Thread Tools
Jul 10, 2013, 01:10 PM
Registered User
New material holds big energy hope.

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-material-big-energy.html
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Aug 07, 2013, 03:11 AM
Registered User
Battery design gets boost from aligned carbon nanotubes.

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-battery...nanotubes.html
Aug 08, 2013, 01:18 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axefly View Post
Battery design gets boost from aligned carbon nanotubes.

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-battery...nanotubes.html
oooh, nanotubes again.

I wont hold my breath...
Aug 16, 2013, 12:05 PM
Registered User
New flow battery could enable cheaper, more efficient energy storage.

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-battery...nt-energy.html
Nov 06, 2013, 07:04 AM
Proud to eat Kraut ;-)
Julez's Avatar
Lead Crystal Battery can cycle 3000 times last 20 years and deep discharge

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show....php?t=1977141
Nov 06, 2013, 07:17 AM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by Julez View Post
Lead Crystal Battery can cycle 3000 times last 20 years and deep discharge

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show....php?t=1977141
Curiously lead crystal was patented back in 1978... so if it was that fantastic why have we not seen it used before?
http://www.google.com/patents/US4143216
Nov 06, 2013, 07:34 AM
Suspended Account
Grimbeaver,
Patenting does not mean it is any use. It only means it is not a perpetual motion machine or similar, and it has not been patented before. That is all.
Nov 06, 2013, 08:17 AM
Registered User
That was not my point Mark. My point was that it's not a new idea and if it was a good idea it probably would have been further developed long before now.
Nov 07, 2013, 11:45 AM
UN Earth peoples true enemy
treehog's Avatar
better lead Crystal field battery

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show....php?t=1977141
enjoy

Ralf
Nov 07, 2013, 12:07 PM
Registered User
Quote:
Originally Posted by grimbeaver View Post
That was not my point Mark. My point was that it's not a new idea and if it was a good idea it probably would have been further developed long before now.
The answer to that is very simple and the topic has been beaten numb on scientific forums for a long time now, guess who have been holding back electric cars and battery development the past 5 decades or so...

At least now finally the wall is starting to break, they can't stop it as much as they did before, still... they are pushing as hard as they can.... but eventually electrics will prevail and nothing will stop it.
Nov 09, 2013, 03:51 AM
Suspended Account
Quote:
Originally Posted by Axefly View Post
The answer to that is very simple and the topic has been beaten numb on scientific forums for a long time now, guess who have been holding back electric cars and battery development the past 5 decades or so...

At least now finally the wall is starting to break, they can't stop it as much as they did before, still... they are pushing as hard as they can.... but eventually electrics will prevail and nothing will stop it.
I don't believe in conspiracy theories. From your smiley I gather you don't either.
But you do make good points. Electric will become the 'norm', but later rather than sooner. It has to. At present it is an expensive and usually impractical alternative, but no more. The only one that is remotely practical, because of its long range, is the Tesla with its biggest battery option. It is the only one where you stand a chance of not having to keep your present vehicle for longer journeys. Not fully there, but could work for many people. Thus not as expensive as it might look. And the only one that has 'pose value' too
Nov 09, 2013, 11:22 PM
Registered User
There have been many new battery technologies introduced over the years by many labs, but then they run into developmental times and costs. For example, the Rensselaer labs demonstrated a very high capacity battery technology over 5 years ago as a lab demo. Then offset potential enthusiasm by guesstimating a minimum of 10 years to develop the technology to the point it would be practical for use, and at least a hundred million bucks to start production. And shortly thereafter, China placed export limits on certain needed rare earth elements which they are nearly the only source of, further driving up both developmental costs and production costs. And if they are like many engineering personnel I worked with, their cost guesstimate didn't include the figures for a corporate profit margin and executive compensation and bonus package.
Dec 15, 2013, 08:27 AM
Proud to eat Kraut ;-)
Julez's Avatar
Sekisui Chemical claims cheap, long-range lithium battery tech

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57...-battery-tech/
Jan 27, 2014, 07:33 AM
Proud to eat Kraut ;-)
Julez's Avatar
Hydrogen Fuel Cells On the Way!!

https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5917

(a gem from 2001)
Jan 31, 2014, 03:30 PM
BrainFart RC-Pilot
TreeDiver's Avatar
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/1...run-on-enzymes

in case not reported


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Groundbreaking designs? mrittinger Electric Plane Talk 60 Oct 07, 2009 11:48 PM
Discussion New company looking for factory which could produce plane with our design unlimitedrc.eu Vendor Talk 0 Sep 29, 2009 07:03 AM
Help! Kind of like a nOOb all over again Need some general info RogueTitan Foamies (Scratchbuilt) 27 Sep 14, 2009 01:11 AM
New Product Micro Mosquito, some company for your PiccoZ... Pjotrrr Micro Ready-to-Fly 7 Aug 30, 2006 10:06 AM
Ion needed some company.... Chachin Electric Heli Talk 73 Jul 25, 2005 02:39 PM