HobbyKing.com New Products Flash Sale
Reply
Thread Tools
Old Jan 15, 2007, 04:27 PM
Born to be free
tommyt's Avatar
undefined
Joined Sep 2004
413 Posts
Discussion
Define Scale?

How "true to scale" is that latest 1/3 scale glass slipper you just paid your hard earned mega-bucks for?

How "true to scale" are the 1/4 to 1/3 scale sailplanes from the most reputable manufacturers?

I've read before that one 1/3 scale ASH-26 for example was "more scale" than another and both come from reputable manufacturers. (One has a narrower fuselage than the other.)

What is an acceptable compromise?

Is it okay if the fuselage cross sections are a little off? Maybe a little narrower or wider, longer or shorter?

What about the Wing... obviously, at our reynolds numbers the airfoil should be a suitable model airfoil. But what about the horizontal and vertical stab and the control surfaces to include the ailerons and flaps? Is it acceptable for them to be a little larger than scale?

Regards,
TommyT
tommyt is offline Find More Posts by tommyt
Last edited by tommyt; Jan 15, 2007 at 06:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
Sign up now
to remove ads between posts
Old Jan 15, 2007, 04:53 PM
Vintage wood is the best!
SZD16's Avatar
In a house
Joined Sep 2002
2,829 Posts
It all depends on what you are doing with the airframe....are you building it to fly and have fun with it....or are you building it for competition? Here in the states there are no "official" scale sailplane competitions beside the AMA Nats that I know of and then they only do "stand off scale" I believe. Most manufactures do "tweak" their airframes to make them more "friendly".......the only way to get a "true" to scale airframe is to "roll you own".....and then even then it can be tough to do if you don't have factory drawings to go off of.
SZD16 is online now Find More Posts by SZD16
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 05:28 PM
daveosoar
hampshire
Joined Mar 2006
607 Posts
Mr Reynolds and his Numbers change with scale so 1:1 cannot equate with 1:4
Dave.
daveosoar is offline Find More Posts by daveosoar
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 05:51 PM
Shhhhh
Roachie's Avatar
Armidale NSW Australia
Joined Jan 2006
610 Posts
"ish"...works for me

But I only see it at 50 ft out and blazing across the slope.....

Horses for course I suppose
Roachie is online now Find More Posts by Roachie
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 06:25 PM
Scale Nerd!
Wight's Avatar
Ireland
Joined Jul 2002
234 Posts
IMO if you can't visually detect the deviation that's more than good enough for me. If you need a ruler/tape to show it's out, it's probably not worth worrying about...
Wight is offline Find More Posts by Wight
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 08:12 PM
Registered User
Joined Mar 2004
2,410 Posts
All of the original TMRC designs are near perfect scale, except for any errors such as those SZD16 points out which are due only to following factory three views, blueprints, or other documentation that has been published in error.

For example, the book Sailplanes by Schweizer by Simons and Schweizer points out in the text that the 1-26E airframe was all aluminum except only for the movable surfaces. The drawing by Martin Simons shows the fixed horizontal stabilizer as fabric covered too however. Which is correct? Both authors are experts in the field and their own book has contradictions.... plus a misprint in that it begins this paragraph with "the 1-23" which was clearly meant to be the 1-26 since that is the subject of the paragraph.

I've drawn all of our E model 1-26s with sheeted stab to simulate a sheet-metal-skinned structure, this is however incorrect. Visit Jim Phoenix's web pages here http://www.jimphoenix.com/jimphoenix...empennage.html and you will see serial number 686's empenage, an E model with it's riveted aluminum framework with fabric covering, just as Martin has drawn it.

Tom
mmartin55 is offline Find More Posts by mmartin55
Last edited by mmartin55; Jan 15, 2007 at 08:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 15, 2007, 08:22 PM
That Freeking Laird Guy
TFLG's Avatar
United States, CA, Riverside
Joined Feb 2002
9,117 Posts
Everyone has their own definition of what scale is. Unless of course you enter a scale contest and then the rules of the contest will define "what" scale is for that contest. For me I like a plane to be recognizable as a model of it's full scale counterpart. I really don't care if it's perfectly scale and I will change whatever I need to in order to make a plane fly well. If that means adding flaps to a plane that did not have em, so be it if it means a bigger wing or tail then I will do that too (Unless of course I am going to build a plane for the scale masters). I enjoy building and flying and it it does not fly well, to me ther is no point in building it. Unless it's a contest build and fly what you like!
TFLG is offline Find More Posts by TFLG
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 08:21 AM
Born to be free
tommyt's Avatar
undefined
Joined Sep 2004
413 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TFLG
Everyone has their own definition of what scale is. Unless of course you enter a scale contest and then the rules of the contest will define "what" scale is for that contest. For me I like a plane to be recognizable as a model of it's full scale counterpart. I really don't care if it's perfectly scale and I will change whatever I need to in order to make a plane fly well.
Is this pretty much every ones opinion?

Regards,
Tom
tommyt is offline Find More Posts by tommyt
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 08:34 AM
That Freeking Laird Guy
TFLG's Avatar
United States, CA, Riverside
Joined Feb 2002
9,117 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyt
Is this pretty much every ones opinion?

Regards,
Tom

You know what they say about opinions

There are at a minimum 3 definitions for "scale"

(1) Webster's, 2 a : to arrange in a graduated series b (1) : to measure by or as if by a scale (2) : to measure or estimate the sound content of (as logs) c : to pattern, make, regulate, set, or estimate according to some rate or standard : ADJUST <a production schedule scaled to actual need> -- often used with back, down, or up <scale down imports>
intransitive verb


(2) A Contest's definition, AMA's for example can be found here. http://www.modelaircraft.org/comp/07...book/Scale.pdf

(3) Your own definition. My definition is mine and I don't know if anyone else agrees with it or not. However, I've designed and sold several thousand (sorta scale) PSS kits over the years I suppose at least a few modelers like my definition .

Cheers
TFLG
TFLG is offline Find More Posts by TFLG
Last edited by TFLG; Jan 16, 2007 at 09:38 AM.
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 09:27 AM
Vintage wood is the best!
SZD16's Avatar
In a house
Joined Sep 2002
2,829 Posts
Unless you are competing in the Scale masters....scale is what you want it to be. If it looks good to your eye and the price works for you.......go with the flow man!!
SZD16 is online now Find More Posts by SZD16
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 09:58 AM
Registered User
timmig's Avatar
Southern California
Joined Sep 2003
6,903 Posts
It's that damn small white thing that sits on the floor and tells me I have to DIET!!!!
timmig is offline Find More Posts by timmig
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 12:14 PM
Registered User
Akerman's Avatar
Japan, Tokyo, Setagaya
Joined Jan 2005
223 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tommyt
What about the Wing... obviously, at our reynolds numbers the airfoil should be a suitable model airfoil.
I found out that my 20+ year-old Multiplex ASW 20 sports the airfoil of the original ASW 20 wingroot which looks kind of strange compared to the typical model airfoils...
The wing geometry, aspect ratio etc. are very near to scale as well. Don't know about the fuse though.

I maidened it on Saturday and was not at all impressed with its performance, but maybe that was just my incompetent piloting... I will test it again on a better day and have an experienced pilot fly it.

It is obviuos that it would be possible to build a very good performing ASW 20 with scale wing geometry and a modern airfoil. Maybe I'll do a new set of wings if these really dont work out...

Philipp
Akerman is offline Find More Posts by Akerman
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 12:27 PM
Less Whinning, More Flying
Sailhigh's Avatar
SF Bay Area, USA
Joined Feb 2003
1,742 Posts
Opinions vastly differ. In my past experience, basically here's how it works. The smaller the scale plane, the less scale it is. Bigger tailplane, larger wing tips,....etc. Larger planes like 1/3 scale and up, more closely resemble the full size . Now each mfg has their idea of scale. Some believe that a general scale looking plane, but modified to have better handling (no nasty tip stalls, gentler pitch authority and all), will generate more customer base. Others stick to strictly scale and believe if you can't handle it, you shouldn't be flying it!! Again, given two similar models of the same size (e.g. ASW-24 at 1:3.75 scale) from different mfg will look some what different. One is more scale than other. I've noticed most people don't care if a plane it's slightly out of scale. Then again some people want exact scale and end up flying it with no pilots in the cockpit...How scale is that??? It's all up to what YOU want.
Sailhigh is offline Find More Posts by Sailhigh
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2007, 03:46 PM
I failed linkage geometry
salisbug's Avatar
Melbourne, Australia
Joined Jun 2002
4,238 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by timmig
It's that damn small white thing that sits on the floor and tells me I have to DIET!!!!
lol. me too
salisbug is offline Find More Posts by salisbug
Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2007, 02:00 AM
Registered User
Guernsey - UK Channel Islands
Joined Aug 2003
459 Posts
If you scratch build your own (definition = start by drawing your own plans), then you will always try your absolute best to make it true scale, all apart from the airfoil for reasons discussed. It prays on my mind if I subsequently find something is incorrect, especially if someone else has pointed it out.

If you buy off the shelf you may have already got excuses for errors but you will never have the same pride as you get when rolling your own. You will quickly become intollerant of discrepancies
VincentC is offline Find More Posts by VincentC
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools