Current draw static Vs. in flight - RC Groups
Shop our Airplanes Products Drone Products Sales
Thread Tools
Oct 07, 2010, 11:06 AM
Registered User

Current draw static Vs. in flight

What would be the difference in current draw from static to the current draw in flight @ WOT?
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Oct 07, 2010, 11:41 AM
eye4wings's Avatar
Hard to say. Depends mostly on what pitch prop you are using and what revs it is running although there are other factors.
If you reckon in flight your actual current draw will just sneak under the limit of your ESC when it would go over the top static then I reckon you would be pushing your luck.
On the other hand if at WOT your amps are just inside the limit then you will probably be flying with enough of a margin - but provide plenty of cooling air.

Several people are posting the traces from EagleTree data loggers now. The trouble is I have not yet seen one with the current noted at WOT static and flying. I may just have missed it of course.
Oct 07, 2010, 12:56 PM
DX5e fatal flaw- PM me!!!!
I'd like to say 'gee, this is easy because when the plane is moving the air is already going past the prop so static must be larger' but these things can be counter-intuitive.

Oct 07, 2010, 01:50 PM
Xpress..'s Avatar
The general consensus is that current draw in flight will be slightly lower.
Oct 07, 2010, 02:37 PM
Registered User
I guess it also depends on the airframe drag. Im going to do a flight with my watt meter plugged in at the weekend and see what it says. Ill launch at 1/2 throttle, do one level WOT pass then land.
Oct 07, 2010, 06:09 PM
eye4wings's Avatar
So your watt meter has memory and can show you the numbers after you land? Wish my Astro did that!
Oct 07, 2010, 06:14 PM
Wake up, feel pulse, be happy!
Piece's Avatar
I guess it also depends on the airframe drag
Airframe drag is one of the biggest factors. A plane with a lot of drag (Slow Stick) will fly much slower than the prop wants to (the pitchspeed), whereas a plane with very little drag (Sokol) will fly very close (within a few %) to the pitchspeed of the prop because there's very little to slow the plane down. Think of dropping a rock and a feather. The closer you get to pitchspeed, the more efficient your motor/prop becomes because they have to shove less air out of the way to make a revolution and their overall work load decreases. There are WAY better ways of explaining it

Now, our illustrative Slow Stick's motor might draw 18.7A on the bench in static testing and then drop to like 16.2A in the air at WOT. The Sokol, on the other hand, might say 33A static but only 28.5A in the air. These numbers are just plucked from the proverbial hat, of course, but they work.

Man, that'd be a fast little Sokol

***In the case of SOME very high-rpm, coarse-pitched setups (mostly small pylon racers and the like) the prop will actually be stalled (same idea as a wing, really, but spinning) in static testing and then load up in the air (a stalled wing is carrying very little of the plane's weight; a stalled prop is producing very little thrust. Same idea), so the in-flight draw will be higher than the static. You're not likely to have this issue but it's useful info.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Static current draw Vs flight tpemak Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 4 Dec 08, 2009 03:27 AM
Discussion static current draw vs in flight current draw myp Power Systems 1 Nov 05, 2007 05:04 PM
Discussion In-flight Amp Draw vs. Static Amp Draw barmonkey Power Systems 19 Mar 30, 2007 08:57 PM
Current draw: static vs in flight bwanajim Electric Sailplanes 9 Oct 18, 2005 12:34 AM
Current draw: static vs. umm, NON-Static.. :) SmoothSL Foamies (Kits) 18 Oct 17, 2002 11:42 PM