Do you think Global Warming is caused by Mankinds burning of fossil fuels? - Page 592 - RC Groups
View Poll Results: Do you think Global Warming is caused by Mankinds burning of fossil fuels?
Yes, it is caused by fossil fuels 296 36.63%
Not sure 98 12.13%
No it is not cause by fossil fuels 414 51.24%
Voters: 808. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Jul 19, 2012, 05:00 PM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Jim, engineers do original research all the time, not just, "The second kind of science to design and construct things which work as advertised", with occasional forays into "Real Science", er... Science Number One.







I'm pretty sure that a patent search would reveal quite a large percent of engineers had submitted them.
Jul 19, 2012, 06:20 PM
Registered User
Not about climate change, but here is an example of normal or ordinary science where one is working within the framework of well tested theory. It is still original research. Something like the chief engineer at Clarence Cannon Dam telling me the hydropower plant was designed and built using 'standard engineering practice'.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0719132855.htm

It is interesting that ability to recognize recombinations in individual sperm gives resuts very similar to those of much more theoretical population based studies.
Jul 19, 2012, 06:30 PM
Cheese eating monkey.
Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy42
if it bites or scratches, it is biology. If it stinks or explodes it's chemistry. If it doesn't work, it's physics. If it works, but no one knows why, it's engineering. And if no one believes you - it is climatology...:d:d:d
:d :d
Last edited by Panoramix; Jul 19, 2012 at 06:50 PM.
Jul 19, 2012, 06:49 PM
Cheese eating monkey.
Quote:
Originally Posted by madsci_guy
Jim, engineers do original research all the time, not just, "The second kind of science to design and construct things which work as advertised", with occasional forays into "Real Science", er... Science Number One.

I'm pretty sure that a patent search would reveal quite a large percent of engineers had submitted them.
Research isn't always science, Engineering isn't necessarily about repeating stuff that has been done before but proper science is relatively uncommon, sometimes you need to work out the science into engineering principles but having to do the science is a step beyond that few have to take. I suppose may be the guys who were the first to fly beyond the speed of sound can claim they've done some science but you don't need to be a scientist to patent something, just a bit ingeniuous and patenting stuff IMHO is more of an engineer job than a scientist one.
Jul 19, 2012, 06:57 PM
Figure Nine Champ
madsci_guy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by panoramix
research isn't always science,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiki
science (from latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe.
qed
Jul 19, 2012, 09:59 PM
Registered User
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0719115130.htm

Here are some CO2 numbers for your perusal. Looks to me like we are going to run the what happens to the earth if CO2 concentrations continue to rise experiment.
Jul 20, 2012, 03:02 AM
Sloping off....
leccyflyer's Avatar
Like the man said, research isn't always science - research can include historical research, market research, genealogical research and any amount of other forms of non-scientific research.
Jul 21, 2012, 01:15 AM
Tu ne cede malis
MtnGoat's Avatar
Quote:
Christopher Monckton saute’s and dices the usual fallacies, but also calculates the cost-benefits of the Australia Carbon Tax, should it be reproduced on a global scale.

He assumes that not only will the Carbon Tax achieve what Ms Gillard intended (emissions wise), but also that the exaggerated unvalidated climate models of IPCC fame are completely correct. With these cavernous caveats, he estimates it will cost $2,000 trillion to cool the planet by one degree, and that’s the best case scenario.

“…carbon trading in Australia will cost $10.1 bn/year, plus $1.6 bn/year for administration (Wong, 2010, p. 5), plus $1.2 bn/year for renewables and other costs, a total of $13 bn/year, rising at 5%/year, or $130 bn by 2020 at n.p.v., to abate 5% of current emissions, which represent 1.2% of world emissions (derived from Boden et al., 2010ab). Thus the Australian measure, if it succeeded as fully as its promoters intend, would abate 0.06% of global emissions over its 10-year term. CO2 concentration would fall from a business-as-usual 410 to 409.988 ppmv by the end of the term. Forcing abated is 0.0002 W m–2; warming consequently abated is 0.00006 K; mitigation cost-effectiveness, which is the cost of abating 1 K global warming by measures of equivalent cost-effectiveness, is $2,000 tr/K. On the same basis, the cost of abating all projected warming over the ten-year life of the policy is $300 trillion, or $44,000/head, or 58% of global GDP over the period. The cost of mitigation by such measures would exceed the cost of climate-related damage consequent upon inaction by a factor of approximately 50.”
The economics of saving the planet don't even make sense
Jul 21, 2012, 01:16 AM
Tu ne cede malis
MtnGoat's Avatar
...
Jul 21, 2012, 06:28 AM
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtnGoat
The practicality of saving the planet does make sense.

VP
Jul 23, 2012, 07:28 PM
Registered User
http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...orthern-europe

It seems that the Baltic Sea is the fastest warming ocean type water body. The link doesn't speculate about why this is; an interesting question, to be sure. The thrust of the link is that warming of water bodies is allowing bacterial diseases to move north, to where they are unexpected and, perhaps, ill prepared for.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...feed&mobile=nc

This one is about the state of the lobster fishery. Warming is moving the molting earlier in the year. I had never heard of "rag" lobsters, although I have consumed many soft shell crabs. There are a number of other factors affecting the fishery as well, of course.
Last edited by Jim Thomerson; Jul 23, 2012 at 07:54 PM.
Jul 29, 2012, 09:34 AM
Suspended Account

It is good someone is throwing money at the problem..............


http://suite101.com/article/bill-gat...dstill-a304743

VP
Jul 29, 2012, 09:47 AM
Registered User
Sluf7's Avatar
Well at least the pestilance is striking the U.S of A more than most at present. What with the Great rivers at there lowest since records began I think they said 17metres in some places. Forest Fires and the Odd bit of flooding, Tornado's outa no where's and unprecidented electrical storms. Oh and lets not forget the over enthusiastic Heat waves now.

Say have they got the Seat of power back on yet or was it just the Pleb's in the Burbs who went without power.

Nah fossil fuels surely can't have anything to do with that....reminds me of a somg. Dream,Dream , Dream............................
Jul 29, 2012, 09:49 AM
Registered User
Sherlock's Avatar
http://m.rollingstone.com/?redirurl=...-math-20120719

We are $@*$%ed.
Jul 29, 2012, 09:50 AM
Registered User
Sluf7's Avatar






Last edited by Sluf7; Jul 29, 2012 at 09:56 PM.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion A complete list of things caused by global warming Viper Pilot Life, The Universe, and Politics 6 Jan 19, 2017 09:54 PM
Discussion Human Caused Global Warming is Offically A Religion- Earth 2100 Lightnin Life, The Universe, and Politics 29 Aug 22, 2014 12:57 AM
Discussion What do you think caused the ice ages? Bilbobaker Life, The Universe, and Politics 71 Jun 24, 2014 04:21 AM
Discussion who do you think you are? Aaron 1 Life, The Universe, and Politics 30 Feb 25, 2013 08:39 PM
Discussion Sad to be posting here. What do you think caused this? ndb8fxe Crash Discussion 8 Feb 28, 2009 10:57 PM