What AS3X aircraft would you like to see developed? - Page 6 - RC Groups
Shop our Airplanes Products Drone Products Sales
Thread Tools
Oct 24, 2011, 01:40 PM
I'd rather be flying!
turboparker's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by maukabud
Here's one that's close to my heart...because at one time I worked for a division of Lancair (Columbia) and was planning on building one for myself...full scale.

Lancair 360/Legacy 2000. It's a hot ship! Sexy and gorgeous IMO.
Bud,

Love the 360! Essentially - sex with wings attached. Never have had the chance to fly one (or even ride in one). But a guy can always dream...

Joel
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Oct 24, 2011, 01:51 PM
Registered User
RNAF's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pouncer
Idly musing, I'd like to see a a 14 or 16" Fokker Dr I, in factory livery, without dihedral and a perilously aftwards CG.

Or a UM Harrier that can hover but there are serious engineering challenges involved; while the body of the Harrier is (was) very wide you could probably fid a shrouded 5070 prop in there and still call it a micro.
But how do you control it while in hover? If you fit 2 counter rotating motors inside you could control the roll axis with torque but what about pitch and yaw?
The real Harrier bleeds compressed air from the turbine and controls its attitude via nozzles in tail and wing tips but I don't see that happening on a small model.

What I really want is an ultra micro version of the E-Flite electrical retracts..
I think a lightweight Harrier could be done without those nozzles in tail and wing.
Bit too much engineering involved but what the heck
50mm EDF -> 34cm span, 56cm span (approx).

Here's a system that a German guy designed:
One EDF, four thrusters controlled by 2 servos. Left/ right each has 1.

"Action" starts from 2:30.

Harrier - RC-Impeller Antrieb (4 min 5 sec)
Oct 24, 2011, 01:59 PM
Way to many airplanes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by turboparker
Bud,

Love the 360! Essentially - sex with wings attached. Never have had the chance to fly one (or even ride in one). But a guy can always dream...

Joel
Hey, hey, if you ever come up north, I'll let you fly my good old Electrifly Lancair! The only fiberglass/balsa airplane in my fleet (and basically the reason why it's still in top shape today, except the cowl). Have not flown it in the last two years, since I broke the propeller (little ooops moment) and never replaced it. Now, I'm getting the itch to go shopping for one before winter!
Oct 24, 2011, 02:23 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by RealGambler
Hey, hey, if you ever come up north, I'll let you fly my good old Electrifly Lancair! The only fiberglass/balsa airplane in my fleet (and basically the reason why it's still in top shape today, except the cowl). Have not flown it in the last two years, since I broke the propeller (little ooops moment) and never replaced it. Now, I'm getting the itch to go shopping for one before winter!
Considering what I thought he might offer, that was a tame post.

I'd love to see more WWII birds, LIKE A UM STUKA! I might save a few bucks for a brick to go into the Guillow's 16.5" conversion I've currently got pinned to the board...
Oct 24, 2011, 02:28 PM
Wanton construction
Pouncer's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNAF
I think a lightweight Harrier could be done without those nozzles in tail and wing.
Bit too much engineering involved but what the heck
50mm EDF -> 34cm span, 56cm span (approx).

Here's a system that a German guy designed:
One EDF, four thrusters controlled by 2 servos. Left/ right each has 1.

"Action" starts from 2:30.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PWtvbqbIUg
I've given it a bit more thought and I suppose it could theoretically be possible with existing components, basically by tilting a mCX 90 degrees forward.
Divide exhaust into four equal parts each leading to one of four nozzles, cyclic control then distributes thrust as needed.
Counter rotating shrouded props provide roll authority by torque.
The above gives control in forwar/backward and side to side translation, and roll.
We lack yaw so we need to 2 servos to operate the port and starboard nozzles in opposition.

The mCX doesn't have much spare power so even a proof of concept mock-up would be iffy, additionally it's 4 channels so no transition from hover to FF, and it lacks a couple of gyros..

But in theory..
Oct 24, 2011, 03:44 PM
Team CJ Youngblood
anthony7820's Avatar
i would like them try and make this
Oct 24, 2011, 04:00 PM
Registered User
RNAF's Avatar
Pouncer, you do have yaw.
See left and right thrusters as tracks of a tank Left two forward, right two rearward = left yaw.
Pitch is done by a valve controlling airflow to rear and front thrusters.

Maybe a little off topic (this post) but the last ten years have proven that dreams come true
Oct 24, 2011, 04:00 PM
I'm slow but I'm expensive
Ken Lilja's Avatar

Piaggio Avanti


As Sophia Loren is to women, the Avanti is to planes.
http://www.flightglobal.com/airspace...anti-9599.aspx
http://www.luxist.com/photos/jamesli...uries/2660419/
http://www.nextcraft.com/p180.html
Ken
Oct 24, 2011, 04:13 PM
Wanton construction
Pouncer's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNAF
Pouncer, you do have yaw.
See left and right thrusters as tracks of a tank Left two forward, right two rearward = left yaw.
Pitch is done by a valve controlling airflow to rear and front thrusters.

Maybe a little off topic (this post) but the last ten years have proven that dreams come true
Yeah that's why I figured 2 servos were needed for the thrusters.
But I thought some more and if we have this level of control over the nozzles we can ditch the cyclic pitch completely and no need for valves:

Forward/backward translation by rotating the thruster backwards and forwards respectively.
Side to side by propeller torque.
Yaw by thrusters in opposition, like you described.

Horizon, are you taking notes ?
Oct 24, 2011, 04:19 PM
Registered User
Maybe Lockheed L-133.
Oct 24, 2011, 05:05 PM
its TALON TIME!
corsair nut's Avatar
X-4!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oct 24, 2011, 05:52 PM
Registered User
I'll go primitive: Fokker DR-1. Maybe it's nothing outlandish, but it seems that most descriptions of them indicate they're pretty squirrely, and this might tame one in a UM size.
Oct 24, 2011, 06:30 PM
IAMCANADIAN
Grejen's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by dukeofdata
Arrows are flyable now. I have a 19" version (hey that's micro scale for a CF-105). It has a roll wobble issue that a gyro would probably clear easily.

I can't believe no one has yet suggested a V-173 or even better the XF5U Flying Pancake! I tried a V-173 but had problems with roll response, tucking, and matching the thrust well enough to control yaw.
Oct 24, 2011, 06:58 PM
HELP I AM BEING SET UP!!
maukabud's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grejen
Arrows are flyable now. I have a 19" version (hey that's micro scale for a CF-105). It has a roll wobble issue that a gyro would probably clear easily.

I can't believe no one has yet suggested a V-173 or even better the XF5U Flying Pancake! I tried a V-173 but had problems with roll response, tucking, and matching the thrust well enough to control yaw.
probably because it's too unmentionably ugly?
Oct 24, 2011, 07:15 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grejen
Arrows are flyable now. I have a 19" version (hey that's micro scale for a CF-105). It has a roll wobble issue that a gyro would probably clear easily.

I can't believe no one has yet suggested a V-173 or even better the XF5U Flying Pancake! I tried a V-173 but had problems with roll response, tucking, and matching the thrust well enough to control yaw.
that wold be cool
btw I think it looks fine


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Poll What jet would you most like to see in an upcoming J-Power/Skyangel mini-jet release? herk1 Foamy EDFs 26 Oct 25, 2016 03:08 PM
Discussion What locations would you like someone else to film, because you can't get there? Flying-Monkey Aerial Photography 19 Jan 13, 2016 12:48 PM
Discussion Are 70mm's Dead? IF not what would you like to see? Dark Angel Foamy EDFs 16 Oct 28, 2015 06:06 PM
Discussion what would we like to see in the next version of the msr cmulder Micro Helis 0 Jul 31, 2011 11:53 AM