


question on the smart parallel balance cards/boards? when parallel charging lets say 6S packs, if person accidentaly plugs in the balance charge plug from one of the packs backwards will it spark? or open up and go black? someone asked me and I dont know answer/and I dont want to try it LOL
either person plugged backards OR like what happened in post #1461 manufacture soldered plug reversed. thanks! Joe 






Quote:
Glen 






I believe this is the key to the limiting and not the 12V, though you are near the max power of a 12V supply.
This message indicates that if the PL8 attempts to draw any more current from your power supply that the voltage becomes unstable and varies up and down so much that the PL8 is having trouble using it. A capacitor on the output of the power supply would help clean up that noise, but maybe it is best to just replace it with a quality 24V supply if you plan to use it with the PL8. 





I've noticed something a little odd with my PL8. On all of my 3s packs (I have 3 Hyperion G3s) the Ri for cell number 3 shows approximately 3 times higher than cells 1 and 2. As noted this occurs on all 3 packs. Cells 1 and 2 are usaully ~3µΩ and cell #3 is usually 9µΩ to 11µΩ.
Using the same packs and same FMA manufactured node adpater with my Cellpro 10s, all cells are ~3µΩ. Oddly, my 6s and 8s packs when charged on the PL8 don't show this variance. 





Quote:







14.38V * 33.8A = 487 W would be the input to the PL8 not the output. IOTAs are noted for having extremely clean / stable output and are often used with high end car audio equipment but they could have a capacitor to start going out.
16A X 25.2V (6S) =403 watt output and looks about right efficiency wise so the question remains why only 487 watts from the ps and why noisy? I would try running the ps in parallel with a Pb and see what happens. I assume that PL8's input is set for min. 12 V and max of 50 amps. Charles 





I had two Cellpro 10s failures in less than a month so Jamie Marks gave me a upgrade to PL8. I upgraded to combo 4 with parallel charging. The upgrade was reasonably priced and I appreciate FMA's customer service.
My question for group on this thread is what are the major advantages of the PL8 compared to the Cellpro 10S? Thanks in advance for your input. Bill 
Latest blog entry: Eleven Hobby T28 review, upgrades and...





Well with 12V / 50A input 500 watts versus 160 watts output. 25 memories(presets) versus 6, 100 watts internal discharge versus none,about 2,000 plus more available settings for tweaking, 4 buttons to move around easy versus the two on the CP10 and that does not scratch the surface. Post #1 has the PL8 specs. as a starting point and you can download the CCS from their site ,link in first post.
Charles 





So for 6S 5A Battery charging with the PL8 and a single IOTA DLS55, what would be the available amperage for charging.
On the IOTA we know we have 55 Amps at about 13.6V. The PL8 takes 50 Amps input but can produce only 516 Watts to charge with at 13.6v input. There needs to be an efficiency factor for the PS and the PL8 of 8090%. Are the full 30 amps available for 6S 5A charging on 13.6vdc ? Without efficiency factors taken into account yet (to keep it simple), would this calculation be correct 516w/25.2v=20.48a ? If the above calc would be correct without efficiency then would a safe bet be to calc using 8090% of the 516w? 413w464w range with efficiency? Then 413/25.2=16.38 to 464/25.2=18.4 resulting in 16.38 amps to 18.4 amps available for charging on 6S 5A packs? 16.38/5 = 3.28 packs to 18.4/5 = 3.68 packs at 1C (obviously you can't have fractional packs, I'm just trying to clarify the math, it really mean available headroom) ? I'm still working on understanding the math and the effects of a single 12v PS on the PL8. Thanks for your patience, Brownie 





Quote:
There is definitely something wrong here. Charles made a good suggestion to parallel the output of your PSU with a 12V Pb battery. You could also try powering the PL8 ONLY with a fully charged 12V Pb battery. Steve also informed you quite accurately about what could be happening with your supply voltage. I would not be so quick to rule out the possibility that something is not proper with your supply. The message you are getting in the CCS is quite clear. This does not mean that there couldn't be a problem with the PL8, but it should be easy enough to rule out the PSU as the problem. Check the next post I am going to make. I'll answer another customer's question directly and this will also answer the balance of your question. Tim Marks 






Quote:
If you can open the attached zip file in Excel, your question can easily be answered using Question 4. If you use the spreadsheet and input the specs you provided, the answer is 22.9A. http://www.revolectrix.com/support_docs/item_1301.zip Here is the math of the spreadsheet: 13.6v * 50A = 680W * .85 (worst case efficiency) = 578W Battery voltage at end of charge = 4.2 * 6 = 25.2V 578W / 25.2V = 22.94A Tim Marks 






Quote:
Thanks. It looks like the phrase "light years better" seems appropriate. Thank you. Bill 

Latest blog entry: Eleven Hobby T28 review, upgrades and...





Quote:
Glen 






I too have been getting the "supply noise" error. I'm using an Iota DLS 45 charging four 5s 5000 lipos in parallel. Power supply output voltage is about 13.6v. If I charge at 20A total I will sometimes get the error. If I cut back to 19.5 A all is well. If I attach the jumper on the power supply that increases the voltage to 14.5v I can charge up to 21A.



Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Category  Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Discussion  Sneak Peek! 2, 1:8 scale scratchbuilts  ooby  Scale Boats  34  May 22, 2015 11:41 PM 
Discussion  Proposed schemes for 2010 season RAF BAe Hawk displaysneak peek!  Matt Halton  Electric Ducted Fan Jet Talk  3  Dec 20, 2009 04:11 AM 
Discussion  Sneak Peek at the New Creation Museum  Miami Mike  Life, The Universe, and Politics  38  May 30, 2007 06:01 PM 
Hey Mr. Lin, how about a sneak peek at the Hellcat?  splatman  GWS (Grand Wing Servo)  1  Jul 05, 2003 05:43 AM 