|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Here's a youtube video of someone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ri6dnjrq8Lg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johns comments are pretty much right on, as are Tuans observations. I am thinking that John's Hand Launch experience is being applied to his thermal flying. I too advocate less Rudder to Aileron mixing. When I have other people take a turn on my models, I often see them stalling around as they try to tighten up the circle. I suggest you use as much Rudder to Aileron mixing as necessary to suit your comfort level. Learn to recognize that too much Rudder added to a circle will speed the model up and screw it in to the ground. You are better off to use less rudder coupling and add Rudder in to the circle as you need it. The restriction will be your vision, since you have to really be able observe your model to be able to circle out at the limits of your vision uncoupled. If you find the model getting out of sorts at the fuzzy range, you can add a little more R-A mixing to keep it easier to manage. If you find yourself out there to often you might consider a little expo to soften the control jabs a little too! Remember Handling Trumps Max performance,since unintended inputs kill performance. Larry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry, do your R/A mixing comments go along with a model that requires outboard aileron to keep from continuing to roll? Not my Xplorer but another model wants to continue to increase the roll angle as it goes around the turn, so I have to feed it outboard aileron while holding elevator. Or is this more related to aileron differential???
Todd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Todd,
I would have to fly the specifice setup , but the indication you have mentioned sounds like spiral instability, to much dihedral or to little vertical tail volume. I am trying to think where to much Diff might cause the problem but the negative aileron is usually much more benign, compared to much positive Aileron causing Nose swings. For further discussion contact me offline, I don't want to discuss a model I have no experience with. In regards to the Explorer it is a very well mannered airplane that should reward their owners with many satisfying flights. LJ |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
John |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Oh yes indeed Larry, the Xplorer is an amazing flying airplane!
Here's a pic of mine before or after her maiden flight. Can you see me smiling A friend (who's very good searching RCGroups and Mark Drela posts) pointed me to a number of Mark's posts on the differential debate. I guess I'll have to give it a try....... And now back to our Xplorer specific postings.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, for what it's worth, the tendancy for a glider to increase its bank while in a circling type of turn, really any turn for that matter, is that the outboard wing has a faster airspeed than the inside wing, and thus it generates more lift. If the turn is properly coordinated this will happen. When applying opposite aileron to maintain wing bank angle in a turn the coupled A/R acts to yaw the glider out of the turn, or cause slip, not tighten the turn to cause skid, or spiral it out of the sky. More A/R coupling helps to coordinate the roll manuever to enter the turn. Once in a constant energy, constant bank angle turn, then less A/R mix would be helpful. But you could simply push on the rudder stick to keep the fuselage level throughout the turn as you apply outside aileron (called cross control) Easy to learn to do too.
2 cents from me. Cheers, Mike |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
So leadfoot, thats the face behind all the questions. JT |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
JT, you know "atjurhs" is aka grasshopper, or did I graduate to MudMinow???
Yes, that the ugly mug that's been taking the conventionally accepted aileron diff approach, but after reading many of MD's posts on the topic may just give the alternative method a shot. BTW, that bright orange really showed up nicely in the gray sky! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birmingham, AL
Joined Sep 2003
359 Posts
|
Todd:
Did you decide on any trim colors for the bottom of the Explorer wing? I saw where you were considering vinyl tape for a white stripe on the underside of the wing. I tried some vinyl tape I got from an auto custom shop for some stripes on my Superior wing tips. It went on easy enough but was kinda thick. I ended up taking it off and using the monokote stick on trim. It worked well and is still on there and looks good. John |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey John,
I was planning on trying the monokote stick on trim on a leftover wingtip panel (from a different plane) later tonight. You just used Windex and monokote stick on trim, right? The other question I have is chrome or white? I'm leaning towards white, unless someone stands up and swears how wonderful chrome stands out??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Birmingham, AL
Joined Sep 2003
359 Posts
|
No Windex needed. There is a good adhesive surface present after you peel off the paper backing. Sticks firmly right to the gelcoat with some gentle pressure. I used a credit card to smooth it on and avoid bubbles.
I have been underwhelmed with reflective surfaces on the underside of the wing. It just mirrors the ground most of the time and shows up dark at altitude. The leading edge if trimmed with chrome does provide some flash on turns into the sun, but I always worried about dirtying up the leading edge with trim material. Maybe unfounded. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redlands, Ca
Joined Dec 2004
1,719 Posts
|
Hi Sleep4,
You can use a thinner vinyl that is just as opaque but thinner. Most of the vinyl used by sign shops and the like is known as intermediate vinyl. This is anywhere from 3-mils to 5-mils thick, on average. If you go for high performance vinyl, it will be from 2-mils to 3 mils thick. You can feel this difference quite easily. Also, high performance vinyl typically has a better finish to it and will withstand direct sunlight for up to 7 years without peeling, cracking, or fading. I use this stuff for cutting vinyl lettering on my planes, like AMA number, aircraft name, tail lettering, etc. People who attend Visalia normally see me out there cutting lettering for them in a small booth. High performance vinyl is more expensive, but you get better handling, stability and it is thinner...and I would recommend white, as the reflective stuff just doesn't providde the effect you are looking for, which is contrast so you can see the plane easier. Mike |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Discussion RADINA 2 by NAN models | Pinci | Hand Launch | 38 | Feb 11, 2009 12:58 AM |
| Question Speed 1.5 /Nan Models. Alex Mini 1.5 setup question | Broncomech | Slope | 20 | Jul 23, 2008 09:47 PM |
| Discussion Nan Models Shadow ( sorry for the mistake ) | Chipwillis | Thermal | 56 | Apr 19, 2007 04:44 PM |