|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Next release I have to add "G1" suffix on all G1 motors I suppose Georges sent to me G1 versions For the six 40xx I don't know what I received For Rm I measure at 20°C, directly on the connectors My software makes a Rm evaluation regarding temperature. But my Kth (°C/W) is measured on the flange So maybe there is a temp. gradient between copper and flange It depends also of running time (0.5 minutes maybe doesn't corresponds to your test) Also my freeware takes into account an ESC internal resistance (including ESC wire lengths, and connectors) that is evaluated. It is possible that my freeware is slightly optimistic, but my goal was to give an order of magnitude. Sure, as Drive-Calc is based on a dynamical Rm averaged for several real world tests, with the exact ESC, it could be better. But if you change ESC or voltage, maybe the accuracy is less Louis |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Scorpion Calc v3.06
Hi
Scorpion Calc is up-dated v3.06 for Metric or Imperial (preferences are saved) Go to post#1 in this thread Please destroy older versions (but first ... test the new) Recently tested S4025-10, S4025-12 and S4025-16 New prop APC 18x10E (#228 n100W = 2997 rpm) Louis |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
For now I have no precise info-advice from Georges or Lucien to place a suffix and to complete the list as a function of versions, as I told them. They are very busy .. sure. But you are right ... it would be a good improvement. I think that Georges & Lucien are listening about that. Louis |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Joined Feb 2002
63 Posts
|
Louis,
Excellent work. I have been using my own excel spreadsheets for years to get better results than commercially available software. However, your version gives the most accurate results I have seen. I actually measure the Kv, Io, and Rm of each of my motors. If I plug these values into your application, I get extremely accurate predictions on both current draw and prop rpm. This is based on recording data from an eagletree logger both on the ground and in-flight. I do have one minor issue. It seems that the pitch speed calculation is off if you use a gearbox. For example, if I put the gearbox ratio at 4, the motor speed and prop speed are correct but the pitch speed is low by the multiple of the gearbox. I can just multiply by the gearbox ratio to get the correct value, but I thought you might want to fix it. Thanks, Steve |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Quote:
Thanks for your flowers. Regarding the pitch speed I have to check ASAP. It will be fast then to fix the error. Louis |
|
|
||