Originally Posted by Libelle201B
Given all of the complaints by conservatives about the poor and indigent in our society, wouldn't it be better for a woman of little means, on welfare to abort an unwanted child? It seems you folks cry constantly about the unborn, but once born, you want to provide nothing towards welfare babies, momma's ect. Maybe you can explain this disparity.
where is the sperm donor?
I really don't care how often or how many sexual partners someone might have in life. but If a guy wants to get a girl pregnant, then HE needs to take responsibility for the woman and child! Don't expect me to feed, cloth, and support their deed!
Same with the mother.... If she wants to spread her legs to every tom dick and harry, and joe smoe, then get pregnant don't come running to me for help. IMO it should be a crime to impregnate or get pregnant without the means to support the child.
So to answer you... No Abortion isn't the answer but improved sexual morality WOULD be the answer.
People need to be responsible for their own actions.
IMO welfare isn't/shouldn't be a crutch. It should be for misfortunes beyond our control.
And people already on the welfare system have absolutely no business creating more kids!
And No I do not see abortion as a means of birth control.