New Products Flash Sale
Thread Tools
Old Jun 07, 2010, 12:31 PM
A.B. is online now
Find More Posts by A.B.
Registered User
A.B.'s Avatar
Discussion

IOM mast rule question


So I screwed up and made my mast tube to fit my 10.9mm mast tight and keel mounted, now if I wanted to use a larger diameter mast could I use a smaller insert in the bottom of a larger mast, or do i need to covert to a deck mounted mast?
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Jun 07, 2010, 10:34 PM
hew565 is offline
Find More Posts by hew565
Registered User
I am not sure about the rules, but Anders Wallin posted his plans for a finbox/mast box that uses a small opening for a 5mm mast foot. If it is not illegal, your 10.8mm one won't be!! It could be argued that his 5mm extension is smaller than the allowed minimum mast diameter, but it really is just a way to transfer the load from deck level to the bottom of the hull. No different than a compression post under a deck mounted mast, to me, anyway!

http://www.anderswallin.net/2006/11/...nbox-for-noux/
Old Jun 08, 2010, 09:10 AM
mfr02 is offline
Find More Posts by mfr02
Registered User
I think you'll find that the rules talk about the height of the mast above the deck, with no detail about whether the mast is deck stepped, keel stepped or something in between.
Old Jun 08, 2010, 09:53 AM
8387mike is offline
Find More Posts by 8387mike
Registered User
8387mike's Avatar
Ok this is interesting

Quote:
F.3.2 CONSTRUCTION
(a) A mast stub arrangement is permitted and, if used, shall be taken to be part
of the mast.
(b) Between the lower point and the upper point the spar section shall be:
(1) of circular outer shape,
(2) constant
within the variations permitted by F.3.4 except for the following permitted
items:
So a mast must be constant, what does that mean?
1) Constant size i.e. tapered lengths or different size mast widths
2) Constant lenght i.e. no joins

So how to get around this would be to insert a narrow shaft into the mast box and have a step on top of it, because unless you built the deck extremly strong it might colapse. So would this get around the above rules? would this be classified as a Step?
Old Jun 08, 2010, 03:16 PM
casy is offline
Find More Posts by casy
Registered User

mast stub


Hi all after reading 8387 mike's entry it kinda takes the fun out of sailing especially if you have to be a lawyer to interpet the rules have fun Casy
Old Jun 08, 2010, 06:40 PM
A.B. is online now
Find More Posts by A.B.
Registered User
A.B.'s Avatar
Could someone who has access to the IOM forum, please post question in the rule area? I have tried to get an account but did not work.

Thank you


Andrew
Old Jun 08, 2010, 09:57 PM
hew565 is offline
Find More Posts by hew565
Registered User
constant diameter... no taper. You can have two piece masts, with a joiner. The joiner can not be longer than 100 mm I think, but it makes carrying an A rig much easier!

The "Lower point" referred to above, is the point where the bottom of the sail cannot exceed (go below it), at the gooseneck. It would be hard to put any limitations on the section of the mast below the "Lower Limit Mark" because of the different vang arrangements.

I think you are good with your plans, although I made the move to a skinnier mast and would not go back to a larger mast!

Your question was posted and the thread is here ==> http://onemetre.sbmyc.com/forums/vie...hp?p=8435#8435
Last edited by hew565; Jun 08, 2010 at 10:11 PM.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Suggestion Language Rule question Jacques Flambeau Site Suggestions / Complaints 1 Apr 03, 2010 05:30 PM
Discussion AMA safety code rule 4 rewritten: 2010 AMA safety code rule 5 Thomas B AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics) 18 Jan 20, 2010 03:51 PM
Discussion Mast Question and Info Teamwoody Aerial Photography 4 Apr 14, 2008 07:51 AM
Help! Century 750 mast/rig question jensenflemming Sailboats 5 Mar 26, 2008 05:39 PM
Question Main Mast Question brucie1dog Coaxial Helicopters 2 Mar 01, 2005 12:12 PM