New Products Flash Sale
Thread Tools
Dec 22, 2012, 09:42 PM
Xtreme Power Systems
No, you are mistaken. They really are -150dBm to -165dBm (and more now!) sensitivity. Here are just a few examples from dozens of GPS receiver chips available:

http://gpstekreviews.com/2007/04/14/...rmance-survey/
http://microcontrollershop.com/produ...oducts_id=4597
http://www.u-blox.com/en/gps-chips/s...ngle-chip.html

Spread spectrum signals are 'wide' band transmissions, but the definition of 'wide' is subject to opinion. As pointed out in the datasheet for the AT86RF212 the bandwidth is selectable from 240KHz to 1.2MHz. Wider is better for fighting interference.

Spread spectrum systems do not add noise. They do in fact reduce the effects of noise. Here is an article describing how spread spectrum works, including noise suppression and processing gain:

http://www.eetimes.com/design/commun...rum-Technology

I spent 18 months of my life helping debug and test a 2.4GHz front-end chip, and building more than 50 different prototype designs for testing. I think I have a pretty good handle on how all of this stuff works. The information I have presented is absolutely correct, verified by Atmel (and other 900MHz RF chipset manufacturers) with real world testing, providing application notes to the public for projects that you can build yourself and test.
Last edited by JimDrew; Dec 22, 2012 at 09:50 PM.
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Dec 23, 2012, 12:35 AM
Registered User
I think your specification is mistaken
check this out.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Sensitivity_GPS
Dec 23, 2012, 01:05 PM
Xtreme Power Systems
LOL! "This article does not cite any references or sources." Not surprising it is incorrect. That 'W' should be a 'M' instead. Seriously, do some research on the chipset manufacturers and see what they show for sensitivity. I already linked several examples, but you can find dozens of others.
Apr 16, 2013, 11:46 AM
Thermals, Tom
RyanNX211's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimDrew View Post
We plan to make 900MHz as common as our 2.4Ghz, with indentical modules and receivers.
While my interest in 900mhz was piqued a while ago, I have no problem with 2,4 Nanos at this point.

It was good to hear at Toledo that you're holding off on this as we don't want to draw unnecessary attention for our ability to fly our models really far away.
Otherwise, I might commit to waiting and not making a decision.
Apr 16, 2013, 03:53 PM
Registered User
jim don't know how you are so diplomatic with that guy just reading his post are annoying

don


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sold Gently used 900 mhz patch and 1/2 wave 900 mhz tx antenna Kahuna717 FPV Equipment (FS/W) 2 Oct 02, 2011 05:50 AM
Help! RV 900 mHz TX/RX, DX-201. PROBLEMS bsfixit FPV Talk 3 Sep 12, 2011 03:13 PM
Found 900 mhz Receiver thefokker FPV Equipment (FS/W) 3 Sep 08, 2011 03:53 PM
For Sale Gently used 900 mhz patch and 1/2 wave 900 mhz tx antenna Kahuna717 FPV Equipment (FS/W) 1 Aug 02, 2011 09:53 PM
For Sale Gently used 900 mhz patch and 1/2 wave 900 mhz tx antenna Kahuna717 FPV Equipment (FS/W) 4 Jul 03, 2011 12:20 AM