|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
So how much has the "black" tag range increased? And - are they now waterproof? (a great improvement if they are) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Sep 2008
1 Posts
|
Hello,
Very nice review. We are french Retailer and we made tests for this loc8tor lite & Loc8tor Plus. Very nice products aned very usefull for airplanes and T-Rex ... . Our video and product description is on this page : http://www.openplay.fr/systeme-de-ge...-pr-16524.html And on this other for Plus version : http://www.openplay.fr/systeme-de-ge...-pr-16620.html Nice to see that Loc8tor is pleasant for Hobbies ![]() Regards, Fabian @ OPENPLAY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Oct 2007
2 Posts
|
I have the full range Loc8tor, and I have not been impressed with it. I tested it a couple of times and found that I had to be much closer to the tag than the manufacturer's claim to get it to work.
The one time I really needed it to work, when I lost a plane, it didn't pick up a signal and was of no use. I no longer bother with using it on planes. I have found it ok for locating keys inside the house. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sydney
Joined Jan 2006
63 Posts
|
Interesting Product!
Looked at the website & the "Plus" & the "Lite" show 600' & 400' respectively in their info, but both show the same in their Range "Graphs". See that manufacturer has responded previously. Could we be advised of the actual difference in range for the two units? Cheers, John H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Oct 2007
2 Posts
|
According to the manufacturer's website the Loc8tor Lite ' finds tagged items up to an incredible 122 metres / 400 feet' and '122 metre / 400 feet range is based on clear line of sight. Actual range may increase or decrease depending on use, environment and location'
For Loc8tor plus '183 metre / 600 feet range is based on clear line of sight. Actual range will vary depending on use, environment and location' So the plus model claims 50% further maximum range. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys,
After reading a review last year of the Loc8ter, I went ahead and took the plunge. I put them in my two most expensive birds, a 30% scale Yak-54 gasser, and a 1/5 scale Stearman. I put the tag in the rasied panel section in the canopy of the Yak reasoning that if the canopy ever blew off the plane that I'd be able to find it. In the Stearman I found a spot just below a cockpit lined with thin balsa. I performed a similar real-world test by having a buddy walk into the woods and place the canopy randomly in a spot. He came back and pointed to the general direction and off I went. I had to get within 40-50 feet of it to get a signal as it was in a bit of a dip in the ground and behind a tree. But in my mind, this was entirely acceptable as you will have a general idea (hopefully) where the model went down. My verdict? Well worth the money for the piece of mind knowing that you are probably not going to lose an expensive bird or it's components in the event of a mishap. Best, Dave |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
have one question.. how often should i replace the little batteries in the tags? or is there a way to turn them OFF like i can the Loc6tor unit?
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
crsahing around in mid-europe
Joined Jan 2007
227 Posts
|
Hi Folks.
Nice to see that the producer is active here! Thanks <TR> at loc8tor for the discount offer. That will probably increase sales I’m sure! I did enquire long ago to loc8tor, but now I will be buying one. Can you please advise as to whether it is possible to increase the practical working range, bearing in mind that most of us would be looking for a downed plane, rather than a set of keys (the main original stated purpose). Failing that, will you be working to improve the range, now that you are aware of our use for the loc8tor? Perhaps you can confirm the comments regarding Antenna length from <Ozzy Bear>, or do you have any other suggestions/ideas for us? [QUOTE=Ozzy Bear]Found this whilst trawling the web Cracking open a tag . . The only thing that might be impeding performance is the fact that the integrated antenna on the tag board is wrapped around the board’s perimeter. A straight dipole antenna, like the one in the receiver, might perform better. . . QUOTE] Most people here are acquainted with soldering irons etc, so your practical advice for our consideration would be much appreciated. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined Sep 2008
1 Posts
|
Tried this a few months ago. If you fly FPV and use 2.4GHz transmitters, the homing signal will be completely masked. However, if you wait until your video transmitter's battery dies, then it should function normally.
I do not recommend this for FPV fliers since it can be hard to determine the start of one's search area unless you've got some good video of the plane spiraling in! |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Manchester, UK
Joined Apr 2005
846 Posts
|
I have removed the batteries and wired it into the BEC using a small 3v regulator which fits inside the case. I know that it will not work if I have a complete system failure and lose power but at least it should work if I land in long grass or trees.
Richard |
|
|