|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Jan 2012
12 Posts
|
Maybe they used to make them better. My Radian and my son's are almost new. The failures in my son's are way worse than mine. I'm all for a DIY Radian, it's a great Sailplane. My son has 3 other Parkzone planes and I have the T-28. so far, the quality problems are all Radian problems. It's incredibly disheartening to spend almost $100 bucks a couple times a year knowing each time it's due to poor quality. The Radian is awesome with quality connectors, esc, servos, etc. I am progressivly modifying to the Paul Naton Radian, the less Parkzone parts the better. I have never had a failure with my woodies I could attribute to quality, go figure!
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quality
Quote:
The stock Radian flys very, very well. There are many suggested improvements but you need to weigh their importance to how you fly. Tweaking for maximum performance is not the same thing as increasing reliability. |
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
OK -WARNING- this is just comedy ... I am not a nut- well Ok maybe i am - but I am not one of "those" nuts.. just trying to tap in to the UFO Youtubers and give them a little "poke"
![]()
|
||
|
|||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a better shot of the broken control arm and my fix with a new Great Planes nylon arm. I moved the new arm to a better position and reinforced the elevator with thin plywood.
I lost my first Radian to a broken control arm but didn't realized it until I saw this after the second flight on my replacement bird. I would have lost two of them because of crappy hardware. A better solution than the Dubro hub is a clevis. It would bring the push rod into better alignment. I plan to do that for next season. Cliff |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Josh |
|
|
Latest blog entry: VIDEO: Real Helicopter Rescues Hangar 9...
|
||
|
|
|
|
Windsor, Canada, near Detroit
Joined Jul 2007
3,782 Posts
|
badbad plane?
perhaps because before i had 2 (still have, and fly them) 2 meters sailpanes that were a handful, and then i got a rad, i see things under another perspective.
or maybe, as i said before, am the luckiest fellow in the planet. but my rad has been just great. it was until now that i faced a problem: when launching, the prop flew away and the plane fell. i saw where the prop/spinner fell and picked it up. i noticed a small nut loose inside. when i came home i removed the 2 screws that hold the spinner in place, lifted the spinner and installed and tightened up the nut and the screws and it is again ready to fly. so from now on, i will add this to my check list. that's all. am i complaining? of course not! besides this, the plane has been just wonderful. so a small incident like this means nothing. things get loose now and then. in any plane. but nothing else has been wrong. nothing. maybe after all this time the makers solved the problems that some have faced-as it happens with all new products-just look at the cars recalls! but, brittle horns? loose wings? whatelse? no crashes, great landings-the club has a small runway that looks more like an aircraft carrier deck (small), so it's great for practicing close landings-without crashing. hunting for thermals at dawn, when i fly, is quite a challenge, but am beginning to get the feeling and stretching the times a little bit every flight. couldn't be happier. lucky? maybe. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Joined Aug 2011
496 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() In the last couple of years I have used Gold 'n Rods on the PKZ horns as a normal mod for me before any maiden. As I was close to installing Gold 'n Rods on my Stubby V 2.0, I decided to see what I could do using the stock control rods and horns. One observation I have is that the swivel is stressed in the hole because the control rods come at them from the fuselage not in the same plane as the horns rotate. I always try to not stress the horns by having the rods coming at the swivel in the same plane as it rotates using Z bends. This is not an issue when using Gold 'n Rods and their clevis. But it is a problem with a swiviel whether it is the Dubro shown in my pictures or the original PKZ. So starting here https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=DBDE7...5DDCB92%211359 is my attempt to de-stress the installation. I used a 5/64" dremel bit in my fingers to enlarge the hole in the horn. I do this when using the Gold 'n Rods clevis. But for this swivel installation, I CA'ed the washers on the horn to reinforce the enlarged horn hole. BTW, I also tried for the first time a tip from Naton about using CA on the horn hole at the servos to build up a CA bearing to reduce thrashing and slop. Wow! does that work great. No wingle room on the ELE and RUD at all. I also bent in a Z at the servos to get the horns working in the same plane as the rods. The horn is not pushing up or down from its plane of rotation. Enjoy... Alan |
|
|
|
|
|
Windsor, Canada, near Detroit
Joined Jul 2007
3,782 Posts
|
speaking of horns...
Alan, now that you are providing details of your way to relieve stress to the horns, i must say that the only functional thing i have done to the rad is that i bent the pushrods so there is no stress; the 1 to the rudder just to an angle so it does not force the horn and runs smooth into the sleeve, and for the 1 to the elevator i did a 'z' bend. both run as smooth as it can be.
i didn't mention this before for it seemed to me an obvious thing to do, but, as i see that it is not done regularly and is a big issue, better say it now, in case it is of some help. it is the only mod that i think the rad needs, and it is an easy 1. regards |