HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
 
Thread Tools
Old Jan 06, 2003, 02:12 PM
Mike
Guest
n/a Posts
Jeti Micro 4 Receiver

Hi,
Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying etc.
thanks
Mike


Old Jan 06, 2003, 03:32 PM
Allan Feld
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver

Jeti-4 is not quite a full range receiver, however better than most limited
range receivers. For general purpose I would highly recommend the tiny
Schulze 435 IPD, which performs extremely fine. I my club we have several
Schulze receivers and I've never heard anything but people being very
satisfied. Further it's only little more expensive than Jeti.

I have a couple of Jeti-4 myself and have experienced problems with E-planes
indoor and outdoor. After I started using Schulzes I only use Jetis for HLG
and Slope.

Regards Allan

"Mike" <brdlands@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:avcn2u$aug$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
> Hi,
> Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
> unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying

etc.
> thanks
> Mike
>
>



Old Jan 06, 2003, 05:22 PM
Brett
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver

i only use jetis on my foamies and anything that doesnt get affected by
glitches eg floaters. I have had glitches from my jeti in the past.

but i have been told jetis are much better these days.


"Allan Feld" <allan.feld@mail.tele.dk> wrote in message
news:3e19f332$0$127$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk. ..
> Jeti-4 is not quite a full range receiver, however better than most

limited
> range receivers. For general purpose I would highly recommend the tiny
> Schulze 435 IPD, which performs extremely fine. I my club we have several
> Schulze receivers and I've never heard anything but people being very
> satisfied. Further it's only little more expensive than Jeti.
>
> I have a couple of Jeti-4 myself and have experienced problems with

E-planes
> indoor and outdoor. After I started using Schulzes I only use Jetis for

HLG
> and Slope.
>
> Regards Allan
>
> "Mike" <brdlands@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:avcn2u$aug$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > Hi,
> > Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
> > unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying

> etc.
> > thanks
> > Mike
> >
> >

>
>



Old Jan 06, 2003, 05:32 PM
Mike
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver

Thanks to both of you.
I suspected the Jeti wasn't performing as it should and you both confirmed
my suspicions.
Mike

"Brett" <brett@juggler:-)magician.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e6oS9.972$387.691@news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk...
> i only use jetis on my foamies and anything that doesnt get affected by
> glitches eg floaters. I have had glitches from my jeti in the past.
>
> but i have been told jetis are much better these days.
>
>
> "Allan Feld" <allan.feld@mail.tele.dk> wrote in message
> news:3e19f332$0$127$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk. ..
> > Jeti-4 is not quite a full range receiver, however better than most

> limited
> > range receivers. For general purpose I would highly recommend the tiny
> > Schulze 435 IPD, which performs extremely fine. I my club we have

several
> > Schulze receivers and I've never heard anything but people being very
> > satisfied. Further it's only little more expensive than Jeti.
> >
> > I have a couple of Jeti-4 myself and have experienced problems with

> E-planes
> > indoor and outdoor. After I started using Schulzes I only use Jetis for

> HLG
> > and Slope.
> >
> > Regards Allan
> >
> > "Mike" <brdlands@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
> > news:avcn2u$aug$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
> > > Hi,
> > > Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a

little
> > > unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park

flying
> > etc.
> > > thanks
> > > Mike
> > >
> > >

> >
> >

>
>



Old Jan 07, 2003, 02:22 AM
Greg Middleton
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003 19:57:16 -0000, "Mike" <brdlands@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Hi,
>Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
>unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying etc.
>thanks
>Mike


I found that one of the older Jeti Rex 4 receivers was very poor,
short range and vulnerable to interference. They claim to have
improved it and have a Mk2 version but I'm not wasting my money to
find out.

Greg
Old Jan 07, 2003, 04:32 AM
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver


Mike wrote:

> Hi,
> Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
> unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying etc.
> thanks
> Mike
>



Well I was a bit dubious, so I range checked mine, and it was fine at
300 meters - rock solid. I haven't flown it yet.

Judging by the collapsed antenna range its about half the range of a
standard futaba.

I you can wait a week or two, I'll tell you if it flies OK.

The model in question is camouflaged, and 37" span, so I don't expect to
fly at extreme range :-)

I wouldn't use it on a big fast model tho.


>
>


Old Jan 07, 2003, 04:32 AM
The Natural Philosopher
Guest
n/a Posts
Re: Jeti Micro 4 Receiver


Brett wrote:

> i only use jetis on my foamies and anything that doesnt get affected by
> glitches eg floaters. I have had glitches from my jeti in the past.



Yes, mine glitched a bit until I put on full suyppression. It seems OK
on the ground. But I think its a bit more susceptible to interference, yes.


>
> but i have been told jetis are much better these days.
>
>
> "Allan Feld" <allan.feld@mail.tele.dk> wrote in message
> news:3e19f332$0$127$edfadb0f@dread16.news.tele.dk. ..
>
>>Jeti-4 is not quite a full range receiver, however better than most
>>

> limited
>
>>range receivers. For general purpose I would highly recommend the tiny
>>Schulze 435 IPD, which performs extremely fine. I my club we have several
>>Schulze receivers and I've never heard anything but people being very
>>satisfied. Further it's only little more expensive than Jeti.
>>
>>I have a couple of Jeti-4 myself and have experienced problems with
>>

> E-planes
>
>>indoor and outdoor. After I started using Schulzes I only use Jetis for
>>

> HLG
>
>>and Slope.
>>
>>Regards Allan
>>
>>"Mike" <brdlands@hotmail.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>>news:avcn2u$aug$1@news8.svr.pol.co.uk...
>>
>>>Hi,
>>>Has anyone any experience of this receiver? I have one but I'm a little
>>>unsure if it is ok for full range work or only suitable for park flying
>>>

>>etc.
>>
>>>thanks
>>>Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>

>
>


 


Thread Tools

Similar Threads
Category Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hitec Laser 4, 2 HS-55 servos, Hitec Micro 555 receiver. ManWithNoName Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 1 Jul 06, 2004 07:12 AM
WTB - Berg 4 Micro Stamp Receiver Mauilvr Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 11 Jun 24, 2004 10:46 PM
[UK FS] Hitec micro servos, receiver, Jeti ESC Ben C Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 1 Jul 01, 2003 03:05 PM
Brushless Corona RTF with servos, ESC, Berg Micro Stamp receiver and (4) 7-cell 3300 DrDHalko Aircraft - Electric - Airplanes (FS/W) 21 Jun 05, 2003 11:14 AM
Jeti 4 receiver? rob barham Beginner Training Area (Aircraft-Electric) 12 Jul 02, 2001 03:59 PM