Shop our Airplanes Products Drone Products Sales
Thread Tools
Old Oct 30, 2012, 05:46 PM
H2SO4 is online now
Find More Posts by H2SO4
christian theme park operator
H2SO4's Avatar
As has been already stated, protocols cannot be patented - only their specific implementations. This has been tested in courts ad nauseum by the computer industry, and it's vanishingly unlikely to change because of RC players and their comparatively miniscule revenue.

Linux can talk SMB (samba). Microsoft had its own IPX/SPX stack back when that protocol suite still mattered. BSD had its own AppleTalk implementation called Netatalk. HH could litigate till they're blue in the face, but they can't legally prevent third parties from developing their own implementations of the DSM2 and DSMX _protocols_, irrespective of whether the protocol specs are published or reverse engineered.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Oct 30, 2012, 06:02 PM
dvogonen is offline
Find More Posts by dvogonen
Registered User
dvogonen's Avatar
Regardless of if it is possible to patent systems that contain interfaces :
Does anybody know if Horizon has tried to sue Orange earlier for making DSM receivers? Or if Futaba has sued FrSky for making compatible FAAST receivers?
Old Oct 30, 2012, 09:36 PM
molond is offline
Find More Posts by molond
Registered User
molond's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4 View Post
As has been already stated, protocols cannot be patented - only their specific implementations. This has been tested in courts ad nauseum by the computer industry, and it's vanishingly unlikely to change because of RC players and their comparatively miniscule revenue.

Linux can talk SMB (samba). Microsoft had its own IPX/SPX stack back when that protocol suite still mattered. BSD had its own AppleTalk implementation called Netatalk. HH could litigate till they're blue in the face, but they can't legally prevent third parties from developing their own implementations of the DSM2 and DSMX _protocols_, irrespective of whether the protocol specs are published or reverse engineered.
Someone knows what they are talking about! I though we had ended this argument 15 pages ago with the exact same conclusion?

For anyone who needs an example take <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReactOS">ReactOS</a>, a 100% white-room reverse engineered, feature complete "copy" of Windows XP. Since the developers can and has proven many times that the software was copied but merely a function (read protocol) was implemented, Microsoft cannot do anything to shut the program down.

Now if anyone still wants to argue can you please find examples where a protocol/function has been implemented, and thus gone to court, and the original designer has won. There are 4 case points already against the arguement.

Darcy
Old Oct 30, 2012, 09:40 PM
shahram72 is offline
Find More Posts by shahram72
Registered User
ReactOS. wow! Should go nice with OpenOffice. Amazing what I learn about here.
Old Oct 30, 2012, 09:40 PM
SleepySean is offline
Find More Posts by SleepySean
PEMAC
SleepySean's Avatar
But the question I have is:
Orange are not making copy Spektrum recievers, branded as spektrum, they are making their own receivers that are compatible with DSM protocol.

Isn't it similar to me buying a genuine toyota part for my car, or a 3rd party compatible part from repco? They seem to be legal.
Old Oct 31, 2012, 03:07 AM
DeathWarmedUp is online now
Find More Posts by DeathWarmedUp
Plane Fanatic
DeathWarmedUp's Avatar
Back on topic:

New tweet on the 29th but I didnt notice it - dont think anyone else has posted it

The HobbyKing Guys ‏@HobbyKingLive

@Kuryaky1 I'm working on the QuickStart guide and as soon as its printed and all packed with CE cert they can go on sale.
https://twitter.com/HobbyKingLive
Old Oct 31, 2012, 03:08 AM
DeathWarmedUp is online now
Find More Posts by DeathWarmedUp
Plane Fanatic
DeathWarmedUp's Avatar
Also this tweet:

The HobbyKing Guys ‏@HobbyKingLive

Many new products coming in November! Use our mobile site to stay up to date on ur phone. Unless you have an old phone, in which case 2bad
Old Oct 31, 2012, 08:22 PM
harrisonc is offline
Find More Posts by harrisonc
Registered User

Literaly hot of the press! 9XR next month


Just wanted to show my face in this thread, HK just tweeted 1 minuted ago

"I have a 9XR test unit on my desk. Releases should start this month. - Anthony."

Finally we hear some news, already got my finger on the button to order!
Old Nov 01, 2012, 12:26 AM
caseih is offline
Find More Posts by caseih
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by SleepySean View Post
But the question I have is:
Orange are not making copy Spektrum recievers, branded as spektrum, they are making their own receivers that are compatible with DSM protocol.

Isn't it similar to me buying a genuine toyota part for my car, or a 3rd party compatible part from repco? They seem to be legal.
But early editions of the orange receiver had circuit boards that were identical to Spektrum's. Which led to an interesting question. Did they also just copy the firmware (which would be illegal) and put it on their boards? Or did they develop their own DSM2 compatible firmware?

The chipset that Spektrum uses isn't their own; if I recall correctly, it is made by Texas Instruments. The only thing they really have copyrights on is their firmware, and maybe the board layout. If someone wants to use the same TI chips and reverse engineer the over-the-air protocol, and implement it in their own software, all power to them.
Old Nov 01, 2012, 01:51 AM
twincobra is offline
Find More Posts by twincobra
Registered User
twincobra's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by caseih View Post
But early editions of the orange receiver had circuit boards that were identical to Spektrum's. Which led to an interesting question. Did they also just copy the firmware (which would be illegal) and put it on their boards? Or did they develop their own DSM2 compatible firmware?

The chipset that Spektrum uses isn't their own; if I recall correctly, it is made by Texas Instruments. The only thing they really have copyrights on is their firmware, and maybe the board layout. If someone wants to use the same TI chips and reverse engineer the over-the-air protocol, and implement it in their own software, all power to them.
Cypress 2.4ghz chipset - same one that the orange RX's use.
Old Nov 01, 2012, 08:01 AM
Julez is offline
Find More Posts by Julez
Proud to eat Kraut ;-)
Julez's Avatar
Now that they obviously have access to the DSMX protocol, why don't they make the T9XR DSMX compatible like the new Orange Spektrum module, so that they can enter the market with an up-to-date RF system?

Or am I missing something?
Old Nov 01, 2012, 08:10 AM
molond is offline
Find More Posts by molond
Registered User
molond's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julez View Post
Now that they obviously have access to the DSMX protocol, why don't they make the T9XR DSMX compatible like the new Orange Spektrum module, so that they can enter the market with an up-to-date RF system?

Or am I missing something?
Yes, DSM2/DSMX is a feature on the 9XR.
Old Nov 01, 2012, 09:01 AM
aeajr is offline
Find More Posts by aeajr
Proud member of LISF and ESL
looking interesting. Especially since Spektrum has said time and time again that they can't make a DSM2/DSMX module. Seems Orange has done something with the Spektrum Protocols that Spektrum can't do.

RCmodelreviews.com, I hope you are going to take a look at this.
Old Nov 01, 2012, 09:16 AM
molond is offline
Find More Posts by molond
Registered User
molond's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by aeajr View Post
looking interesting. Especially since Spektrum has said time and time again that they can't make a DSM2/DSMX module. Seems Orange has done something with the Spektrum Protocols that Spektrum can't do.

RCmodelreviews.com, I hope you are going to take a look at this.
Spectrum only say that because they want to make money off of JR's and their own upper class TXs. Now that OrangeRX has released the module and the 9XR will have a similar module they will probably rethink their stance so they can still make some money off of DSM2/DSMX.

Darcy
Old Nov 01, 2012, 10:34 AM
dave1993 is offline
Find More Posts by dave1993
RC beginner
if the dsmx module was similar price to flysky module i would buy one. but it costs a lot more. maybe it will come down in time. i wonder who these "orange" guys are anyway? dont seem to be hk.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Gens Ace, Turnigy, Turnigy Nano-Tech Sky lipo, etc. What's Your Preference? jlloyd1995 Batteries and Chargers 133 May 14, 2015 11:53 PM
Sold 2 turnigy motors 2 turnigy esc's crashnburn69 Aircraft - Electric - Power Systems (FS/W) 4 Oct 13, 2012 12:05 PM
For Sale Turnigy 2x 3s 1000 mah and 2s 1000 mah and Turnigy 2s/3s Lipo charger. Falconpunch Aircraft - Electric - Batteries & Chargers (FS/W) 1 Mar 18, 2012 10:47 PM
Discussion Turnigy or Turnigy Nanotech lawguy14 Batteries and Chargers 4 Mar 15, 2012 09:48 AM