Thread Tools
May 19, 2010, 11:57 AM
I fly therefore I crash
fletchace's Avatar
Looks very tempting so far...

Fletch
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
May 19, 2010, 12:15 PM
"Aircraftus Fragmentum"
kydawg1's Avatar
carina111 -

Please look at proper SCALE landing gear for these jets. The landing gear (retracts) on some early photos for the new line of jets, looks WAY TOO SMALL for the aircraft.
May 19, 2010, 12:25 PM
Registered User
hklagges's Avatar
Hello there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by FresnoJay View Post
Mike, Its the SU in an awesomely lit pic
Here the original picture.

The sad thing is that we have this incredible runway on the former NATO airport Neubiberg which is freely accessible for anyone but you may not fly there :-(.

Cheers,
Henrik
May 19, 2010, 02:03 PM
Lori, hey, you're home early
CarreraGTSCS's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by hklagges View Post
Hello there,


Here the original picture.

The sad thing is that we have this incredible runway on the former NATO airport Neubiberg which is freely accessible for anyone but you may not fly there :-(.

Cheers,
Henrik
I have that plane! It sure is pretty. Too bad about the runway.

Mike
May 19, 2010, 03:20 PM
Registered User
hklagges's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarreraGTSCS View Post
I have that plane!
I only HAD it... too many crashes by now! But I bought it again, this time in green, again with 2x70mm fans. If only the wheather improves...

Cheers,
Henrik
May 19, 2010, 07:33 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by kydawg1 View Post
carina111 -

Please look at proper SCALE landing gear for these jets. The landing gear (retracts) on some early photos for the new line of jets, looks WAY TOO SMALL for the aircraft.
Hi. please see this website

http://www.lxhm.us/en/products_show....&id=169&flag=0

It is clear and close picture, how do you think this retract for mig29??

carina
May 19, 2010, 08:06 PM
Registered User
hi,this is LX mig29 camo color picture
May 19, 2010, 08:44 PM
Lori, hey, you're home early
CarreraGTSCS's Avatar
I think it looks great.

Carina111-- Is Lanxiang the same as LX Models?
May 19, 2010, 08:54 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarreraGTSCS View Post
I think it looks great.

Carina111-- Is Lanxiang the same as LX Models?
Lanxiang = LX
May 19, 2010, 09:26 PM
Lori, hey, you're home early
CarreraGTSCS's Avatar
Can I ask then a question unrelated to the MiG-29?

Last year I saw photos from one of the industry shows of an LX Panavia Tornado. Is LX planning to release the Tornado in the future? Very cool model.

Thanks,
Mike
May 19, 2010, 09:27 PM
I fly therefore I crash
fletchace's Avatar
Is this the next scheme?

Fletch
May 19, 2010, 11:21 PM
Registered User
SergeyK's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarreraGTSCS View Post
I think it looks great.
Yes, except the main wheels do look too small with the wrong strut shape, and the canopy shape is wrong. Apart from that, looks interesting.
May 19, 2010, 11:47 PM
Registered User
OneHundretMoons's Avatar
This plane surely looks nice, cant wait to see it in person in the shop from ready2fly.

I think they will get it in shortly...but not sure which one to pick...the mig-29 or the f-22...both very tempting...

ahh who cares...I just take both models

Regards

Neversommer.
May 20, 2010, 05:47 AM
"Aircraftus Fragmentum"
kydawg1's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by carina111 View Post
hi,this is LX mig29 camo color picture
That looks GREAT.
May 21, 2010, 02:43 PM
Registered User
hklagges's Avatar
Hello there,

Quote:
Originally Posted by carina111 View Post
Thanks for the links and the pictures. I think you can be proud on your product. If I compare it to Your Su-47 (I built one up from airframe only), it has several improvements:
  • Much better TV nozzles, with a plastic ball inside, more like the Su-34 from Freewing
  • Independent servos for the elevators and the TV nozzles
  • No sloppy linkage to the TV nozzles, but short, straight pushrods
  • Flaps with slats, which hopefully allow a lower landing speed so that it won't be damaged so much on those "perfect" landings
  • Ailerons independent from the slats and independent from the TV nozzles
  • Electric retracts that don't rely on servos
  • A hopefully better design for the parachute attachment or not :-)??
  • More lights :-)

Missing are for me:
  • Carbon fibre spars for the main wings, a must on the Su-47 with its flexing wings.
  • Bigger wheels.

Unclear are for me:
  • I don't believe yet the claimed weight of 2000 grams. The same figure was given for the Su-47 and I think it is practically impossible to reach. The Mig has more Servos and more functionality than the Su-47, so it will probably be heavier.
  • Unclear is whether the EDF fans are so bad as they were on the initial Su-47s (see the pictures I posted in the Su-47 thread).
  • I also don't believe yet the claimed thrust of 2.500 grams.

But still, big congratulations.

Cheers,
Henrik
Last edited by hklagges; May 21, 2010 at 02:49 PM.


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Discussion Flyfly mig 29 OVT ak MIG 35 amigob Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk 11 Oct 28, 2010 12:22 PM
Sold HET-RC Mig 29 Twin Fans Grey 3DTRYER Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) 0 Dec 07, 2009 10:15 PM
For Sale Mig-29 twin fan (including 2 X Het 6904mm fans 3DTRYER Aircraft - Electric - Jets (FS/W) 0 Jun 17, 2009 04:58 PM
Discussion new mig-29 twin fans to be out soon gazza2003au Foamy EDFs 11 Feb 24, 2009 05:08 PM
Discussion HET Mig-29 Vs FlyFly Mig 29 skydve76 Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk 2 Oct 06, 2008 12:32 PM