The US is taking military action in yet another oil producing nation. Should the US Congress restrict the ability for President Obama to escalate the US' military effort, such as preventing him to introduce ground troops outside of rescue missions for US citizens, or airmen downed enforcing the no-fly zone?

Why are you tying his hands?
The prez needs room to move!
Or does he?

So what you're saying is that you want Obama free to send ground troops into Libya?

Get out - get out now - stop doing what you're doing and go and sort the US economy out instead of meddling overseas!

That'd be my advice to BO

+1 ET.

--Bill

Originally Posted by ENGINETORQUE

Get out - get out now - stop doing what you're doing and go and sort the US economy out instead of meddling overseas!

That'd be my advice to BO

Hillary Clinton apparently disagrees with you.....In fact, in her experience, doing nothing is worse.

The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.

Originally Posted by thunder1

So what you're saying is that you want Obama free to send ground troops into Libya?

Black opps sure...It's all about the Oil the French or Brits will do it...I don't think Obama will...There has to be a end game and if we can turn his own aginst him well some one has to go cut the snakes head off..

Our congress should be restricting a lot of thing but they are not.

Originally Posted by BE77 Pilot

Our congress should be restricting a lot of thing but they are not.

I think the deal is we are geting out...But will still be playing Quarter back because of our logistical strong arm the French and Brits need.

Sure Congress will aprove fueling ,supplies, data yada yada yada,,,,but no boots.

Any hoot it's where we want to be command and control..

Originally Posted by Kenny Sharp

Hillary Clinton apparently disagrees with you.....In fact, in her experience, doing nothing is worse.

Yes well that's hillary for you

Originally Posted by Norman Adlam

The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.

Until they change things down the road a bit that is

We'll see......................

Originally Posted by Norman Adlam

The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.

UN resolution limiting military actions?

Surely you don't think a UN resolution would keep the US, or UK for that matter, from taking whatever action is deemed necessary by their respective military CiCs?

This is going to be another insurgency, destroy infrastructure and secure the wealth.

War theater number four. Wake up.

Originally Posted by thunder1

The US is taking military action in yet another oil producing nation. Should the US Congress restrict the ability for President Obama to escalate the US' military effort, such as preventing him to introduce ground troops outside of rescue missions for US citizens, or airmen downed enforcing the no-fly zone?

I think you should reword "the ability for President Obama" to the ability of the Obama government. Meaning the behind the scenes puppet masters telling him what to tell you through the corp. war machine controlled media.

He is a puppet, not capable of this decision making on his own. These things are made up well in advance. He (Obama) is mearly the messenger of death forced to do the bidding of the elite with a gun to his head and/or a billion dollar bribe.

Go ahead, elect a new puppet. It happens all over the world, all the time. If they aren't elected out, they are bombed out.