Thread Tools
Apr 02, 2012, 11:27 AM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
Discussion

Interesting time line of the rights attcks on Trayvon


Here is a good article detailing the rights attacks on Treyvon Martin. The timing is interesting. As is the fact that some on the right were making some very reasonable comments initially. Clearly that has proven to be an exception.

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/why_...tin/singleton/
Last edited by Sherlock; Apr 02, 2012 at 12:54 PM.
Apr 02, 2012, 11:32 AM
Registered User
ENGINETORQUE's Avatar
The whole think stinks - if this is 'justice' in modern day America then it's very sad!
Apr 02, 2012, 11:33 AM
Registered User
UlteriorModem's Avatar
Its amusing that this hit piece (love the red photos btw) comes out on the day that NBC gets popped for doctering audio tapes to make it appear that Zimmerman was only concerned about race.

Wheres the timeline on the lefts attack on Zimmerman, surely there is tons of material there.

Oh and the article appears to be 'one persons opinion' as well.

Also I havent really heard any unreasonable 'attacks' from the pundits mentioned. In fact most of them that I have personally heard have been calling for calm and revelation of the 'truth' nor has any of them issued a bounty.
Apr 02, 2012, 11:37 AM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by UlteriorModem
Its amusing that this hit piece (love the red photos btw) comes out on the day that NBC gets popped for doctering audio tapes to make it appear that Zimmerman was only concerned about race.

Wheres the timeline on the lefts attack on Zimmerman, surely there is tons of material there.

Oh and the article appears to be 'one persons opinion' as well.

Also I havent really heard any unreasonable 'attacks' from the pundits mentioned. In fact most of them that I have personally heard have been calling for calm and revelation of the 'truth' nor has any of them issued a bounty.
Given the title of the article I am wondering why you are having trouble understanding why there is nothing about NBC.

If you take a moment and actually read the article and the links within you will have zero trouble finding unreasonable attacks. Nothing in your post discredits anything in the article.
Apr 02, 2012, 11:56 AM
Registered User
For a guy who rarely if ever can produce testible falsifications of ideas he claims are wrong to be making these assertions lends new meaning to the word irony.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:20 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnGoat
For a guy who rarely if ever can produce testible falsifications of ideas he claims are wrong to be making these assertions lends new meaning to the word irony.

Anybody got the Universal translator for use on this?????????????
Apr 02, 2012, 12:26 PM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by me11owman
Anybody got the Universal translator for use on this?????????????
Sherlock rarely can back up what he claims, therefore, his complaint against "unreasonable attacks" is ironic, that is, gives full expression to contradictory impulses.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:27 PM
It's 5 O'clock Somewhere
RumRunner_1492's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherlock
Here is a good article detailing the rights attacks on Treyvon Martin. The timing is interesting. As is the fact that some on the right were making some very reasonable comments initially. Clearly that has proven to be an exception.

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/02/why_...rayvon_martin/
It makes a clear case for who doesn't really care about the story and only wants to push a race agenda and who wants to let the process work and not convict anyone in public until all of the facts are out.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:27 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsci_guy
Sherlock rarely can back up what he claims, therefore, his complaint against "unreasonable attacks" is ironic, that is, gives full expression to contradictory impulses.
I didn't think it was a complex statement.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:30 PM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnGoat
I didn't think it was a complex statement.
You get that complaint a lot, so it must be true. Try simplistic character attacks next time.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:39 PM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnGoat
For a guy who rarely if ever can produce testible falsifications of ideas he claims are wrong to be making these assertions lends new meaning to the word irony.
You are expending a great amount of energy attacking the source. Your above attempt to distract and ignore the points in the article is not even valid and in no way falsifies anything therein. I can see why you would like to avoid talking about the painful truths it discusses. The Irony is that the article actually points to some positive reactions from the right as well. Not that that has changed the usual kneejerk we are seeing here.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:42 PM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsci_guy
Sherlock rarely can back up what he claims, therefore, his complaint against "unreasonable attacks" is ironic, that is, gives full expression to contradictory impulses.
False and totally irrelevant to the article. Failure to respond to the demands of people on this forum is not evidence of inability to back up claims. It is evidence of a failure to play games and or follow a distraction.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:44 PM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherlock
False and totally irrelevant to the article. Failure to respond to the demands of people on this forum is not evidence of inability to back up claims. It is evidence of a failure to play games and or follow a distraction.
Based on my experience, I believe that it's true that you consistently fail to back up your assertions. That you now say that the practice is deliberate, is no surprise.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:45 PM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by RumRunner_1492
It makes a clear case for who doesn't really care about the story and only wants to push a race agenda and who wants to let the process work and not convict anyone in public until all of the facts are out.
I thought that was pretty clear from the article as well. The outright fabrications and character assanations a by the right do not aid the process at all.
Apr 02, 2012, 12:46 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sherlock
False and totally irrelevant to the article. Failure to respond to the demands of people on this forum is not evidence of inability to back up claims. It is evidence of a failure to play games and or follow a distraction.
It's not only the intentional failure to respond when you are cornered. It is also the kind of intentional evasiveness displayed when engaging in the abuse of language, such as a many, many page evasion of the meaning of mathematics when it comes to tax rates.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Victory Ship of the Line on the Line AllanTravers Scale Sailboats 1 Dec 11, 2011 06:05 AM
Discussion Any one have interest and time on part time job for battery selling? monkistuta France 0 Mar 03, 2010 09:19 PM
Discussion Top right knob on E-sky 0406A? what for does it = less flight time? turnbui Micro Helis 0 May 03, 2008 01:27 PM
Question battery placement: Need it be right on the planes thrust line?? hifi heretic Electric Plane Talk 10 Dec 12, 2004 11:26 PM
What do you snack on while wasting time on-line? radix2 Life, The Universe, and Politics 14 Jan 25, 2002 08:59 PM