Thread Tools
Jun 24, 2003, 06:24 PM
Schumacher USA

Tell us what YOU want!


The title sez it all - go nuts!

Personally, I want a 24 cell 70ish amp controller w/a BEC that will drive 6 standard size servos, but that's just me....

We strive to provide the cutting edge in an ever-changing industry, and Patrick's genius knows no bounds, so what's "on the horizon" as far as your needs go?

Shawn Palmer
Product Specialist
Castle Creations
www.castlecreations.com
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Jun 24, 2003, 08:37 PM
Registered User
wattsup's Avatar
Shawn,

How about:
a frequency channel scanner for under $75 or
a receiver with a built-in plane finder(beeper) or
a brushless controller that can handle twin motors or
an inexpensive Aiptek type digital camera control that plugs into the receiver or
a receiver that can be programmed at the field to any channel without having to change a crystal and weighing less than 10 grams or
a receiver that can identify a stalled or bad servo or
a receiver that beeps or flashes a light at turn on when there is interference on the frequency or the receiver power is low or
a receiver that can plug into a computer's USB port and be checked out for any problems by provided software or online by Castle Creations or
a brush/brushless motor ESC with digital real time power readout!

Regards,

wattsup
Last edited by wattsup; Jun 24, 2003 at 08:52 PM.
Jun 25, 2003, 06:05 AM
Registered User
Simply a change to the 35 and 45 controller to make them 40 & 50 respectively, although I know the controllers are deliberately underrated if the both could be uprated it would certainly level the playing field. There are many motor combinations that draw around the 35 amp mark where jumping to the 45 would be wise but this is then not as cost effective as other 40amp controllers.
Jun 25, 2003, 05:10 PM
Registered User
locomoto's Avatar
How about a Phoenix line that will smoothly and reliably start the new type of outrunner motors and some of the other European brands.
Jun 25, 2003, 05:18 PM
Been There! Done That!
boomerace's Avatar
I guess I'm the only one that likes the line already without needing more!
boomer
Jun 25, 2003, 05:34 PM
Schumacher USA
C'mon boomer!

Are you that easily pleased?

Shawn
Jun 25, 2003, 05:38 PM
Been There! Done That!
boomerace's Avatar
Quote:
Originally posted by Shawn Palmer
C'mon boomer!

Are you that easily pleased?

Shawn
That's just TODAY! I'm feeling mellow!
boomer
Jun 25, 2003, 07:08 PM
Heli Bouncer
Looooeeee!'s Avatar
OK, a big request, Smaller, lighter, cheaper, the Phoenix 10 and any of its smaller siblings. I want to get another Phoenix 10, but the Jeti 04-3 has some advantages, mainly price and physical size.... I run mostly really small BL motors anyway..
Jun 30, 2003, 06:16 PM
Motor Maniac
I would guess that we need higher advance on the brushless controllers to get more efficiency on the outrunner motors.

Also would like the Pixie20P to have a brake for flying S400 electric sailplanes with folding props. Yes, you can get the Sprite25, which has the brake, and maybe this is what the Pixie20P with a brake would end up weighing anyway.
Jul 01, 2003, 08:38 AM
Schumacher USA
I'll post this again elsewhere about the outrunners in more detail, but our controllers DO automatically run the outrunners at a high advance (28 to 35 deg depending on the motor).

Loooeee - Smaller lighter Pheonix 10 you say? You got it! Going into production in a month or two....

Shawn
Jul 01, 2003, 09:38 AM
Registered User
Steve McBride's Avatar
Quote:
Originally posted by Shawn Palmer


Loooeee - Smaller lighter Pheonix 10 you say? You got it! Going into production in a month or two....

Shawn
Since the cat is out of the bag -

I saw this ESC some weeks back and it looks really nice, light and small. You will be very happy with it I am sure.

Steve
Jul 01, 2003, 12:23 PM
Build more, websurf less
FlyingW's Avatar
Shawn,

I would like to see analysis and options for running an AXI 2820/10 with the Phoenix 45.

My setup runs roughly in the low and mid-range, but smoothly at full throttle. I tried a few tweaks with the timing and switching frequency, but the problem just became apparent at different RPMs.

This is currently OK for me, because I am using it in a sailplane application. But I plan to use it in a sport plane soon - and will them require smooth operation over the entire throttle range.

Thanks,

Paul
Jul 01, 2003, 12:29 PM
Schumacher USA
FlyingW - ongoing research is happening w/most outrunners right now - solutions forthcoming.

Shawn
Jul 01, 2003, 02:47 PM
Build more, websurf less
FlyingW's Avatar
Thanks,

I'll check here periodically.

Paul
Jul 02, 2003, 09:36 AM
Stress Be Gone
GBR2's Avatar
With the new USB programmer that is coming, I want the ability to set whatever LVC level I want rather than only choosing among a handful of choices.

I'd also like it to have the ability to update the firmware when newer stuff becomes available.

In other words more features than just what you can now do with a transmitter.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion History tells us what's next ... Tim Green Life, The Universe, and Politics 14 Aug 19, 2016 04:46 AM