|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zerts:
If it got better with just switching props odds are the OEM prop is not well balanced. Try balancing the prop before doing anything radical. The stock E-Flite prop that came on the original motor was pretty good, but the spare I purchased at the same time was terrible, so there is probably a large variation. An inexpensive prop balancer is a good investment, particularly if you have a high rpm dd motor on a fast airframe. I have found that APC props are generally not too bad but AeroNaut props are all waaaaaay out of balance. A combination of sanding the heavy side and adding clear nail polish to the light side will get them to balance. IME it not only makes a difference in the vibration but also makes the prop more efficient so you get more time out the same number of mAh. FC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, AZ, Chandler
Joined Nov 2007
1,835 Posts
|
FC,
Thanks, the props were new and I didn't run the prop balance on them, assumed they were balanced because they were new. I frequently use Mrs Z's purple nail polish for marking purposes etc, so she keeps a close eye on me that I don't use it for socially non-acceptable purposes
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Lesson learned? Anyway, new props need balancing. You'd be surprised how nice it is fly with a balanced prop. It is more efficient plus it saves motor bearings and reduces stress on the mount, airframe and the like. |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
I've used APC props without issue - gave the one stock prop I bought to a friend that had an F4u that had just broken the three blade pulling it out of the car...
Glad to see the lipo is ok
|
|
Latest blog entry: Traxxas XO-1 Destroyed by Curb!
|
|
|
|
|
|
USA, AZ, Chandler
Joined Nov 2007
1,835 Posts
|
It just may be the prop was out of balance because this setup probably runs at a much higher rpm than my other stuff, and along with the fact the motor mount has so much flexibility, that is creating the vibration.
My other planes have the motor mounted behind the firewall and there is noticeably less "give" in the motor mounting in all of them, compared to the T-28. |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Flying style or the C rating may be a factor. Maybe you're lipos have more voltage in em after a charge than mine do. Interesting stuff... Bill |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Latest blog entry: Well...
|
||
|
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Article ParkZone T-28 Trojan RTF Review | Jim Walker | Electric Warbirds | 776 | May 12, 2013 02:01 PM |
| Official Parkzone P-51 Owners Thread - Part 2 | monitor | Parkflyers | 2601 | Oct 15, 2012 05:41 PM |
| Discussion Parkzone T-28 Trojan Thread | Edge767 | Parkflyers | 6527 | Jun 04, 2008 05:29 AM |
| Sold Parkzone T-28 Trojan, 480 960kv Motors (2) | Joe in Dublin | Aircraft - Electric - Power Systems (FS/W) | 4 | Jan 17, 2008 01:34 PM |
| Wanted Parkzone T-28 Trojan | webejpn01 | Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) | 4 | Oct 25, 2007 02:48 PM |