New Products Flash Sale
Thread Tools
Old Oct 22, 2009, 03:37 PM
xxxvizard is offline
Find More Posts by xxxvizard
Registered User

Super cub vs Super cub lp vs super cub lp bnf vs easystar.

Super cub vs Super cub lp vs super cub lp bnf with blade cx2 transmitter vs easystar(for a beginner who doesn't have a coach and has barely ever flown rc planes before).
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Oct 22, 2009, 03:40 PM
Belem is offline
Find More Posts by Belem
Foam flogger
I'd say the BNF wins as it's 2.4 ghz and has a aileron channel built in.
Old Oct 22, 2009, 03:55 PM
AD. is offline
Find More Posts by AD.
Team Better Than Yours
AD.'s Avatar
AXN clouds fly or if you want one from the list Supercub LP BNF
Old Oct 22, 2009, 04:06 PM
John Sargent is offline
Find More Posts by John Sargent
Registered User
John Sargent's Avatar
Depends what price you are paying and what you want to do with it. There are probably some deals out there on the old faithful models.
Old Oct 22, 2009, 04:29 PM
rafe_b is offline
Find More Posts by rafe_b
Registered User
EasyStar is probably a bit faster and heavier than the SuperCub. Of course, it is far less "scale looking." The belly-landing nature of the plane, and its pusher prop offer lots of advantages for a newb. Plus, I hear the RTF version of the EasyStar comes with a decent (72 MHz) radio and uses standard components...

The only hop-up I'd suggest (from a stock RTF EasyStar) would be to use a large 2S lipo in place of the NiCd or NiMH battery pack. It's not like you need a large battery, but you'll need some extra weight up front, to get the CG right.

After you've flown the EZStar a bunch, you might also want to upgrade its motor to brushless. With the stock motor, you're best advised to avoid winds above, say, 5-8 mph.
Old Oct 22, 2009, 06:23 PM
Xpress.. is offline
Find More Posts by Xpress..
Team Hitec, Customer Support
Xpress..'s Avatar
Please try to refrain from posting threads that ask basically the same question.
Old Oct 22, 2009, 07:27 PM
realtimerecon is offline
Find More Posts by realtimerecon
Real Time Recon
realtimerecon's Avatar
I say, buy the parts that make up the body of the S.C. & build it the way U want.The parts that are checked off,for a total of $62.00...RTR
Old Oct 22, 2009, 08:57 PM
rafe_b is offline
Find More Posts by rafe_b
Registered User
^^^ Yes, I agree -- by all accounts, the SuperCub is an excellent airframe, and $62 is about the going price for a foam ARF of that size. Building it from parts makes sense.
Old Oct 23, 2009, 02:27 PM
Smokescreen38 is offline
Find More Posts by Smokescreen38
Checking CG is for NERDS!
Smokescreen38's Avatar
The Supercub is a honey, no doubt... but I have about 20 planes including fast EDFs, scale warbirds on steroids, etc... and I always come back to my Easystar andf I long ago got bored and parted out my BL/lipo Hobbyzone Supercub.

Compared to the Supercub, the Easystar is an elegant, graceful and efficient flyer...on the stock brushed motor, it flies fine but with the drop-in F27 StrykerC BL motor, it has an incredibly broad flight envelope on 3s- from almost gymnasium fly-able to a high speed cruiser.

This plane will be the one that earns its spot in your transmitter's memory...Mine is my all weather flyer- it takes off brilliantly from powdery snow, thermals extremely well for a trainer-type plane and will fly forever on a 2200 pack. I have documented a 1+ hour flight with no help from thermals.

So- of the two planes, the Easystar wins in my book...

...but it will require you to assemble the kit (very easy...but still) and source your own electronics...which is not an easy task for a first plane.

Hopefully this will help:

ARF kit:

Multiplex's suggested power system:

Stryker motor:
Turnigy ESC:


A pair of Hobbycity's finest 9g servos:

would also fly fine on:

Any Spektrum rx (if that's what you're using)


battery connectors:
Last edited by Smokescreen38; Oct 23, 2009 at 03:00 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2009, 02:59 PM
rafe_b is offline
Find More Posts by rafe_b
Registered User
The Turnigy 2835 inrunner -- usually the 2200 Kv version -- is a perennial favorite for powering the EasyStar. If I were building one again (from an ARF kit) I'd use that from the get-go. Fantastic little motor, with 3S lipo and APC 6x4 prop.
Old Jan 06, 2010, 01:38 PM
MyMonkey is offline
Find More Posts by MyMonkey
Registered User
So, for a true beginner most here would recomend the Easy Star over the Super Cub LP?
Old Jan 06, 2010, 02:08 PM
donsinger1 is offline
Find More Posts by donsinger1
aka KF7DS
No, Super Cub. More responsive than Easystar in my experience and just fun to fly. I have crashed and built quite a few and when I fly and take two planes, one is always the SC.
Old Jan 06, 2010, 03:02 PM
Silver Streak is offline
Find More Posts by Silver Streak
Registered User
I don't have the experience of others in the thread, but when I'm bored and want a change of pace my SC is where I go back to. If I'm at the field alone and the wind is light I get a kick out of doing hammerheads on either end of the runway with touch and goes in between. I do wish it had more power and it may be time for a new motor or BL/lipo conversion.

Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Product finally a new Super Cub LP BNF. MerlinKing Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 73 Jul 31, 2011 01:29 PM
Discussion Easy Star vs Super Cub rel North Coast Electric Flyers 16 May 10, 2008 10:48 AM
Discussion Super Cub vs. Super Decathlon thrashaero Parkflyers 3 Aug 15, 2007 02:06 AM
Discussion HZ Super Cub vs. PZ Slo-V biphfyt Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 9 Nov 03, 2006 01:48 AM
Super Decathlon vs the J-3 Cub Travy Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 7 Mar 01, 2005 07:41 AM