|
||
|
Quote:
You have no basis for judging the reputability of the scientist OR the journal. Neither of that really matters because... 1. Many, if not most, good scientists have a few garbage papers here and there. 2. All journals, no matter how prestigious, publish fraud on a regular basis. The real judge of their quality is how good they are at publishing retractions. 3. We don't need to waste all this hot air. The proof is in the pudding! A battery advance was announced, and no battery materialized. That's plain old fraud. Weather it's straight up fraud, misrepresentation, or over-hyping it is still a fraudulent claim. You can take off your tinfoil hat. Batteries are not an energy source. If anything they'll cause energy consumption to increase. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Quote:
For now, I'm personally thrilled with the batteries that I use to power my airplanes. |
|
|
||
|
Quote:
It might not really be big oil that is against alternatives. Hopefully you know the reason we don't drill here in the US is because it's always been the plan to get our oil (relatively) cheap from 3rd world nations until it's all used up. When that oil becomes too expensive to profitably pump we'll still have massive reserves of oil to drill while everyone else pays excessive prices, or simply has to shut down and starve. That plan goes out the window if oil becomes obsolete before it's all used up. |
|
|
Last edited by jakestew; Oct 18, 2014 at 05:00 AM.
|
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Again your words are full of hot air, Post irrefutable proof to back up your claims. Quote:
http://phys.org/news/2014-10-ironcla....html#firstCmt O yes it is, they are also denying climate change: http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/...newable-energy http://phys.org/news/2013-12-koch-br...s-climate.html http://www.drexel.edu/~/media/Files/...%20Change.ashx |
|||
|
Last edited by Axefly; Oct 18, 2014 at 03:42 PM.
|
|||
|
||
|
Quote:
1. Nasa.gov cites two speculative works as "evidence" that carbon dioxide causes an increase in temperature. never mind the fact that even statistical correlation has not been established, there is a jump to causation. 2. various trends (not shown to be statistically significant) are peppered around the "evidence" website: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ 3. if you are a true scientist, you should be agnostic. not going according to "a-bunch-of-people-believe-it-with-no-mathematical-model-provided-hence-i-believe-it". 4. if someone cites correlation, without providing even the correlation coefficient or demonstrating the statistical significance of their hypothesis - be skeptical. if someone cites causation based on correlation, they do not even comprehend basic statistics. it is shameful that Nasa chooses to do so. |
|
|
||
|
||
|
Quote:
You're trying to prove what you know not to be true? There is NO better battery. It does not exist. How can you prove that it does? You're not making any sense here. I don't even understand what you're trying to say. That scientist claimed to have come up with an advance in battery technology. He OBVIOUSLY has not as NO better battery has been produced. That's plain and simple fact. No scientific claim is regarded as true until it can be demonstrated and replicated. I see no evidence that either has happened. Until then it's just a bunch of paper gibberish with no basis in reality, EVEN to other scientists. If you really think he's right then buy the stuff and make a battery. Then demonstrate it! Dead simple. If the claims were true then it would have happened. So AGAIN, put up or shut up. The advanced battery either exists or it doesn't. If it exists then SHOW me the battery, otherwise shut the hell up with your BS. You seem to have no concept of what constitutes proof and reality. |
|
|
||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
You are jumping up and down reverting to insults and trying to put words in my mouth because you have absolutely no proof to prove the scientist work to be fraudulent. |
|||
|
Last edited by Axefly; Oct 21, 2014 at 04:05 PM.
|
|||
|
|
|
Sorry all. Didn't mean for this to degenerate in this way.
I think something does need to be done about the plethora of fraudulent battery advance claims though. Keeping track of them would be a start. Someday when I have some free time maybe I'll put up a wikipedia page about false battery advancement claims. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ken, If you haven't done so already, take a look at the ignore feature. You'll be pleasantly surprised how enjoyable this feature can make the forums.
https://www.rcgroups.com/forums/prof...?do=ignorelist |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads | |||||
Category | Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question | Groundbreaking designs? | mrittinger | Electric Plane Talk | 60 | Oct 07, 2009 11:48 PM |
Discussion | New company looking for factory which could produce plane with our design | unlimitedrc.eu | Vendor Talk | 0 | Sep 29, 2009 07:03 AM |
Help! | Kind of like a nOOb all over again Need some general info | RogueTitan | Foamies (Scratchbuilt) | 27 | Sep 14, 2009 01:11 AM |
New Product | Micro Mosquito, some company for your PiccoZ... | Pjotrrr | Micro Ready-to-Fly | 7 | Aug 30, 2006 10:06 AM |
Ion needed some company.... | Chachin | Electric Heli Talk | 73 | Jul 25, 2005 02:39 PM |