Shop our Airplanes Products Drone Products Sales
View Poll Results: Should Congress restrict military action in Lybia?
Yes 15 88.24%
No 2 11.76%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Mar 20, 2011, 08:47 PM
Registered User
Poll

Should the US Congress restrict military action in Libya?


The US is taking military action in yet another oil producing nation. Should the US Congress restrict the ability for President Obama to escalate the US' military effort, such as preventing him to introduce ground troops outside of rescue missions for US citizens, or airmen downed enforcing the no-fly zone?
Mar 20, 2011, 09:07 PM
Reduce the drama...
rick.benjamin's Avatar
Why are you tying his hands?
The prez needs room to move!
Or does he?
Mar 20, 2011, 09:12 PM
Registered User
So what you're saying is that you want Obama free to send ground troops into Libya?
Mar 21, 2011, 05:22 AM
Registered User
ENGINETORQUE's Avatar
Get out - get out now - stop doing what you're doing and go and sort the US economy out instead of meddling overseas!

That'd be my advice to BO
Mar 21, 2011, 06:44 AM
Restful User
Jacques Flambeau's Avatar
+1 ET.

--Bill
Mar 21, 2011, 06:50 AM
turn, turn, turn.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ENGINETORQUE View Post
Get out - get out now - stop doing what you're doing and go and sort the US economy out instead of meddling overseas!

That'd be my advice to BO
Hillary Clinton apparently disagrees with you.....In fact, in her experience, doing nothing is worse.
Mar 21, 2011, 07:09 AM
Official Old Git!
The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.
Mar 21, 2011, 07:16 AM
Thanks for the Fish!
aerogel's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder1 View Post
So what you're saying is that you want Obama free to send ground troops into Libya?
Black opps sure...It's all about the Oil the French or Brits will do it...I don't think Obama will...There has to be a end game and if we can turn his own aginst him well some one has to go cut the snakes head off..
Mar 21, 2011, 07:18 AM
GOOD BOY!
BE77 Pilot's Avatar
Our congress should be restricting a lot of thing but they are not.
Mar 21, 2011, 07:22 AM
Thanks for the Fish!
aerogel's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by BE77 Pilot View Post
Our congress should be restricting a lot of thing but they are not.
I think the deal is we are geting out...But will still be playing Quarter back because of our logistical strong arm the French and Brits need.

Sure Congress will aprove fueling ,supplies, data yada yada yada,,,,but no boots.

Any hoot it's where we want to be command and control..
Mar 21, 2011, 08:05 AM
Registered User
ENGINETORQUE's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenny Sharp View Post
Hillary Clinton apparently disagrees with you.....In fact, in her experience, doing nothing is worse.
Yes well that's hillary for you
Mar 21, 2011, 08:07 AM
Registered User
ENGINETORQUE's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Adlam View Post
The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.
Until they change things down the road a bit that is

We'll see......................
Mar 21, 2011, 10:03 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Adlam View Post
The UN resolution already limits his (and others) actions. There will explicitly be no 'invasion' forces.
UN resolution limiting military actions?

Surely you don't think a UN resolution would keep the US, or UK for that matter, from taking whatever action is deemed necessary by their respective military CiCs?
Mar 21, 2011, 10:12 AM
Registered User
BACKEMFNRG's Avatar
This is going to be another insurgency, destroy infrastructure and secure the wealth.

War theater number four. Wake up.
Mar 21, 2011, 10:20 AM
Registered User
BACKEMFNRG's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by thunder1 View Post
The US is taking military action in yet another oil producing nation. Should the US Congress restrict the ability for President Obama to escalate the US' military effort, such as preventing him to introduce ground troops outside of rescue missions for US citizens, or airmen downed enforcing the no-fly zone?
I think you should reword "the ability for President Obama" to the ability of the Obama government. Meaning the behind the scenes puppet masters telling him what to tell you through the corp. war machine controlled media.

He is a puppet, not capable of this decision making on his own. These things are made up well in advance. He (Obama) is mearly the messenger of death forced to do the bidding of the elite with a gun to his head and/or a billion dollar bribe.

Go ahead, elect a new puppet. It happens all over the world, all the time. If they aren't elected out, they are bombed out.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Liberal Democrats in uproar over Libya action aerogel Life, The Universe, and Politics 8 Mar 20, 2011 05:43 PM
Discussion Clinton warns against unilateral US move on Libya MtnGoat Life, The Universe, and Politics 175 Mar 20, 2011 03:17 AM
Discussion Gen. Wesley Clark: "Libya doesn't meet the test for U.S. military action" Kurpal Life, The Universe, and Politics 37 Mar 18, 2011 06:42 PM
Discussion Military Action Figures panacheplace Chit Chat 0 Oct 28, 2010 05:32 AM
Discussion US congress proposes new Internet censorship act Kurpal Life, The Universe, and Politics 9 Sep 30, 2010 08:51 PM