Sorry, this part of a post earlier in this thread is wrong!
Due to a scope triggering error with this very Tx.

The runryder-findings are correct,

Sorry, Rudy

Originally Posted by Rudy Vienna

Hi,
.
.
.

3) Aver. latency of the T7 with R617 for servo 1 AND servo 6 is about 10ms (2-18ms, error may be +2ms) due to binary data streaming without PPM-sampling!
That is about 2/5 of the T6 or DX7 (both about 24ms), 1/7 of the DX6 (appr. 72ms) aso, aso....

R.

Go here for more info on the encoding issue:

http://2.4gigahertz.com/techsupport/...m7-7c-6ex.html

GWRIGHT,

How many channels was the parkflyer receiver ?

Tony

Originally Posted by IamMcLovin

Just be careful of the fact that it is an on/off switch once the esc is armed. Once the esc is armed if the throttle stick is above zero and the cut switch is put into the on position it will spin up. If it is at max throttle when the switch is turned on the motor will go WOT.

IamMcLovin, I haven't been able to get it to work. The best it worked was following your example the throttle stayed locked until I advanced the throttle to the halfway point, then the throttle worked but only had half its range.

Am I doing something wrong?

Ron

Review covers the 7C standards, mostly.
I'd like to see something about the dual
elevator servo feature. Something the
72MHZ 7C doesnt do, very well.

you only say 72mhz and not 35mhz as if it is only sold in america, surely is gonna be sold in uk aswell

I sold all my 72mhz stuff on E-bay. I loved the look of my older 8U, but had to use the manual every time i needed to adjust something, not with the 7C. The dial on the Tx is easy to use. I can't wait for the weather to get warm to see how the new system works!!!

Money sent to Tower Hobbies = Not having to put a pin on the bord...Pricless!

The 8U can do a lot more than the 7C, dont sell
your 8U yet! You may find it to be....Priceless!

Originally Posted by Dennis157

The 8U can do a lot more than the 7C, dont sell
your 8U yet! You may find it to be....Priceless!

I think the 7C will meet the needs of most users with overall ease of use.

I agree! I have programmed every computer radio out there, and the 7C wins hands down for ease of programming. The only other Tx worthy in my book is the 9C which has the same programming but with a few more extras!!

I'm with you, PJ. I struggled with my JR8103 for years (still don't fully understand its every quirk), but when I got my 7CAP I had it figured out the first time through. What a difference!

Still waiting for an integral 2.4GHz 9C !!!

So is it possible to change the tx to lipo on your own, or must you get a larger NiCad? Will a larger NiCad fit?

Originally Posted by dead

So is it possible to change the tx to lipo on your own, or must you get a larger NiCad? Will a larger NiCad fit?

Some report good success with the LiPoly - but the voltage of a fully charged 3s pack it a bit too high for my comfort. NiMh cells are the same size as NiCad but offer more capacity that even a similar sized LiPoly.

https://www.tanicpacks.com/index.php...9aee9b853faf24
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXBGF7&P=7
http://www.cheapbatterypacks.com/mai...r=38&model=346

Mike

nimh cells are slightly heavier but have better capacity than nicads

Originally Posted by pda4you

Some report good success with the LiPoly - but the voltage of a fully charged 3s pack it a bit too high for my comfort. NiMh cells are the same size as NiCad but offer more capacity that even a similar sized LiPoly.

https://www.tanicpacks.com/index.php...9aee9b853faf24
http://www3.towerhobbies.com/cgi-bin...?&I=LXBGF7&P=7
http://www.cheapbatterypacks.com/mai...r=38&model=346

Mike

Thanks, this helps a lot. But I am a little confused. I thought that fully charged the voltage for my TX was right at 11v... These packs you show here are 9.6v? Obviously I don't understand something???