depending on the size of your model, that extra 2 inches of width can make a difference.
Apr 12, 2012, 06:31 PM
Registered User
Ultracote is not as strong as Monocote and is much more likely to flutter. Your choice: ease of construfction or ease of destruction.
Apr 12, 2012, 07:23 PM
Registered User
Ultra - shrinks like crazy, but won't stretch.
Mono - doesn't shrink as much, but will stretch.

Ultra - glue is mediocre, hard to keep it stuck down
Mono - better glue, narrow trim bits stay down better

Ultra - often goes slack/ripply in the hot sun
Mono - tends to stay shrunk better long term

Ultra - keep heatguns away from seams or they'll pull loose
Mono - you can burn through it with a heat gun before the seams pull

Ultra - easier for a novice to produce a presentable result.
Mono - harder for novices to work with.

That being said, today's Monokote isn't nearly as good as it was 30 years ago. I had some planes I built in high school back in the 70's stored in hot attics and the Monokote on them was tight and still stuck when I took them down decades later. I rather doubt today's product would withstand that kind of test.

You can get a decent result with either product. Each has multiple shortcomings and multiple strengths.
Apr 13, 2012, 09:14 AM
AndyKunz's Avatar
Which Monokote, old or new formula?
Apr 13, 2012, 09:42 AM
Registered User
I just started covering a newly-built, vintage Sterling Lancer SL-62. It has some funny curves that Monokote didn't like. Ultracote went smoothly without a single wrinkle.

I'm slowly but surely moving to Ultracote/Oracover.
Apr 13, 2012, 02:01 PM
Registered User
They are both good coverings and both have their positives and negatives. I prefer Monokote but it does requires a bit more skill to apply. I only say this because Ultracote and be put on the frame wrinkles and all, and shrunk tight. Monokote has to be put on wrinkle free before you even think about shrinking it. I have been using Monokote since the 80's and have not noticed this big change in formula everyone is talking about. I have only covered 2 planes with Ultracote and decided I like Mono better. Hobbico/great planes/top flite/Monokote could do a better job of showing people how to use their product. They do sell a DVD that is ok, but I think they would be better off videoing a ARF worker using their product. As much as I love Mono, it is a pain to apply Mono over Mono without punching holes on the base coat. I look at ARFs covered with Mono and there are no bubbles or holes punched in the base covering. I wonder how the heck they do that? I am covering a Peter Rake Fokker DVII with Mono right now and covered the nose block with one piece of Mono, this is how good the stuff stretches.
Apr 13, 2012, 02:36 PM
Registered User
+ 1 Ultracote. Why fight the wrinkles of Monokote?
Apr 13, 2012, 04:07 PM
Registered User
What wrinkles?
Apr 14, 2012, 12:45 PM
Dieselized User
gkamysz's Avatar
I find that Monokote varies by color. Some are easier to work with than others.

You just have to practice with either one to get a feel for it, then you can do a lot with either one.

Apr 15, 2012, 07:12 PM
I'm a pilot, 100 yrs too late
Thermalin's Avatar
Ultracote for me.. I have not had any of the issues described above. Mono is probably stronger though I cannot tell a difference b/c it's so thicker, heavier which I beleive causes the shrinkage issues and hence harder to apply on compound curves and in general. I gladly pay the extra two bucks at the LHS for ultracote.
Apr 16, 2012, 10:05 PM
Registered User
Oberst's Avatar
I like Ultra the best. It seems that Mono changed from what it used to be in my opinion. It doesn't like to shrink as well.

Solartex is my favorite for scale model covering if I don't plan on using cloth and dope. It's a bit pricey, but nice to work with.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Ultracote adhesive MOUNTAINROAD The Builders Workshop 12 Mar 07, 2012 11:32 PM
Wanted Hangar 9 Ultracote, Corsair Blue HANU905 brianfp_400 Aircraft - General - Miscellaneous (FS/W) 0 Feb 25, 2012 02:50 PM
Question Monokote vs ultracote? Advices please Turqui Painting and Finishing Tips 2 Nov 22, 2011 10:59 AM
For Sale FS - Great Planes F15 Eagle - never flown! Great Monokot scheme! electricFlyNut Aircraft - Fuel - Airplanes (FS/W) 5 Oct 19, 2010 12:21 AM
Alternatives to tape and ultracot DocMac Foamies (Kits) 0 May 25, 2001 08:45 PM