Originally Posted by debianhot
I agree that the most normal from Frsky is that they would produced a "Full telemetry display" to be pluged into the existing telemetry tx modules before releasing DHT-U.
For the non rf module radios DHT-U is ok as it is , but for the ones that have modules and are not so skilled in solding it is not a "fit and forget" product. They should have done a "fake" tx module in whitch to plug the DHT-U like PLMS did on post #37 .
My (first ever to RCgroups) 5c to Frsky telemetry hub and sensor discussion theme:
A few days ago I sold Assan Combo to buy Frsky Combo (just) for telemetry reasons. And what I find out? If I want to use telemetry, I have to buy DHT-U, because I cannot use DFT module + some kind of display to get info from sensors and telemetry hub! Frsky, I do not understand you, really.
I completely agree with debianhot: PLEASE make "full" telemetry display just to be plugged into existing DFT and DJT modules or modify Lite display so it could show ALL telemetry info. And separate powersource for standalone display would probably be also great. That way radio battery does not have to support display. I'm wondering how much does DHT-U drain battery of radio (PLMS, could you give us that info?)...
That solution would be much safer, because if someone by mistake disconnects DFT-U from radio (if you use PLMS metod of attaching unit to radio), not only telemetry, controll of plane goes bye, bye
!!! Imagine that happens to someone new to RC stuff who wants to have latest in telemetry solutions?
Best regards from Slovenia,