|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alameda, CA
Joined Dec 2006
2,922 Posts
|
Guys, I would be interested in your opinions after trying the ST with an APC 11x7. A friend requested that I set up his plane with that prop, and he just loves it - very solid and sustained hovers, with no visible torque roll.
I've raised the question before - SF vs e-style props, and would be interested in your opinions after trying the 11x7. Steve |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Burke, VA
Joined Sep 2009
3,972 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get how a 7 pitch prop would sustain a hover with no slip/cavitation and how 11" would not induce a torque roll.
Also, your friend mike like it because he has nothing to compare it to and the 11-7 is the most power in a plans he has had, tho it's still not the best option. IMHO this plane is on the verge of needing an E prop but it can use an sf just fine. I hate E props. They just don't have any bottom end. If the motor has too much power for an sf then I use a wooden prop like a VESS or xoar. If the sf os pulling too many amps just lower the pitch but if it's flexing then you need to not use SFs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IMO the gws dd orange props are more flexible than the apc SF props, especially at the tips. I would also think that they may tend to flatten/flex some on spool up. So maybe thats whats giving it more bite. As for torque, I believe they are lighter than apc's so flatening/flexing some and less weight may contribute some there too. IDK just a guess????
|
|
|